Game 115: Tigers 4, Indians 3
After Asdrubal Cabrera's two-run double in the third inning, the Indians were on the cusp of tying the game. But the Indians never mounted that cusp, and the ended with it still in front of them.
Justin Verlander was on the mound, so runs were going to be at a premium, and the Indians took this to heart. When Lonnie Chisenhall threw high to first in the first inning, first base Carlos Santana did not leap to catch the ball, but allowed it to go into the camera bay, alloing Austin Jackson to go to second base. The play would have been an error even if Santana catches the ball, but because he didn't, Jackson would score an early run, and as it turned out, was the difference in the game. After the inning, Asdrubal Cabrera verbally chewed out Santana in the dugout, and their teammates had to separate them. The mental mistake (not placing a premium on keeping the ball in front of him) was the impetus for the confrontation, and it was good that his teammate was the one delivering the message rather than the coaching staff, not only because Cabrera recognized the problem or took the initiative to correct it immediately. That particular play may not happen for the rest of the season, but there will be hundreds of small decisions just like the one that Santana made that could mean the difference between a one-run loss and walk-off victory in extra innings. It's the coaching staff's job to make sure these plays get made, but the job is a whole lot easier when peer pressure (especially coming the best position player on the club) is added to authoritative instruction.
Carmona would give up three runs in the second, though he wasn't hit all that hard. Peralta singled with one out on a broken-bat blooper, and the three run-scoring hits were all infield or ground-ball singles. The Tigers got their third run of the inning on a safety squeeze executed well by Austin Jackson.
Carlos Santana made up on offense for what he gave up on defense in the bottom of the second. He took Verlander deep to put the Indians on the board. In the next inning, Asdrubal Cabrera got the Indians to within a run when he doubled down the left field line. Magglio Ordonez couldn't get over to cut the ball off, and that allowed Jason Kipnis to scored from first.
That's the way the score remained. Carmona settled down after the second inning, and would go seven innings, allowing seven hits and two walks, and no runs from the third inning onward. But Verlander would match the scoreless frames as he went seven as well, striking out ten and allowing three hits and three walks. It seemed at times as if Verlander didn't really have his command, but he still made a quality start despite making a couple mistakes. He almost gave up the lead in the sixth, when Santana connected on a ball low in the strike zone and drove it to straightaway center. But Austin Jackson made an outstanding leaping grab, and may have taken a two-run homer away. That was the first of 11 straight batters retired by Verlander and the Detroit bullpen.

| Highest WPA | Lowest WPA | ||
| Cabrera | .112 | Carrera | -.156 |
| Smith | .048 | Fukudome | -.120 |
| Sipp | .035 | Hafner | -.097 |
71 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
In case anyone was wondering, shortly after the ninth inning ended, I passed a horrifyingly large Rally Tonsil Stone. Unfortunately, it was too late to save today’s game.
You know what? I was wondering what those were called. Thanks for sharing.
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge..." C. Darwin
by Spidey on Aug 12, 2011 2:22 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Never go to a game again, please
by tr1betime on Aug 12, 2011 9:19 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Sorry, I have tickets for a Royals game in a few weeks. If they lose that one, I will seriously consider not going though!
by sandyalomarfan on Aug 12, 2011 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions
I feel ya. I’ve been to five not-in-Cleveland games so far. Home team’s won every one of them. Hoping for good results when I go up to Cleveland in two weeks.
Sigh. Jealous. The only win I saw was the suicide squeeze against Boston in 40F wind chill weather. We left during the 7th inning since no one could feel his/her extremities..
Important to remember that the Indians are only 2 games back in the loss column and have played 2 less games than the tigers. They won’t catch up in total games played until September 19/20 with makeup games against the Mariners and White Sox. An obvious point, but I think it drives the point home even more that this team controls its own destiny.
2 fewer games
@grantgw - sports and Cleveland and Columbus stuff
by woodsmeister on Aug 12, 2011 9:09 AM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
Going .500 in 10 games against division leaders – 7 of them on road would always be encouraging. Losing those 5 games by a total of 6 runs is even better.
by Harry Doyle on Aug 12, 2011 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
its frustrating that we lost those games by so close, but its encouraging for the potential of the team the way they are playing right now. Even with going 5-5, they had a +10 run differential which shows they did not have the greatest fortune in close games.
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
didn’t get to see the game, or gamecast it even. But it seems like we actually hit Verlander hard on occassion and Varmona only had one poor inning.
Would have loved to get within 1 game, but being 3 back is not a terrible thing at this point.
What we need to focus on is to win every series from here on out. And perhaps take a few sweeps as well. Our schedule is downright favorable the rest of the way:
Aug: Twins, @White Sox, @Tigers, Mariners, Royals, A’s
Sept: @Royals, Tigers, @White Sox, @Rangers, @Twins, Mariners (1-makeup), White Sox, Twins @Tigers.
The Tigers have a similar schedule, only out of divison they play @Orioles, @Rays, @A’s, Orioles
As long as we take care of business within the division, we really have a good chance.
Weak schedule, sure, but am I wrong in thinking we’re always up to our necks in it whenever we face the White Sox and Twins? Just a feeling…
Agreed. I think the next 9 games are going to reveal whether this team really has a chance or not. So far this season we’ve been horrible against the ChiSox and not much better against the Twins. That has to change, preferably starting tonight. 5-4 over the next 9 would be encouraging going into a long homestand against some of the worst teams in the league.
by thestreaksofbenfrancisco on Aug 12, 2011 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Hate to say it, but im not sure 5-4 is going to cut it, either. Rest assured Detroit will not go 5-4 against the dregs.
"Mixed emotions. Rather see him hit PEDroia [with that pitch]. I don’t care if he is in the dugout"
by Gradysmanldy on Aug 12, 2011 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions
*likely not
"Mixed emotions. Rather see him hit PEDroia [with that pitch]. I don’t care if he is in the dugout"
by Gradysmanldy on Aug 12, 2011 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions
We make two trips to both Boston and Texas this year? That’s just craptastic. The unbalanced schedule is bad enough when you deal with the inequities of interleague play, but the inequities of intraleague play are pretty ridiculous as well.
Screw interleague play. Bring back the balanced schedule.
@grantgw - sports and Cleveland and Columbus stuff
by woodsmeister on Aug 12, 2011 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Screw interleague is right.
And throw the DH out while you’re at it.
by JulioBernazard on Aug 12, 2011 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Screw mid-’70s “innovations” to pump up fan interest.
by JulioBernazard on Aug 12, 2011 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions
This. I’d rather have actual hitters in the lineup than having to watch pitchers hit, which always leads to too much bunting and “strategy” by managers.
by Buckeye Brad on Aug 12, 2011 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Screw one-dimensional players (other than Pronk).
by JulioBernazard on Aug 12, 2011 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Collectively, 2011 pitchers have produced a 359 OPS. But they’ve dropped down 472 electrifying sac bunts this year.
by YoDaddyWags on Aug 13, 2011 8:41 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
we don’t HAVE to win every series against the tigers, but we have to win at least 2 out of the 3 series and 3 would be great. I think we should win against the twins in this upcoming series
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
In August, the Tribe has played 10 games, all against first-place teams. They’ve entered the eighth inning leading, tied or trailing by a single run in all ten. I’ll take that, all things considered.
I’d definintely agree, especially with a health Choo coming back. He could account for one+ runs a night (or at least he will/does in my head!)
Fear the Fedora.
by MooneysRebellion on Aug 12, 2011 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions
<———— I like her much better than Mauer
and I suspect she has as much power as he does.
by JulioBernazard on Aug 12, 2011 10:14 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
At least she’s not lurking over there, looking creepy.
by sandyalomarfan on Aug 12, 2011 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions
ARE YOU KIDDING ME? the tigers get the ORIOLES this weekend!!??
oh well, guess we’ll just have to sweep the twins.
LGMasterson, LGChooHopefullyOffTheDLTonightOrThisWeekend, LGSweep
Kearns DFA’d
AND THE PEOPLE REJOICE!
Fear the Fedora.
by MooneysRebellion on Aug 12, 2011 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions
I think a sweep is definitely not out of the question. You have masterson and Tomlin going the first 2 games and then the 3rd you have Huff against Kevin Slowey who hasn’t pitched since may.
I know you can never take a series for granted, but I am more worried about the series against the White Sox
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Then you haven’t watched many CHW-CLE series this year.
by JulioBernazard on Aug 12, 2011 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions
what do you mean? We haven’t done well against Chicago, why should I worry less about them than the twins?
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Assuming we get something resembling 2010 Choo (and his 6.5 WAR) back today, he should be worth 2 additional wins over the final 47 games of the season. And that assumes that Kearns/Duncan/etc would have played at replacement level in his place.
Completely agree. More of a hope, although 2011 Choo’s Wins Above Austin Kearns might be higher than 2010 Choo’s WAR.
I think WAAK is how we should evaluate all future 4th outfielders.
by Toxicadam on Aug 12, 2011 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
even if we get a Choo resembling how he was hitting before that DUI messed with his head (.725 OPS, .150 ISO, a handful of steals) I would be ecstatic. Because he has good power, even Choo when that DUI messed up his head could be an offensive upgrade over Zeke
I teach good life choices. That’s why I almost didn’t graduate High School.
Intensive Purposes? I could care less...
your whole argument is a fallacy!
Did anyone listen to the radio last night and hear the discussion about Jiminez and Carmona apparently developing a positive (read: competitive) relationship? If this is true and it goes well, it’s like getting TWO starters for TWO prospects!
Wouldn’t Santana, as a catcher, have the whole “keeping the ball in front of you is a priority” mantra pounded into his brain by now? I mean I get that there is a different mindset to playing 1st but it is surprising to see a catcher seem to put so little emphasis on at least knowcking that ball down. Santana got, at most, 4 inches off the ground.
Also… Woo hoo for Choo!
I didn’t see the play. After what happened with Pujols, was he worried about getting hit by the runner?
by JulioBernazard on Aug 12, 2011 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Nah, it was a high throw that he barely jumped for, maybe a step away from the bag. As far as an exact Pujols comp, it was high so no chance of his arm getting caught, Unless he just has no hops whatsoever, it was a play he could have/should have made. It would have taken him off the bag but kept Jackson at first.
Have you watched Santana behind the plate this year? Keeping the ball in front of him hasn’t seemed a priority. Santana should never, ever catch Jimenez.
Yeah I thought about going there with it but since you did, I will agree that he has regressed as a catcher, which is to be expected when you are shuttling him back and forth between 1st and catcher. Seems Acta already figured that out though, as Marson was behind the plate on Wednesday.
Yeah, Tony Lastoria brought up the development issues that the time-share is likely causing. It will be interesting to see how they treat it next season—I do not think Santana would be playing this much first if they weren’t contending.
I do not think Santana would be playing this much first if we had a first baseman worthy of running out there every day. It will be interesting to see what happens going forward with Nick Johnson.
@grantgw - sports and Cleveland and Columbus stuff
by woodsmeister on Aug 12, 2011 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions
We’re going to trade for a young 1B in the offseason, right?
Lou Marson fan. Jason Donald advocate.
by Gradyforpresident on Aug 13, 2011 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions

by 















