1B Search Continues—Kyle Blanks?
This community seemed split on how much sense it made to hand a multi-year, relatively high value contract to the likes of Josh Willingham and it appears the Indians are hesitant as well. The Indians are, reportedly, shifting their strategy towards the trade market as the source of their 1B/LF RHB soultion. Gaby Sanchez was a popular rumor when Pujols was still rumored to be heading to Florida, but with Pujols in an Angels uniform, that ship has (or never did?) sailed. The Angels might have some chips, but the Indians are almost certainly tepid on Mark Trumbo (as they should be), and Kendry Morales' health appears to be a huge question mark. Morales has missed a season and a half worth of games after breaking his leg during a grand slam celebration.
Another name has surfaced from the West Coast—stalled Padres prospect Kyle Blanks. I probably wouldn't be writing anything at all about this, except that I couldn't resist the idea that the Indians might trade relief help and spare parts to acquire a young, San Diego position player in order to fill a major hole. We've done this once before and it didn't work out. For his part, Blanks never really reached top prospect status, although he did manage to force his way into the Padres' plans after showing good power and contact ability in the minors. His very short major league career has been up and down, lately more down than up.
Blanks is a mountain of a man, nearly 6'6" and nearly 300 lbs and can supposedly play 1B or LF. He's considered a good athlete despite his hulking stature. This size might be working against him—he's missed a number of games due to injuries, including Tommy John surgery and plantar fasciitis. These injuries aren't any better excuses than Matt LaPorta's list of bumps and bruises and Blanks, entering his age 25 season, is in danger of following the trajectory of players like LaPorta and Chris Davis—big, defensively limited sluggers who don't bring their bats when they get called topside.
The impulse with any Padre is to check home/road splits but Blanks looks no better statistically through the lens of Petco—he actually has an OPS about 60 points higher in his home park. You could see this as a good thing: the Padres SLG'd only .334 in Petco as a team last season, so Blanks' career mark of .430 actually seems pretty impressive. At the same time, this is all small sample size and Blanks' inability to simply make contact (3:1 K:BB rate and career average of .219) are overwhelming any good signs.
Blanks is, unquestionably, a buy low candidate, but he's hardly a ready-made solution like Willingham or Sanchez. There is a chance with Blanks that you're getting a player who's poised to become a decent starter if he can just stay healthy and get his feet under him; there's also a chance you're just acquiring a player who should inspire no more hope than Matt LaPorta. If Blanks is acquired, it's going to be on the basis of scouting, not statistical track record.
Of course, there's also the matter of the price. The rumor mill says the Padres want relief help, and the Indians have that to offer in spades. If the price is a reliever or two—say, Bryce Stowell and Joe Smith, it'd be hard to heave too many criticisms at the deal.
The Padres have another buy low candidate at 1B—Anthony Rizzo, one of the pieces from the Adrian Gonzalez trade. Rizzo's debut in the majors was very poor and his minor league track record is extremely similar to Blanks'. As he's younger than Blanks, his price tag would assumedly be higher. Incidentally, Gaby Sanchez, Blanks, and Rizzo all have extremely similar minor league lines, which tells you something about the best case scenario for the latter two.
47 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
MLB.com with some Morales news. Apparently, he has to prove he can run at full-speed, and the Angels are definitely not just cutting him loose.
Man. Is this fantasy draft analogy time? Every Indians off season is like the pick right after a huge run on running backs. Do you pick Chester Taylor because you need A running back of some kind or just screw it and pick the best kicker in the league, oh crap, that won’t help much either.
by Brick. on Dec 10, 2011 11:33 PM EST via mobile reply actions 1 recs
I have a roommate who is a Padres fan and I have seen him a few times in Spring Training so I am somewhat familiar with Blanks. He screams LaPorta to me. He moves well for his size, the ball doesn’t seem to land when he gets a hold of it, and even though he can’t really make contact, and doesn’t inspire much confidence at the plate, you keep coming back with him because you think he might drop a bomb this time.
I would appreciate it if the Indians didn’t go down that path with Blanks. There just isn’t enough there to make him a candidate that is any better than LaPorta.
I think the analysis is spot on above and gives ample reason to leave him in SD. I would be marginally more ok with Rizzo since he is younger, but would still be opposed generally speaking.
Bowden says Cleveland and Seattle are the favorites for Willingham. I think two years, $16M is about right, but we’ve heard nothing about possible terms.
He’s good for about 120 games per year. He had his highest K rate and just about his lowest BB rate in 2011. I don’t know what that means for a guy who is 32 and who offers no defensive value. He’s never played 1B either, but I believe e came up as a catcher.
Look at his second-half numbers. Played solidly six games per week, 883 OPS despite .251 average, suggesting some bad BIP luck was mixed in there (.265).
Partly what I’m suggesting here is that he wasn’t fully healthy in the first half. He was really bad in June and went on the DL.
Willingham is a better hitter across the board.
by YoDaddyWags on Dec 11, 2011 12:28 PM EST up reply actions
If he were available for a Dellucci deal, I’d offer it yesterday. I think he’ll make almost double that.
Dellucci had his success in Texas and Philly, two offensive environments. Willingham has taken care of business in Florida, Washington, and Oakland.
Dellucci had a 92 OPS+ through age 30, then had 2 legitimately good years, one in Texas and one in Philly, which were not skewed by home/road splits. Then he came to Cleveland and resumed sucking.
Dellucci in the 3 years prior to joining Cleveland:
.258 BA / .359 OBP / .494 SLG / .854 OPS / 115 OPS+ in 1,206 PA
Willingham’s last 3 years:
.257 BA / .360 OBP / .479 SLG / .839 OPS / 125 OPS+ in 1,515 PA
The Tribe paid Dellucci $11.5 over 3 years. If they give more than double that for Willingham in a 3-year deal, um…
by The DiaTriber on Dec 11, 2011 1:28 PM EST up reply actions
Dellucci, in part because he couldn’t hit lefties and thus sat a lot, had put up 4.7 oWAR in the three years before he signed with Cleveland; Willingham, whose limitations are not platoon splits but rather losing a month of the season here or there to injury, has put up 7.6 oWAR in his last three seasons. If they were paying him in essence for his previous three years, at $4.5 per oWAR, Dellucci would have been worth $21.15 million; Willingham $34.2 million. Not quite twice as much. Haven’t factored in oWAR inflation from ’07 to ’11 here, so Willingham might be worth twice the price.
I get all of that, but I’ll side with Andrew here with the feeling that paying for age 33 through age 35 seasons for Willingham feels Delluccian. Maybe the oWAR and Fansgraphian “one WAR equals $X” contradicts that, but we were all behind the Dellucci signing too as a potential value.
by The DiaTriber on Dec 11, 2011 2:34 PM EST up reply actions
Dellucci doesn’t seem a good comp for Willingham. Dellucci had an 88 OPS+ as a 24-year-old starter, then spent a couple of years in the minors, then came back to post 105, 83, 70 and 96 OPS+ from ages 27 through 30. Then he peaked with a 126 and a 123, then the Indians signed him, then he collapsed to a 77 and 89.
Willingham has been steady, putting up 115-129 OPS+ for his six years in the majors. If he puts up a 77 and 89, it would come out of nowhere, unlike Dellucci, who returned, like Algernon and Charlie, to their subnormal roots.
I don’t know that Willingham would be the most efficient use of Tribe dollars, but I don’t see Dellucci.
The three year thing is a little convenient. Willingham has hit consistently for six straight seasons. Dellucci hadn’t hit anything until two years before the indians signed him.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Dec 11, 2011 5:25 PM EST up reply actions
Right, it seems reasonable to assume Willingham will continue to produce at something close to this level for a couple years still. Delucci had a track record of crappy play which is absent from Willingham’s career.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Dec 12, 2011 8:32 PM EST up reply actions
If the Indians aren’t hot and heavy with Willingham, I’m worried that the finances of this team are even worse than we expected. I see a potential signing of Willingham as very similar to the Byrd signing. The Indians desperately need to fill a glaring hole over a few years they expect to contend. Barring Seattle wanting to take one of our marginal players, I’m not sure we can do much better. We’re not filling the 1B/LF issue internally anytime soon, and I’m not sure a couple middle relievers + Cord Phelps is enough to get anything we’d really want on the trade market (pretty much the Gutierrez trade in reverse, right?). A 2-3 win player for 8ish million a year is certainly nothing to get excited over, and it won’t make or break a playoff appearance, but I think you have to maximize your expected win total over the next 2-3 years, even if you’re not doing it as efficiently as you could.
This is where I am as well. The Indians will probably have to over pay to get Willingham, but that’s ok, this is our contention window.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Dec 11, 2011 5:28 PM EST up reply actions
Yep. I’ve been saying it over and over. This is the time to overpay for marginal upgrades on 1B and OF.
Matt LaPorta
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Dec 12, 2011 7:28 PM EST up reply actions
You don’t overpay just for the sake of overspending, which I feel we would be doing for Willingham.
Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.
Willingham is a clear upgrade over what we currently have on the roster. What type of player would you be willing to overpay for?
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Dec 12, 2011 8:34 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t feel comfortable at 3 years, that has generally been my beef.
Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.
So what type of player would you feel comfortable with?
Willingham compares favorably with both Cuddyer and Ramirez so unless you wouldn’t give them 3yr/$30 I don’t see how you can be adamantly opposed to signing Willingham.
"sometimes the internet is hard for me." - ClemsonGirl
by world dictator on Dec 12, 2011 10:31 PM EST up reply actions
Likewise, I haven’t been advocating for either of those guys. I know many of us are taking that to mean I don’t want an upgrade, but that isn’t the case. Cuddyer is the most appealing to me out of that bunch because of his ability to play first, but is less inspiring at the plate than Willingham. 1B is where I would spend my money while looking to acquire younger talent in the OF through trades or FA (not really possible this year).
Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.
So you do what then? Run out the likes of Duncan, Brantley, and Carrera in a season you plan/hope to contend? It’s not my money, but I think you choose overpaying instead of giving a combined 700 PAs to Crowe and Carrera over the next two years, like you did the last two.
Duncan I feel comfortable with as a sub, Brantley I have a little more confidence in than some around here. I was encouraged by his early season performance and think, while I shouldn’t, that his production dip was due largely to injury. I’d rather see this team invest the money that some want to put into Willingham, in a 1B option.
Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.
He probably means me. We have a brief history of not seeing eye to eye.
Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.
Then one of you needs to stand on their tip-toes!
Fear the Fedora.
by MooneysRebellion on Dec 13, 2011 10:11 AM EST up reply actions
KG ranked the Padres farm today, and made Blanks their 7th best talent under 25, ahead of Rizzo.
Perhaps there’s more there than I realized.
and said this:
Blanks might be too low here, as I’m excited about what he can do as an everyday left fielder who is not being jerked around
Consider me skeptical. Given his size, I don’t think he has the swing to cover his strike zone adequately. His K-rate has risen steadily as he has progressed through levels of competition, reaching Shoppachian levels in the big leagues.

by 




on 










