The starting rotation: Lowe and Slowey
This is the first in a series of pieces previewing the Indians starting rotation options heading into 2012
Derek Lowe was not a well-liked man in Atlanta, which is part of the reason the Braves were willing to pay $10M just to see him leave. This, despite the fact that Derek Lowe was quite Derek Lowe-like in 2011. A quick perusal of his peripheral numbers shows that he was his usual steady self in mixing an excellent GB-rate (59%) with a decent strikeout rate (16%), the mix he has used throughout his largely successful career. Lowe showed a bit of an upward tick in his BB-rate, moving up a notch from 7.4% to 8.4%, but some of his troubles last season were the result of bad luck. His BABIP was atypically high (.327 vs. .295 career average) and the Braves' bullpen didn't do him too many favors (65.9 LOB%). But Atlanta can be forgiven for not enjoying Lowe's role (0-5, 8.75 ERA) in their historic September collapse.
The bigger issue with Lowe is that over the past two seasons, while still being very much Derek Lowe, he has become something of a sink or swim pitcher. After holding a steady quality start % right around or above 60 for five straight years, that number has dipped each of the past two seasons to 45% and 41%. Part of this was the bullpen's fault a year ago, but it also reflects Lowe's declining consistency. Paralleling this is Lowe's declining usage. While he has been a steady 32+ game starter for every season over the past decade, his innings per start reached a low of 5.5 last season. Lowe's addition looks on paper to be an improvement to the Tribe's staff, but one that will also necessitate increased bullpen usage. Jordan Bastian was talking the other day about finding relievers to fill in the garbage time, and that might be nowhere more apparent than on days Lowe takes the mound.
| Derek Lowe | W-L | ERA | BB% | K% | GB% | OPS | IP |
| 2011 | 9-17 | 5.05 | 8.4 | 16.5 | 59.0 | .754 | 187.0 |
| (2009-2011) | 13-13 | 4.57 | 7.7 | 15.3 | 58.2 | .761 | 192.0 |
| Career | 166-146 | 3.94 | 6.9 | 15.6 | 62.6 | .755 | 2515.2 |
Slowey is covered, after the jump.
Slowey, unlike Lowe, has no guarantee of a rotation spot heading into camp. Indeed, given his option status, the Indians might have some incentive of making sure Slowey spends at least a few months in Columbus in 2012. Slowey's most recent performance is also, arguably, even more disastrous than Lowe's. The Minnesota front office did not seem saddened by his departure to Colorado. Like Lowe, Slowey was in 2011 much the same pitcher he has shown himself to be throughout his career. Also like Lowe, Slowey did not benefit from an elevated BABIP (.330) and terrible bullpen support (58.3 LOB%). Even factoring these in, though, Slowey was not a good pitcher in 2011.
Slowey has elite-level control, in the sense that he very rarely walks batters. Last year his rate dipped to a near absent 1.9%, meaning that even with his dip in strikeouts last season, his BB/K ratio jumped to nearly 7. But with Slowey it is important to distinguish his pitching control from pitch location. Slowey throws strikes, but too often he fails to deceive hitters with his pitch location and quality. The result is that hitters often make very solid contact against Slowey, with a career OPS against near .800 and an average over the past three seasons over .800. Given how rarely he gives up walks, this suggests hitters often tee off on Slowey's stuff...which they do (his career SLG% against in near .500, with an ISO near .200). When Slowey is at his best (i.e. 2008), he is able to mix enough deception into his repertoire to induce a decent amount of swinging strikes in with his called strikes, while minimizing his BIP damage.
Slowey's stuff, a high 80s fastball (65% usage) paired with a slider/curve/changeup suite of secondary pitches, lacks a high ceiling. But where Slowey can improve his game, and probably what the Indians have liked in Slowey's potential, is the possibility of increasing his pitching success by transforming his control into above average pitchability. By that I mean better changing up pitch sequences and location to increase his deception, keep hitters off-balance, and decrease hitters success on balls in play. The Paul Byrd style pitchers of the world that find success with marginal stuff are rare, but Slowey's track record of control is pretty rare as well.
| Kevin Slowey | W-L | ERA | BB% | K% | GB% | OPS | IP |
| 2011 | 0-8 | 6.67 | 1.9 | 13.2 | 31.1 | .868 | 59.1 |
| (2009-2011) | 8-6 | 5.01 | 3.7 | 17.1 | 30.9 | .811 | 102.0 |
| Career | 39-29 | 4.66 | 3.7 | 17.5 | 31.6 | .792 | 532.2 |
46 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Someone’s got to pitch until Barnes, Sisco, De La Cruz, Carrasco and Howard are ready.
Most arguments are really about context.
by SheaWasBettor21 on Feb 3, 2012 11:19 AM EST reply actions
You have to get off this De La Cruz kick. He is the pitching equivalent of Nick Weglarz at this point. In other words, far closer to a “could have been, but never was” kind of player than a “still might be” guy.
I have a feeling Weglarz is the next to vanish from the 40.
Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.
Yeah, Weglarz is another guy who has shown to not be very good. No reason to worry about him at all.
While some might argue it’s the same thing, isn’t Weglarz more of a guy who has shown he can’t stay healthy?
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
Yes. He wasn’t great last year, but that was probably injury-related. Outside of last year and his first year at age 17, he has never OPSed below .800 at any level.
Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.
And while that is true, his power potential never truly manifested itself either. His ops lines were always more a result of his superlative ability to generate walks.
Last year was probably the most extreme example of all his tendencies – managed only 170 at bats at Akron, batting .179 with 3 home runs, but still had a .360 obp
Odradek is still checking in; I hope he gives us some of his thoughts on this interesting off-season. In Socratic dialog or not.
I simultaneously miss him and dread his return. I hope he’s still around.
by Jay on Feb 6, 2012 2:55 PM EST up reply actions
He’s 23, and coming off a 3.54 FIP season with a near 10 (TEN!) K/9. 6-5, 200 lbs, mid 90s gas. I think “could have been but never was” is pretty harsh.
He burst on the scene very young, so he might seem older. If he had went to college in the states, he’d be barely 2 years removed from the draft.
Most arguments are really about context.
by SheaWasBettor21 on Feb 3, 2012 11:37 AM EST up reply actions
While walking 6 guys per 9 innings, getting switched to a bullpen role and only throwing 86 innings…
I’m not saying there isn’t the possibility of a high-ceiling there somewhere, he just seems an unlikely candidate to reach it.
Started 16 games. They’re babying him a bit because of past injury problems. I typically grant lefties and tall power pitchers more leeway in age, meaning I expect them to mature later.
De La Cruz is hit with 2 major causes for stunted development. I agree on the higher risk, but if the Indians coaches are worth anything, he should at least become a lights out reliever. As you noted, immense upside.
Most arguments are really about context.
by SheaWasBettor21 on Feb 3, 2012 11:58 AM EST up reply actions
He didn’t go to college in the states, though, which means that clock that ticks towards minor-league free agency is a lot farther along on him. As APV notes, that doesn’t mean that he doesn’t have a lot of potential, but it is another factor that limits the odds that he ever reaches it with the Tribe.
How does minor league free agency work? How many years? Does it change with a “cup of coffee”?
Most arguments are really about context.
by SheaWasBettor21 on Feb 3, 2012 12:15 PM EST up reply actions
Similar to major league free agency, it’s six full seasons after the signing, so more like 6.5 as a rule.
Of course you can’t become a minor league free agent if you are added to the 40-man, at which point you have a major league contract.
That’s not quite right, is it? One has a major league contract only when added to the 25 man roster. Addition to the 40 man roster starts the options clock, but does not result in the awarding of a major league contract.
No, a major league contract is synonymous with being on the 40-man. Think about draft picks being signed to major league contracts; they still go to the minors.
Optional assignment means that you are assigned to a minor league club while on a major league contract. That is the exact meaning of that term.
by Jay on Feb 3, 2012 1:02 PM EST up reply actions
Got it; I think that I was getting tripped up by thinking of a major league contract as synonymous with receiving the major league minimum paycheck.
Right, players generally have a “split contract” during option years.
by Jay on Feb 3, 2012 1:40 PM EST up reply actions
Maybe APV is right. Maybe I do need to get off the De La Cruz kick.
Hopefully they know of a way to game the system.
Most arguments are really about context.
by SheaWasBettor21 on Feb 3, 2012 12:36 PM EST up reply actions
CBS reporting Laporta is to start in AAA. I’d welcome this actually.
Most arguments are really about context.
by SheaWasBettor21 on Feb 3, 2012 11:49 AM EST reply actions
I’d like to believe he’s taking a Gordon-esque path to stardom.
Most arguments are really about context.
by SheaWasBettor21 on Feb 3, 2012 12:18 PM EST up reply actions
I got excited for a moment, then I remembered Gordon always figured out how to get on base, even when he couldn’t hit the ball.
Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.
What’s annoying is he will be Pujols-ian in AAA for like 80 ABs, as if he’s fattening me up for the kill.
Most arguments are really about context.
by SheaWasBettor21 on Feb 3, 2012 12:24 PM EST up reply actions
Also, in Triple-A, the proper term is Kouzmanoffesque.
by Jay on Feb 3, 2012 12:26 PM EST up reply actions 5 recs
I always forget we had him. Should have retired after his first ML AB.
I like ex-Phillies prospects.
by Gradyforpresident on Feb 3, 2012 2:30 PM EST up reply actions
right, should have specified.
that’s just hilarious
I like ex-Phillies prospects.
by Gradyforpresident on Feb 4, 2012 2:39 PM EST up reply actions
Lowe/Slowey Comparables
Using the 2010 and 2011 season stats and looking at the pitcher skill stats of K/9, BB/9 and GB/FB here are Derek Lowe and Kevin Slowey’s closest comparables based off of this data only.
(K/9, BB/9, GB/FB)
Derek Lowe (6.45, 3.10, 2.61)
1. Justin Masterson (6.72, 3.21, 2.25)
2. Tim Hudson (6.02, 2.64, 2.57)
3. Charlie Morton (6.05, 3.69, 2.43)
4. Trevor Cahill (5.90, 3.23, 2.07)
5. Tim Stauffer (6.04, 2.56, 1.89)
6. Jaime Garcia (7.24, 2.87, 2.03)
7. Carlos Carrasco (6.54, 2.87, 1.56)
8. Jake Westbrook (5.41, 3.29, 2.35)
9. Brett Anderson (6.26, 2.16, 2.09)
10. Ricky Romero (7.28, 3.35, 1.9)
Kevin Slowey (6.48, 1.51, 0.56)
1. Josh Collmenter (5.83, 1.63, 0.71)
2. Jordan Zimmermann (7.07, 1.92, 0.99)
3. Alexi Ogando (6.68, 2.32, 0.92)
4. Brandon McCarthy (6.49, 1.32, 1.45)
5. Philip Humber (6.59, 2.16, 1.31)
6. Johan Santana (6.51, 2.49, 0.76)
7. Joe Blanton (6.97, 2.15, 1.22)
8. Daniel Hudson (7.18, 2.18, 0.98)
9. Ricky Nolasco (7.30, 1.91, 1.22)
10. Bartolo Colon (7.18, 2.18, 1.24)
First off, the big thing that sticks out is how these two pitchers are complete opposites in terms of groundball/fly ball tendancies. Lowe is an extreme groundball pitcher, who cares more about his infield defense than how close/far the fences are away. Slowey on the other hand is an extreme fly ball pitcher who benefits from large ballparks and speedy outfielders. Both pitchers strikeout the same amount of hitters, while Slowey does so with much better control than Lowe. Slowey needs the control as walks and fly ball pitchers usually don’t mesh too well. Lowe on the other hand can get by with a few more walks if he can get them erased with ground ball double plays.
by Xeifrank on Feb 3, 2012 12:22 PM EST reply actions 4 recs
“Slowey on the other hand is an extreme fly ball pitcher who benefits from large ballparks and speedy outfielders.”
This saying always gets me. As if there is a pitcher type that doesn’t benefit from big ball parks and speedy OFs.
Most arguments are really about context.
by SheaWasBettor21 on Feb 3, 2012 12:26 PM EST reply actions
I’m really hoping one/both of these guys works out, but I’d really like to see the front office get the likes of Rich Harden on the phone, who I believe is still out of work.
Fear the Fedora.
by MooneysRebellion on Feb 3, 2012 1:05 PM EST reply actions
I think the FO is too anti-walk for that to happen.
by JulioBernazard on Feb 3, 2012 1:11 PM EST up reply actions
Slow(ey) and Low(e), sung to the tune of the Beasties’ “Slow and Low”
Let it flow
Let yourself go
Slow(ey) and Low(e)
That is the tempo
It’s never old school – all brand new
So everybody catch – the soft tossing flu
Not like a fever – not like a cold
The strikes are clear – the ground balls are bold
So don’t see a umpire or see a nurse
Just listen to Antonetti – first things first
First of all – get away from the wall
These guys throw a heavy ball
Because we slowed it on down – so fans get the hell up
Like a volcano we’ll erupt
We got craftiness – grit and signs
Prog Field fries only come in one size
What you see is what you get
And you ain’t seen nothing yet
Let it flow
Let yourself go
Slow(ey) and Low(e)
That is the tempo
by JulioBernazard on Feb 3, 2012 1:11 PM EST reply actions 5 recs
Awesome. Laughing so hard at soft tossing flu.
Never trust a man who doesn't drink.
by Noir Jim Tressel on Feb 4, 2012 12:39 AM EST up reply actions
Rec for caption alone.
Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 3, 2012 7:36 PM EST reply actions

by 














