Mid-Season Prospect Report (Akron/Kinston)
Unlike Columbus, Akron is not steamrolling their opponents. After consistently being one of the organization's winningest teams for over a decade, Akron is trodding along at .500 (43-43), with the season characterized largely by erratic and disappointing performances. Kinston (47-35) has fared better on the strength of excellent pitching, but outside of Drew Pomeranz, there has been less to get excited about than what it looked like in March. There are a lot of names here, but most of these guys were marginal prospects at best entering the season, so "holding steady" is not really a step in the right direction.
Rising:
Drew Pomeranz (22.6, LHP): Pomeranz is "rising" only in the sense that he is doing an excellent job of making a strong first impression. Highly regarded coming into his debut season, Pomeranz has not disappointed while regularly outmatching Carolina league opponents (77 IP, 56 H, 2 HR, 32 BB, 95 K). The only marginal criticism would be occasional control problems and low pitch efficiency leading, together with close club management, to short outings. The next test, which should be soon, will come in Akron.
Falling:
Nick Weglarz (23.5, OF): Yet another injury, and Weglarz is still in Akron. He is putting up a typically bizarre, but uninspring line of .195/.404/.351. Beginning to think Weglarz is never going to work...
Matt Packer (23.9, LHP): Packer was a surprise sensation last season, but has crashed hard in Akron. He is still showing excellent control, but is otherwise getting rocked.
Joe Gardner (23.2, RHP): Gardner was one of my favorite prospects coming into the season after eviscerating the Midwest League last year with his power sinker. The pitch has lost some of its bit this year in Akron, with a drop in both Ks and GBs. Like Packer, he basically skipped Kinston altogether, suggesting they both may be dealing with significant adjustment to higher levels of competition.
Juan Diaz (22.5, 2B/SS): The most recent Latin American infielder acquired from Seattle, Juan Diaz still has impressive size and is reasonably young, but...76 Ks in 83 games and poor power don't suggest positive things for his future.
Kyle Bellows (22.9, 3B): Another guy I had high hopes for, Bellows is rated as an excellent defensive third baseman. His bat, however, has been miserable in Akron; .209/.287/.300.
Bo Greenwell (22.7, OF): Looked like he was starting to do some things well in Lake County the first half of last season, but since his promotion to Kinston a year ago it has been steadily downhill. This season, even his characteristically excellent plate discipline has deteriorated.
Tyler Holt (22.3, CF): The Indians are cornering the market on speedy, high OBP, zero power centerfielders. Tyler Holt was supposed to be better than that, but so far (.254/.371/.322), has not been.
Abner Abreu (21.8, OF): After putting up impressive power for a 19-year old at Lake County two years ago, Abreu's career has been derailed by a shoulder injury and poor plate discipline. Now in Kinston, Abreu is looking more like a speedy/weak power corner outfielder (still with horrendous plate approach problems) than the raw power athlete he did two seasons ago.
TJ House (21.9, LHP): In his second stint with Kinston, House's numbers are getting worse, not better (second straight year of rising walks, decreasing strikeouts).
Holding Steady:
Austin Adams (24.9, RHP): Adams is not young, but as a converted pitcher he is still learning the craft. He has had some bad luck with balls in play and issued far too many free passes (11.8 BB%), but he has also shown flashes of potential. His strong K-rate (23.3%) is a nice positive indicator.
Kelvin De La Cruz (23.5, LHP): While he isn't pitching well, Kelvin is throwing up big enough strikeout numbers (23.9%) to be interesting given his age and size. He has significant mechanical issues to still be sorted out, indicated by his horrendous control problems (15.1 BB%).
TJ McFarland (22.0, LHP): McFarland has not been much more than a steady innings eater, but he is young and left-handed.
Brett Brach (23.2, RHP): Brach continues to generate success by keeping opposing hitters off-balance and inducing weak contact. His three-year batting-average-against numbers; .215, .268, .205. Not a lot of excitement, otherwise.
Giovanny Soto (20.1, LHP): If Soto had not gotten himself injured and ended up on the DL in June, I probably would have had him join Pomeranz as a riser. Excellent numbers all around, but needs to be healthy.
Clayton Cook (20.9, RHP): Young, tall, above average numbers across the board. But nothing, and he never has put up anything, well above average. In need of some kind of a breakout to get any attention.
Chun-Hsiu Chen (22.7, C): Holding steady for Chen is actually a good thing, as it suggests his breakout last season is for real. Still has excellent hitting tools (.272/.313/.464), though he has had a worrying drop in plate discipline this season.
Jordan Henry (23.0, CF): Ezequiel Carrera's replacement is still in place (.264/.370/.296).
Tyler Cannon (23.9, U): Cannon has played at three levels already this season (LC, Kinston, Akron) and has played every position on the infield, LF and DH....all of which is to say it is a little hard to evaluate his body of work. He hit the ball extremely well in LC, but needs to show he can do it at higher levels now.
Cory Burns (23.7, RHP): Given the freakish strikeout numbers he was putting up early in the season, it might be surprising that I have not listed Burns as a riser. A close look at this numbers reveal, however, that while he has still been very effective (he hasn't allowed a run since May), the deception from his strange delivery seems to be losings its effectiveness against Eastern League batters. In April and May he struck out 32 batters in just 20 innings. Since that time, he has dropped below a K/IP. His status has certainly gone up, but I'm worried he is a bubble stock.
Bryan Price (24.7, RHP), Preston Guilmet (23.9, RHP), Marty Popham (23.9, RHP): Consider this trio as a stand-in for the swath of relievers scattered across Kinston and Akron who continue to put up some solid numbers. Others would include Tyler Sturdevant, Jose Flores, Eric Berger, Toru Murato, Francisco Jimenez, Matt Langwell....
70 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Silver lining on Gardner & KdK is the low jack rate 0 they’re both keeping it in the park.
"(We) did not generally despise those trades. We despised being in the position where we had to make them" -Jay
Keep in mind, Canal Park (Akron) has been a pretty significant HR-suppressing park since it was opened
by APV on Jul 8, 2011 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Hard for me to be too concerned about Packer when he has a K/BB of nearly 4 and a GB% of 50%. His ERA is irrelevant.
Also, I am way down on Pomeranz. He should be dominating High A and he isn’t. Shame we didn’t draft Ranaudo.
LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.
by Joe. on Jul 8, 2011 12:56 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
How would you define “dominating?” He leads the Carolina league in ERA, is second in K%, third in FIP, and top 10 in GB%. What more would you like?
by APV on Jul 8, 2011 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions
You already touched on what more I would like. There is no excuse for it when he is 22 and in High A.
LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.
by Joe. on Jul 8, 2011 1:17 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Precisely.
LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.
by Joe. on Jul 8, 2011 1:34 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
So Baseball-Reference tells me that the only starting pitcher in last year’s 1st round (including supplemental picks) who has pitched above A+ is the #7 pick, Matt Harvey, who was just promoted two weeks ago. Chance Ruffin and Chris Sale have both done so as relievers.
by APV on Jul 8, 2011 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions
He should have said not the average 5th pick.
LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.
by Joe. on Jul 8, 2011 2:19 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Seems like he’s been working on pitches rather than stats?
by Jay on Jul 8, 2011 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions
And yet, of the 313 batters he’s faced, 95 of them have whiffed.
by The DiaTriber on Jul 8, 2011 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Yep…he’s working on refining his secondary stuff and still striking out 30% of the batters he faces. Not getting 30% of his outs via the K (which is a K/9 over 8), striking out 30% of the batters he faces
by The DiaTriber on Jul 8, 2011 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Interesting. Law had a glowing report from a scout on Ranaudo last week and the same scout called Pomeranz a reliever.
LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.
by Joe. on Jul 8, 2011 1:09 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Packer, meanwhile, since his promotion to Akron from LC last season, has seen significant spikes in his BB-rate (3.5% > 5.5% – still an excellent number, of course), HR/FB (4% > 7%), BABIP (.282 > .333), while seeing significant declines in his K-rate (24.5% > 18%) and GB-rate (62% > 52%). I see reasons to be concerned.
by APV on Jul 8, 2011 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Oh, come on.
LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.
by Joe. on Jul 8, 2011 2:14 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Yeah, but on the other hand … oh, come on, yourself.
by Jay on Jul 8, 2011 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions
(added the final comma at the last minute … preview mode is good)
by Jay on Jul 8, 2011 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
I was just reading up on Dillon Howard. Too late.
LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.
by Joe. on Jul 8, 2011 5:40 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 2 recs
Why is that?
LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.
by Joe. on Jul 8, 2011 3:48 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
(via Tony) Here is Ross Atkins on Pomeranz:
"He is dominating that level. He has been everything we have hoped from a scouting standpoint, and everything we had hoped from the performance and as a person. The power to his stuff and the dominance to his fastball has been what has really stood out. He hasn’t really needed his secondary weapons, and we have forced him to use them. There have been slight limitations we have been working on within the smaller aspects of the game. Controlling the running game and the pitch usage are things he did not have to do as an amateur. We want to force them to happen and make sure there is a foundation that he can fall back on. Now it is time to see the next challenge for him. We need to get him moving at some point."
by APV on Jul 8, 2011 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions
The walk numbers will probably spike in AA.
LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.
by Joe. on Jul 8, 2011 2:20 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
What’s your reasoning behind that?
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
He’s showing bad control while being old for his level. Once he faces real competition, it’s only inevitable.
LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.
by Joe. on Jul 8, 2011 4:00 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
You are being crazy now. His control is essentially major league average, which is to say he walks about 10% of the batters he faces. He is younger than the average pitcher in his league, so in no way is he old for his level.
by APV on Jul 8, 2011 5:24 PM EDT up reply actions
Why are we comparing a top prospect to the average aged player in his minor league level?This is insane and I have never seen it done before. You don’t have to be John Sickels to know that the average player in the Carolina League, or in any league in the minors, is not a prospect.
He is old for his level.
LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.
by Joe. on Jul 8, 2011 5:38 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
He is flat out not. Compare him to the other people he was drafted with. Exactly one starting pitcher has been above his level, and he has made a total of 3 starts. You are being crazy on this.
by APV on Jul 8, 2011 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions
I mean it’s not written down somewhere; it’s just something understood. Of course, it’s very rare to start someone in AA after they’re drafted (though it does happen). It’s no fault of Pomeranz that they started him where they did, but it is fault that his walk rate is this high and it is quite concerning.
LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.
by Joe. on Jul 9, 2011 4:55 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Since his promotion to Akron came through today are you relieved? Do you view him any differently? Personally, I find no reason to fault Pomeranz for a marginally high walk-rate when it is known that he is specifically working on his secondary stuff.
by APV on Jul 9, 2011 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Not marginally high. Anyway, I was simply making a projection given his numbers and based on his age and level of competition. If he makes the necessary adjustments at AA, awesome. I am not actively rooting against one of our top prospects.
LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.
by Joe. on Jul 11, 2011 1:48 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
The proper comparison is to 3-year college pitchers making their debut seasons. And I would bet the vast majority of them do not spend more than a half season at AA their first year, if that.
by APV on Jul 8, 2011 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions
This is sarcastic right? I’m like 90% sure, but it’s the internet.
LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.
by Joe. on Jul 8, 2011 3:50 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
It’s fine to be down on Pomeranz, but “shame we didn’t draft” the guy that had a 7.22 ERA his junior year at LSU and had some serious questions regarding his elbow? I saw Ranaudo pitch his sophomore year at LSU and thought he was a good pitching prospect, but this guy had some serious red flags last year. Yeah, let’s take the guy that isn’t pitching well, has elbow problems and is losing velocity over the healthy lefty that just dominated the best conference in baseball and K’d 263 in 196 IP his soph and junior seasons.
It’s not like he’s doing so much better this year, either. Ranaudo’s numbers in high A aren’t really even that good. Pomeranz is not without his short-comings, but BA just ranked him to be the 14th best prospect in the minors. I don’t mean to rip on Ranaudo b/c I’ve liked him for years now, but taking that guy with the elbow problems he was having his junior season at 5th overall would have been pretty careless.
by OhioTommy on Jul 8, 2011 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Let me be clear on something that is being misinterpreted: I do not think Pomeranz was a bad pick. I loved it then, and I still like it now. It was a very different draft than this year’s in that there weren’t a lot of different ways we could have gone. Ranaudo would have gone ahead of Pomeranz had the injury concerns not been there. All I was saying was that it was a shame we didn’t get him now that he appears healthy. The difference between the players isn’t huge, but Ranaudo does have a higher upside. That is all.
LGT's resident moderate Yankee hating fan.
by Joe. on Jul 11, 2011 1:20 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
One thing to keep in mind about Akron and Kinston, and this is really true system-wide, is that the organization has gotten quite young. Akron has the youngest pitching staff in the EL with guys average in the low 23s for age, and their hitters are only a tad older. Same thing is basically true for Kinston. In addition to the trend towards big-framed pitchers, there seems to be a concerted effort to push younger players.
One positive about Bellows is that he seems to have figured some things out recently – as bad as his line is, he was much worse in April-May, and has actually been hitting moderately well in June-July. 287/362/383 since June 1.
by InfiniteMonkeyTypists on Jul 8, 2011 2:41 PM EDT reply actions
except he was supposed to have intriguing power, no?
Being a smart-ass is preferable to the alternative
I do not know. If so, it appears to be intriguing like the Yeti, in that it is rarely seen. Perhaps it is lurking in the forests of the Pacific Northwest. We’ll trade him to the Mariners.
by InfiniteMonkeyTypists on Jul 8, 2011 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Off-topic, but the Cleveland Indians are currently trending #2 on Yahoo.
by kennesawmountainwahoo on Jul 8, 2011 2:42 PM EDT reply actions
I’ll wait for AP’s response. Not sure what GeoSpaces is.
by kennesawmountainwahoo on Jul 8, 2011 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions
A virtual collaborative software environment for interactive analysis and visualization of geospatial information?
Being a smart-ass is preferable to the alternative
Or age-addled brains failing to remember the proper name for GeoCities, which was purchased by Yahoo! anyway and therefore not that different in the first place.
How we doing on Excite or Lycos or WebCrawler?
GeoCities was closed a year or so ago. Which sucks, because I lost a bunch of profiles from the old site.
Back in the day, it was the place to go if you wanted a free place to host some files.
Then I look at Yahoo 5 minutes later, they are gone from the top 10.
by kennesawmountainwahoo on Jul 8, 2011 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Right now, The Chiz is trending #1. By the time I am done typing, I am sure that he will also disappear from the list.
by kennesawmountainwahoo on Jul 8, 2011 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions

by 















