Game 101: Angels 2, Indians 1
For the second straight night, the Indians went into the ninth inning down a run, but this time came up short despite having a golden opportunity to at least tie the game.
The Indians couldn't score a run off Jered Weaver until the seventh inning, but had more opportunities to score off the LAoA starter than you'd expect. In the third and fourth innings, the Indians had a runner in scoring position with one out, and runners on first and third with two outs. The outcome was predictable, though the offense fared a bit better than I thought it would. In fact, if the wind wasn't blowing in, the Indians might have scored a run or two. Asdrubal Cabrera's fly out in the sixth especially looked ticketed for the right field seats, but the unusual wind direction for this time of the year kept the ball in the yard.
Josh Tomlin in his last start allowed four runs on eight hits to Minnesota, but tonight he pitched very well, even with the mistake to Mark Trumbo in the seventh. He was a strike-throwing machine, going eight innings on 92 pitches, 69 of them strikes. Unfortunately, he had no room for error, as his one mistake came in a scoreless game.
The seventh started with a Bobby Abreu single. Vernon Wells then hit a swinging bunt, and Carlos Santana made a very good play to get Wells at first. Abreu went to second on the play, the second time an Angel had reached second to that point. After Alberto Callaspo flied out, Manny Acta elected to walk Howie Kendrick intentionally. Kendrick had hit the ball hard in each of his first two at-bats, and was the best hitter in the lineup, especially of late. That brought to the plate Mark Trumbo, and Tomlin went to work on him, getting ahead and then trying to put him away with his curve. His first curve was in a very good spot, but Trumbo got a piece to stay alive. Tomlin the doubled up on the pitch, but instead of being down and out of the strike zone, it hung thigh-high on the outer half of the plate. Trumbo smacked the ball to the base of the right field wall for a two-run double.
Tomlin would pitch a 1-2-3 eighth, which marked the farthest he'd gone in a game this season.
The Indians got a run back on Matt LaPorta's seventh inning home run. In the eighth, the Indians looked to have the beginning of a rally after Austin Kearns walked to lead off the inning. Acta put on the hit-and-run with Michael Brantley at the plate, but Brantley hit the ball a bit foul. Later, Brantley hit into a double play, and the once-promising inning was short-circuited.
Rafael Perez pitched a scoreless ninth, and the Indians went into the bottom of the inning down one and facing Angel closer Jordan Walden, just like last night. The score was even the same. Travis Hafner, led off the inning with a chop single, and he was pinch-run for. Carlos Santana then singled just past Kendrick, placing runners on first and second with nobody out. Lonnie Chisenhall was up next, and he was asked to bunt, quite a tall order for a young player facing a closer whose fastball sat in the upper 90s. But Chisenhall not only put Walden's high fastball on the ground, he put it in almost perfectly down the third base line. Jeff Mathis was able to get to the ball, but threw late to third. The bases were loaded with nobody out, and Matt LaPorta was up. Walden was all over the place in the LaPorta at-bat, getting ahead 0-2 before uncorking a series of pitches well out of the strike zone. On the 2-2 pitch Walden threw an upper-90s fastball about 8 inches from LaPorta's head, but on the 3-2 pitch LaPorta hit a check-swing bouncer, and couldn't get to first in time to prevent a 4-2-3 double play. Walden then struck out Jason Kipnis to end the game.
The Tigers would come back to beat the White Sox later, so the division deficit is back to two games.

| Highest WPA | Lowest WPA | ||
| Chisenhall | .203 | LaPorta | -.433 |
| Santana | .163 | Brantley | -.362 |
| Hafner | .121 | Kipnis | -.259 |
78 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
After scrolling through the game thread, even worse. Bases loaded, no outs? Come on! And what did LaPorta do to screw it up?
Bad AB. Included one of his patented half-swings. On 3-2 pitch hit the ball right in front of the plate, soft grounder to 2nd. He watched the ball and then to a look over to third to see where the runner is before putting his head down. He was slow as ever and got doubled up 4-2-1. Went from 73% chance of winning to 23% according to fangraphs.
by Ryan Kelsey on Jul 26, 2011 11:44 PM EDT up reply actions
*4-2-3. The bases were loaded, no out in the 9th.
by Ryan Kelsey on Jul 26, 2011 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions
glad i’m not following him
"I want to be playing at the end of October or the end of September -- not just at the beginning of April." —Grady
I know its completely en vogue to be killing LaPorta right now but I can’t go along with it. He was the only guy to do anything against Weaver. And with 2 strikes he got a borderline pitch that was 99 mph. I know the result was as about as bad as it could get, but very few major league hitters are making contact with that pitch, much less making it even a productive out. And the criticism on twitter, as it usually is, is over the top.
I’m with you. I was about to post something when I saw your post come up. There’s a lot of LaPorta-hate lately, driven by low OBP and probably not meeting expectations. Was it a great at-bat? No. But he had a good swing at a fastball out over the plate on the first pitch, and he worked himself back to a full count. Terrible at-bat? Worst you’ve seen in awhile? A bit much.
He didn’t run right away, but he did get jammed with that pitch. Also, it’s pretty clear he’s not 100%, and I doubt he’ll be 100% the rest of the year. When he first came back, it appeared to me that he tweaked that ankle about once per game the first week he came back. He’s not fast by any means, but he’s really laboring out there, and that probably resulted in the double play.
Here’s the way I see it. It doesn’t appear he will ever be a high OBP guy. He won’t be a force in the lineup like we hoped when the trade was made. His baseball instincts are poor. But this year he’s made real progress with staying in the center of the field…he’s much better than a year ago…still has work to do there, but he’s made progress. His bat has a lot of sock in it, and it’s his first full year in the bigs. Plus, he’s a right-handed bat. Basically, he offers something that this lineup lacks. Without a real good alternative, I’m willing to give him awhile to see if he can be a .260/.325/.475 guy.
by TribeJay on Jul 27, 2011 1:54 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I’m tired of hearing about his injury excuses. For two years it was his hip and now its an ankle? All I know is that he’s almost at 900 MLB PA and he’s OPS’ed .694 at first base with a negative WAR. I don’t care what side of the plate you hit from, that’s not sufficient. Oh ya, and he’s 26.5 yrs old.
I’m fine with continuing to play him for now since we really don’t have a better option, but we need to start planning for other options at 1B for next year and beyond.
by TKilbane on Jul 27, 2011 2:20 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Hey, the ankle has made him slower…it hurt him in relation to getting doubled up, that’s all I’m saying. Of course, his late break cost him too.
And oh ya, I don’t disagree with your points regarding age and OPS. My point is that he has a talent that doesn’t exist elsewhere on this team, and I’m not just giving up on him without seeing if he can realize that talent. But I’m not opposed to them looking outside the organization for that ability.
I feel the same way you feel, but I also recognize that he shares some common characteristics with late bloomers. A history of minor injuries is one of those characteristics. The great majority of hitters continue to improve in selectivity as they advance through their 20s (if they can stick in the majors that long). I think LaPorta may well turn out to be a guy who gets slightly more selective and in turn far more effective overall.
He has the luxury of not being challenged by any significant talent in the minors, and playing on a team that will not pay Mark Teixeira $180 million to supplant him; essentially, the biggest threat to his playing time is Marson. So there is a chance that he will get another year of PA to develop his eye and turn things around — as opposed to kicking around on minor league deals — like Ortiz — or like Buck.
After thinking about my original post some more, I do think Marson is the real threat here. I think Santana’s defense behind the plate is probably better than he’s shown, but there has been a clear difference between him and Marson this year. It wouldn’t shock me if LaPorta went in a deal and they decided to make first base Santana’s primary position. Maybe this is where that Ianetta rumor came from.
A “good swing” at the first pitch? It was a meatball, and he missed it. Now, it’s harder to put a 99-mph meatball in play, but somehow Brantley did last night. And Hafner. And countless others who claim to be big leaguers. In that kind of at bat, you tend to get one very good look. If you don’t do something with it, you’re not be congratulated for “having a good swing.” It’s called a strike.
I disagree with anyone who wants to claim lack of effort. LaPorta seems to care, very much. But TribeJay says it best when he says LaPorta’s “baseball instincts are poor.” Indeed.
Yeah, he put a good swing on the ball, was just a tad tardy. It was a good swing, he fouled it back. And yes, it cost him.
Brantley is a much different hitter…but since you brought him up, if he didn’t get jammed on that inside fastball back on the third and had gotten Kipnis in, maybe the LaPorta at-bat doesn’t need to occur.
Yes, this all reminds me of the “it doesn’t matter when the 15-30 stretch happens” with regards to the Twins.
LaPorta’s the scapegoat because he was Te last player to not execute, but a string of guys didn’t execute before him. The team was 0-7 RISP. That’s a good way to lose, no matter what happens in the 9th.
Bottom line: the offense is bad enough that I never expect them to win. 9th inning heroics are awesome but they don’t erase the previous 8 innings.
by afh4 on Jul 27, 2011 9:12 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
This is probably the long and short of it. LaPorta failed, and his failure was just the last in a long succession of failures.
Steel Nick
Right. Brantley hit into a DP as the second batter in the 8th, with the heart of the lineup coming up. And failed to hit a sac fly in the 3rd. And hit into another DP in the 6th. The last mistake is, by definition, the worst one, the fatal one, the most gut wrenching one. But it’s a link in a chain of mistakes.
by afh4 on Jul 27, 2011 9:29 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I’m talking about run expectancy in a given situation not win expectancy so it shouldn’t have anything to do with which inning it came in. LaPorta’s GDP delivered the biggest hit to our run expectancy in any single at bat all night. There were plenty of other large negatives for his to contend with and it wasn’t even remotely close.
This kind of analysis? Is run expectancy changes not just quantifying each of the “links in a chain of mistakes” in your own analysis?
I’m simply saying that LaPorta’s “link” would have been more atrocious than all the rest regardless of what inning it happened in and not just simply the worst because it was the last.
This. I sense a souring around the team, and desperation seems to be setting in a bit. Losses are taking on huge import.
LaPorta has been a non-factor most of the year, so his weak performance doesn’t especially stand. Early in the season many players were contributing to scoring in RISP situations, but that is different now.
If we can get to early August still in the hunt anything can still happen (if Choo hits when he returns), but if we drop off the radar between now and then at least our young players are getting great MLB prep time. Honestly, though, I’d rather just win.
Well, for one thing, you’re losing a 1-run game to Jered Weaver … and you beat Dan Haren (not technically) the night before.
In 2010, that would make most fans ecstatic. In 2011, after the brilliant start, it’s not good enough.
Good point. We don’t want to overlook Tomlin’s good start, bouncing back from some bad outings the past month or so. We need him to continue giving us solid starts if we have any chance of staying in the playoff race.
by Buckeye Brad on Jul 27, 2011 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions
thats why I will not just start to blame LaPorta and use him as the scapegoat. When an offense only scores 1 run, even with Ervin Santana pitching, it has to be more than 1 guys fault.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
If you’re going to make bad contact on a 3-2 pitch, you let it go. A strikeout there is an infinitely better result
Lou Marson fan.
by Gradyforpresident on Jul 27, 2011 7:51 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Yeah, this is a very silly line of argument. The whole premise of being jammed is that you swing at a pitch you can’t hit. It happens dozens of times each day during the summer, and it’s not because all those guys have a desire to make bad contact. It’s a difficult thing to avoid, something pitchers are using as a weapon.
I’m not a major league baseball player?
Lou Marson fan.
by Gradyforpresident on Jul 27, 2011 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions
But yes, what I should have said is, sit in a zone, and if you don’t get that pitch and spot, take it.
Lou Marson fan.
by Gradyforpresident on Jul 27, 2011 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions
And what I think’s being said in response is that’s incredibly difficult. Hence, why Bobby Abreu has been so well paid for so long, and Matt LaPorta will not be.
I often feel like we (myself included) try to attribute player errors to a lousy strategy, when the reality is deficit of necessary talent.
I have to agree here. He looked bad on the second strike, but that was a filthy 3-2 pitch.
Now, as to whether or not he got out of the box fast enough in order to break up the double play, that’s another matter entirely.
It wasn’t a close play at 1B; I don’t think the jump mattered.
I actually thought it was sort of an impressive AB, if the result’s ignored. He went down 0-2 and got to a full count, right? All game I was impressed at his ability to lay off breaking stuff, which is usually his bugaboo.
Evan noted quite a few times last night that he had a fastball down the pipe that he fouled off on the first pitch
Lou Marson fan.
by Gradyforpresident on Jul 27, 2011 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions
And that means it’s not a good AB? It’s a 99 mph fastball. I understand he didn’t do what we wanted, but I just can’t understand the desire to parse his performance this way. He’s not a very good player, like most of our offense. Do we want to go find the pitches that other guys fouled off? Is our expectation actually that these players do something positive with fastballs down the pipe? Because a whole hell of a lot of them aren’t doing that. Kipnis also fouled a fastball back in his AB.
Within the context of who he is, I thought it was staggering that he fought back to a full count and impressive compared to what I expected.
Watch the at bat again. It’s not impressive. None of the balls were reasonably close enough to induce a swing.
Look, you can argue that blaming it all on LaPorta is silly. And it is. But to say that he should be patted on the back for “fighting back” is equally silly.
And yes, I’m tough on power hitters who miss thigh-high fastballs in the middle of the plate. Those are important mistakes on which to capitalize.
I’m not patting anyone on the back but this whole conversation is premised on LaPorta being somehow competent. First off, LaPorta swings at tons of pitches that are not anywhere near reasonably close. Second, LaPorta is slugging .394 (!!) in 900 career PAs. He is neither a player that one can expect to lay off anything nor a player that you can reasonably describe as a major league power hitter.
He is a first baseman who was batting 7th on a very poor offensive team.
The only thing about the play that I found shocking or out of line with my expectations was that he found a way to generate 2 outs and not score a run, but that’s just an odd set of circumstances (his speed, where he hit the ball, Orlando not getting a great break). I thought we had two chances for overmatched players to hit sac flies and I hoped one of them would do it—it sucks Kipnis didn’t get a chance, but he didn’t look capable anyway.
I feel bad slagging off LaPorta in a game in which he hit a home run, but that AB in the 9th was the worst since the Frozen Carlos at-bat back in April. Can’t say what he was thinking, but it sure wasn’t ‘run as fast as possible to first base.’
Glad I missed this one. Just watched a lot of Pirates and Braves into the 19th inning. Maybe the worst call I’ve ever seen at home plate to end the game. Lugo was out by about three feet. Can’t think of anything that compares, probably not even the blown call by Jim Joyce that went for the Tribe in Galarragas “perfect” game last year.
Il faut d'abord durer.
Was just going to post about this. That call is honestly one of the worst I’ve seen in any sport. Atrocious. Feel for the Pirates.
Had that call happened to us we’d be apoplectic.
Lou Marson fan.
by Gradyforpresident on Jul 27, 2011 7:55 AM EDT up reply actions
I made a call like that once, the only time in my life I umpired a competitive softball game. I called a ball in the dirt as strike three at a moment in the game that would go on to be the difference-making inning. Umpiring is hard.
Which is why someone who umps like me shouldn’t be in the majors. That was pathetic.
It’s not even that Meals shouldn’t be in the majors. Umps make mistakes, it happens. There should just be 90 seconds to look at a GD monitor and get the call right. I can’t believe Selig et al would rather end the game that way (both teams in a pennant race, by the way) than “slow down the game” in any fashion.
It’s going to happen during a playoff game, maybe an elimination one, and Selig will pretend they had no way of preparing for a bad, game-changing call like that. Just put an ump in the booth, or have a monitor in the hallway to the clubhouses.
This is worse than the Joyce call. The Tigers won that game.
Steel Nick
At least Donald was just a step away from 1st. Lugo was three feet from home.
Lou Marson fan.
by Gradyforpresident on Jul 27, 2011 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions
The distance from home plate is beside the point — the umpire called him safe because he thought the catcher missed the tag. The throw clearly beat the runner; that wasn’t why the umpire called him safe. You have to at least give Meals credit for speaking to reporters after the game to explain the call. Many umpires don’t do that.
And I still haven’t seen a replay which definitively shows that the catcher did tag the runner. It certainly looked like he did, but there could have been a half inch between his glove and the runner’s leg which we can’t see on TV that the umpire saw. I’m not saying that’s true but we can’t be 100% sure he got it wrong.
by Buckeye Brad on Jul 27, 2011 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions
The question nobody is asking is why the catcher did a swipe tag when it wasn’t necessary? He had plenty of time to lay his mitt on the runner to make it obvious he tagged him.
by Buckeye Brad on Jul 27, 2011 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions
I know, but the umpire thought he missed the runner with his sweep tag. The umpire might have been incorrect, and maybe it was a bad call, but the catcher could have avoided giving the umpire the chance to screw up the call by making sure he places the tag on his leg and keep it there — that’s how I almost always see catchers do it.
by Buckeye Brad on Jul 27, 2011 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions
Wow, I just went back and watched the play because of this conversation. What a dreadful call. The catcher did nothing wrong there — he tagged the runner and held the ball up for the umpire to see it.
I’m just not certain he tagged the runner. On one angle of the replay they showed this morning, when he swoops the tag I don’t see the glove move at all, like it would if it touched the runner, so maybe he did miss his leg by a fraction of an inch. I certainly could be wrong about that, because the replay wasn’t conclusive, but the umpire was right there and thought he missed the tag.
But I don’t know what the catcher holding the ball up for the umpire to see it has to do with anything. The point is that if the catcher holds the tag on the leg, like they do most times, then this isn’t an issue and the runner is called out. Again, maybe it was a bad call and the catcher did make the tag, but you can’t argue that he couldn’t have applied the tag better because he certainly could have.
by Buckeye Brad on Jul 27, 2011 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions
I felt the same way after watching the replay on MLB.com. The biggest reason I still believe he was out was the shocked expression from the runner when he was called safe. I don’t think you react that way if you didn’t get tagged.
He had an opportunity for an inning-ending double play there, because the batter fell on his face. If you lay on the runner, you probably lose that. He made a tag, held the ball up and went to throw.
The replay looks like he tags him, and Lugo clearly knows that he was tagged. I have a hard time blaming a guy who did make the tag for not doing it prettily enough.
I’d like to weigh in and say that I don’t think this was a candidate for worst call ever. The catcher almost completely missed the tag. Which is an out, and the call was wrong. But the tag was made with an inch of the thumb-side of the glove, which the umpire couldn’t see. From most angles the swipe appears to pass by the runner totally unimpeded.
Of course I said nothing about not doing it “prettily” enough.
by Buckeye Brad on Jul 27, 2011 6:44 PM EDT up reply actions
I can’t believe Selig et al would rather end the game that way (both teams in a pennant race, by the way) than "slow down the game" in any fashion.
What does he believe is worse in terms of slowing down the game? Replay to make sure the call is right, or the Red Sox seemingly taking 20 seconds in between every pitch?
Close games are always killers because there are so many moments that could have meant a different result.
One of those moments: LaPorta up with a guy on first and second and really creams a pitch that just kind of dies out in deep center. If he is just a fraction of a second early or late on that pitch he’s smacking it off a wall or maybe even a 3 run homer.
There were a few of ABs in the middle innings that I thought Indians had a chance to take Weaver out of the park. One of Asdrubal’s, a fly to RF, stands out.
by afh4 on Jul 27, 2011 9:14 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I’m shocked that today’s fan confidence poll is up around 75%. We’re sliding out of relevancy and I have no idea what is supposed to fix that.
Every time I’ve ever voted in the fan confidence poll, dating back a year or whatever, I’ve voted 100%.
by afh4 on Jul 27, 2011 9:15 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Same here. I do that at every site I’m on. Even when the Cavs were losing 20-some games in a row I still gave them 100%. It’s such a stupid poll.
by Buckeye Brad on Jul 27, 2011 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions
Hoynes reporting that Beltran exercised his no-trade clause to block a trade to the Tribe.
http://www.cleveland.com/tribe/index.ssf/2011/07/cleveland_indians_rebuffed_in.html
It wasn’t mentioned in the recap, but Mathis made some brilliant plays behind the plate in that last inning to block balls that could have easily been wild pitches. Even that high fastball on the 2-2 count to Laporta could have went to the backstop.

by 















