Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Troubled Yankees Join Troubled Red Sox In Last Place

1B Search Continues—Kyle Blanks?

Blanks, on the right, with his TJ scar visible. That's a big boy.

This community seemed split on how much sense it made to hand a multi-year, relatively high value contract to the likes of Josh Willingham and it appears the Indians are hesitant as well. The Indians are, reportedly, shifting their strategy towards the trade market as the source of their 1B/LF RHB soultion. Gaby Sanchez was a popular rumor when Pujols was still rumored to be heading to Florida, but with Pujols in an Angels uniform, that ship has (or never did?) sailed. The Angels might have some chips, but the Indians are almost certainly tepid on Mark Trumbo (as they should be), and Kendry Morales' health appears to be a huge question mark. Morales has missed a season and a half worth of games after breaking his leg during a grand slam celebration.

Another name has surfaced from the West Coast—stalled Padres prospect Kyle Blanks. I probably wouldn't be writing anything at all about this, except that I couldn't resist the idea that the Indians might trade relief help and spare parts to acquire a young, San Diego position player in order to fill a major hole. We've done this once before and it didn't work out. For his part, Blanks never really reached top prospect status, although he did manage to force his way into the Padres' plans after showing good power and contact ability in the minors. His very short major league career has been up and down, lately more down than up.

Star-divide

Blanks is a mountain of a man, nearly 6'6" and nearly 300 lbs and can supposedly play 1B or LF. He's considered a good athlete despite his hulking stature. This size might be working against him—he's missed a number of games due to injuries, including Tommy John surgery and plantar fasciitis. These injuries aren't any better excuses than Matt LaPorta's list of bumps and bruises and Blanks, entering his age 25 season, is in danger of following the trajectory of players like LaPorta and Chris Davis—big, defensively limited sluggers who don't bring their bats when they get called topside.

The impulse with any Padre is to check home/road splits but Blanks looks no better statistically through the lens of Petco—he actually has an OPS about 60 points higher in his home park. You could see this as a good thing: the Padres SLG'd only .334 in Petco as a team last season, so Blanks' career mark of .430 actually seems pretty impressive. At the same time, this is all small sample size and Blanks' inability to simply make contact (3:1 K:BB rate and career average of .219) are overwhelming any good signs.

Blanks is, unquestionably, a buy low candidate, but he's hardly a ready-made solution like Willingham or Sanchez. There is a chance with Blanks that you're getting a player who's poised to become a decent starter if he can just stay healthy and get his feet under him; there's also a chance you're just acquiring a player who should inspire no more hope than Matt LaPorta. If Blanks is acquired, it's going to be on the basis of scouting, not statistical track record.

Of course, there's also the matter of the price. The rumor mill says the Padres want relief help, and the Indians have that to offer in spades. If the price is a reliever or two—say, Bryce Stowell and Joe Smith, it'd be hard to heave too many criticisms at the deal.

The Padres have another buy low candidate at 1B—Anthony Rizzo, one of the pieces from the Adrian Gonzalez trade. Rizzo's debut in the majors was very poor and his minor league track record is extremely similar to Blanks'. As he's younger than Blanks, his price tag would assumedly be higher. Incidentally, Gaby Sanchez, Blanks, and Rizzo all have extremely similar minor league lines, which tells you something about the best case scenario for the latter two.

Comment 47 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Let's Go Tribe

Game 35: Indians 5, Twins 4

May 2012 by Ryan - 31 comments

Transactions: Indians Sign Kotchman

Feb 2012 by Ryan - 84 comments

Unfinished Business

Dec 2011 by Ryan - 107 comments

Daily Tribe News: November 18, 2011

Nov 2011 by Ryan - 32 comments

Comments

Display:

MLB.com with some Morales news. Apparently, he has to prove he can run at full-speed, and the Angels are definitely not just cutting him loose.

by afh4 on Dec 10, 2011 6:08 PM EST reply actions  

Man. Is this fantasy draft analogy time? Every Indians off season is like the pick right after a huge run on running backs. Do you pick Chester Taylor because you need A running back of some kind or just screw it and pick the best kicker in the league, oh crap, that won’t help much either.

by Brick. on Dec 10, 2011 11:33 PM EST via mobile reply actions   1 recs

I have a roommate who is a Padres fan and I have seen him a few times in Spring Training so I am somewhat familiar with Blanks. He screams LaPorta to me. He moves well for his size, the ball doesn’t seem to land when he gets a hold of it, and even though he can’t really make contact, and doesn’t inspire much confidence at the plate, you keep coming back with him because you think he might drop a bomb this time.

I would appreciate it if the Indians didn’t go down that path with Blanks. There just isn’t enough there to make him a candidate that is any better than LaPorta.

I think the analysis is spot on above and gives ample reason to leave him in SD. I would be marginally more ok with Rizzo since he is younger, but would still be opposed generally speaking.

by McWahoo on Dec 11, 2011 1:33 AM EST reply actions  

Yeah, that does sound like LaPorta.

by westbrook on Dec 11, 2011 12:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Bowden says Cleveland and Seattle are the favorites for Willingham. I think two years, $16M is about right, but we’ve heard nothing about possible terms.

He’s good for about 120 games per year. He had his highest K rate and just about his lowest BB rate in 2011. I don’t know what that means for a guy who is 32 and who offers no defensive value. He’s never played 1B either, but I believe e came up as a catcher.

by xrickx on Dec 11, 2011 11:31 AM EST reply actions  

Look at his second-half numbers. Played solidly six games per week, 883 OPS despite .251 average, suggesting some bad BIP luck was mixed in there (.265).

by Jay on Dec 11, 2011 11:54 AM EST up reply actions  

Partly what I’m suggesting here is that he wasn’t fully healthy in the first half. He was really bad in June and went on the DL.

by Jay on Dec 11, 2011 11:55 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m telling you, something about him smells Delluccian to me.

by afh4 on Dec 11, 2011 11:59 AM EST up reply actions  

Willingham is a better hitter across the board.

by YoDaddyWags on Dec 11, 2011 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

If he were available for a Dellucci deal, I’d offer it yesterday. I think he’ll make almost double that.

Dellucci had his success in Texas and Philly, two offensive environments. Willingham has taken care of business in Florida, Washington, and Oakland.

by xrickx on Dec 11, 2011 12:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Dellucci had a 92 OPS+ through age 30, then had 2 legitimately good years, one in Texas and one in Philly, which were not skewed by home/road splits. Then he came to Cleveland and resumed sucking.

by YoDaddyWags on Dec 11, 2011 1:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I think we’re saying the same thing?

by xrickx on Dec 11, 2011 1:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Just clarifying that he didn’t BABIP or homer-friendly-home-park his way to those two good years, he earned them. And he earned all those sucky years, too.

by YoDaddyWags on Dec 11, 2011 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Dellucci in the 3 years prior to joining Cleveland:
.258 BA / .359 OBP / .494 SLG / .854 OPS / 115 OPS+ in 1,206 PA

Willingham’s last 3 years:
.257 BA / .360 OBP / .479 SLG / .839 OPS / 125 OPS+ in 1,515 PA

The Tribe paid Dellucci $11.5 over 3 years. If they give more than double that for Willingham in a 3-year deal, um…

by The DiaTriber on Dec 11, 2011 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Dellucci, in part because he couldn’t hit lefties and thus sat a lot, had put up 4.7 oWAR in the three years before he signed with Cleveland; Willingham, whose limitations are not platoon splits but rather losing a month of the season here or there to injury, has put up 7.6 oWAR in his last three seasons. If they were paying him in essence for his previous three years, at $4.5 per oWAR, Dellucci would have been worth $21.15 million; Willingham $34.2 million. Not quite twice as much. Haven’t factored in oWAR inflation from ’07 to ’11 here, so Willingham might be worth twice the price.

by YoDaddyWags on Dec 11, 2011 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Beat me to it.

There’s s difference between getting those numbers out of a lefty vs. a righty.

by Jay on Dec 11, 2011 2:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I get all of that, but I’ll side with Andrew here with the feeling that paying for age 33 through age 35 seasons for Willingham feels Delluccian. Maybe the oWAR and Fansgraphian “one WAR equals $X” contradicts that, but we were all behind the Dellucci signing too as a potential value.

by The DiaTriber on Dec 11, 2011 2:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m in this camp

by APV on Dec 11, 2011 2:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Dellucci doesn’t seem a good comp for Willingham. Dellucci had an 88 OPS+ as a 24-year-old starter, then spent a couple of years in the minors, then came back to post 105, 83, 70 and 96 OPS+ from ages 27 through 30. Then he peaked with a 126 and a 123, then the Indians signed him, then he collapsed to a 77 and 89.

Willingham has been steady, putting up 115-129 OPS+ for his six years in the majors. If he puts up a 77 and 89, it would come out of nowhere, unlike Dellucci, who returned, like Algernon and Charlie, to their subnormal roots.

I don’t know that Willingham would be the most efficient use of Tribe dollars, but I don’t see Dellucci.

by YoDaddyWags on Dec 11, 2011 2:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice “Flowers…” reference.

by hans on Dec 11, 2011 3:52 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m not very pro-Willingham, but I don’t feel the pangs of Dellucci when I wonder why.

Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.

by USSChoo on Dec 11, 2011 5:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I only care about ages 33 and 34.

by emd2k3 on Dec 12, 2011 11:58 AM EST up reply actions  

The three year thing is a little convenient. Willingham has hit consistently for six straight seasons. Dellucci hadn’t hit anything until two years before the indians signed him.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Dec 11, 2011 5:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Your point being, Willingham seems to have a higher baseline of talent.

by Jay on Dec 11, 2011 6:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Right, it seems reasonable to assume Willingham will continue to produce at something close to this level for a couple years still. Delucci had a track record of crappy play which is absent from Willingham’s career.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Dec 12, 2011 8:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I like what he does when he’s in the lineup. He’s just not that durable. Despite (or because of) his injuries, l think a 2 year, $16M deal is appropriate. I think his lack of durability is what makes a 3 year, $30M deal a bit too rich in years and dollars.

by xrickx on Dec 11, 2011 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

If the Indians aren’t hot and heavy with Willingham, I’m worried that the finances of this team are even worse than we expected. I see a potential signing of Willingham as very similar to the Byrd signing. The Indians desperately need to fill a glaring hole over a few years they expect to contend. Barring Seattle wanting to take one of our marginal players, I’m not sure we can do much better. We’re not filling the 1B/LF issue internally anytime soon, and I’m not sure a couple middle relievers + Cord Phelps is enough to get anything we’d really want on the trade market (pretty much the Gutierrez trade in reverse, right?). A 2-3 win player for 8ish million a year is certainly nothing to get excited over, and it won’t make or break a playoff appearance, but I think you have to maximize your expected win total over the next 2-3 years, even if you’re not doing it as efficiently as you could.

by 7foot3 on Dec 11, 2011 4:25 PM EST up reply actions  

This is where I am as well. The Indians will probably have to over pay to get Willingham, but that’s ok, this is our contention window.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Dec 11, 2011 5:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Yep. I’ve been saying it over and over. This is the time to overpay for marginal upgrades on 1B and OF.

by Cols714 on Dec 12, 2011 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh look … a dead horse.

by emd2k3 on Dec 12, 2011 5:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I have this stick…

Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.

by USSChoo on Dec 12, 2011 5:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, because everyone is in agreement…

What is wrong with you?

by Cols714 on Dec 12, 2011 7:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Matt LaPorta

"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl

by world dictator on Dec 12, 2011 7:28 PM EST up reply actions  

You don’t overpay just for the sake of overspending, which I feel we would be doing for Willingham.

Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.

by USSChoo on Dec 12, 2011 8:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Willingham is a clear upgrade over what we currently have on the roster. What type of player would you be willing to overpay for?

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Dec 12, 2011 8:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t feel comfortable at 3 years, that has generally been my beef.

Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.

by USSChoo on Dec 12, 2011 9:26 PM EST up reply actions  

So what type of player would you feel comfortable with?

Willingham compares favorably with both Cuddyer and Ramirez so unless you wouldn’t give them 3yr/$30 I don’t see how you can be adamantly opposed to signing Willingham.

"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl

by world dictator on Dec 12, 2011 10:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Likewise, I haven’t been advocating for either of those guys. I know many of us are taking that to mean I don’t want an upgrade, but that isn’t the case. Cuddyer is the most appealing to me out of that bunch because of his ability to play first, but is less inspiring at the plate than Willingham. 1B is where I would spend my money while looking to acquire younger talent in the OF through trades or FA (not really possible this year).

Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.

by USSChoo on Dec 13, 2011 9:55 AM EST up reply actions  

So you do what then? Run out the likes of Duncan, Brantley, and Carrera in a season you plan/hope to contend? It’s not my money, but I think you choose overpaying instead of giving a combined 700 PAs to Crowe and Carrera over the next two years, like you did the last two.

by 7foot3 on Dec 12, 2011 8:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Duncan I feel comfortable with as a sub, Brantley I have a little more confidence in than some around here. I was encouraged by his early season performance and think, while I shouldn’t, that his production dip was due largely to injury. I’d rather see this team invest the money that some want to put into Willingham, in a 1B option.

Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.

by USSChoo on Dec 12, 2011 9:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Nothing. I might agree with you, but you mention it at every turn … that’s all.

by emd2k3 on Dec 12, 2011 9:01 PM EST up reply actions  

He probably means me. We have a brief history of not seeing eye to eye.

Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.

by USSChoo on Dec 12, 2011 9:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Then one of you needs to stand on their tip-toes!

Fear the Fedora.

by MooneysRebellion on Dec 13, 2011 10:11 AM EST up reply actions  

He’s distracted by your sexy avatar.

by emd2k3 on Dec 13, 2011 2:19 PM EST up reply actions  

And the continued display of sexiness rests on the shoulders of one Grady Sizemore. We need you now, Grady. More than ever before.

Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.

by USSChoo on Dec 13, 2011 3:53 PM EST up reply actions  

KG ranked the Padres farm today, and made Blanks their 7th best talent under 25, ahead of Rizzo.

Perhaps there’s more there than I realized.

by afh4 on Dec 13, 2011 4:27 PM EST reply actions  

and said this:

Blanks might be too low here, as I’m excited about what he can do as an everyday left fielder who is not being jerked around

Consider me skeptical. Given his size, I don’t think he has the swing to cover his strike zone adequately. His K-rate has risen steadily as he has progressed through levels of competition, reaching Shoppachian levels in the big leagues.

by APV on Dec 13, 2011 10:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #36
Draft_lens6670022module54040272photo_1251768414louissockalexisicon4b_small
Five Russian Poets Contemplate Taking In A Ballgame
Indians70sicon_small
Youkilis for Pure Rage
Avatard_new_small
Indians by the Numbers — #36
Topps1978-332f_small
Historical Timeline
427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small
Pick 6 Discussion
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #35
Avatard_new_small
Indians by the Numbers — #34
Small
Indians 2012 Player At Bat Music
Etat_small
Tribe Observations - 15 games In

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Will Matt LaPorta be on the opening day roster?
Yes
59 votes
No
140 votes

199 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

From Espn's Sweetspot Blog: "Indians as good as overrated Tigers"
Joe Smith involed in bar incident, no charges filed
Scott Radinsky and Chris Perez on FanGraphs audio
2012 MLB Power Rankings - May 21st
Kerry Wood hangs 'em up
I did not like Cleveland Municipal Stadium. Like it? How could anyone like...
Garko gets another shot
Broadcaster Rankings (Radio): 30-21
Indians at Fenway don't drink beer; they watch TV.
Michael Brantley: A Studious 4-for-5 Night

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Editors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4