SAT Analogy—Shelley Duncan:Casey Kotchman
With the signing of Casey Kotchman, Cleveland has finally made a move to patch over the black hole that was 1B in 2011. The Indians cumulative OPS at 1B last season was 763, about 30 points below league average. It appears the Indians have already decided to send Matt LaPorta back to Columbus, barring injuries anyway, and there's no reason to complain about that. However, it's at least worth diagnosing exactly how the Indians have upgraded the Cold Corner. I'm going to chart out the 2011 1B, plus Kotchman, both by their 2011 numbers and career numbers. Santana's numbers will be 1B-only, while I'll use total numbers of LaPorta (who was horrible as a DH/PH last season) and Duncan. For reference, the total AL split at first for 2011 was a .340/452 OBP/SLG with a 116 OPS+ and a 2.09 SO:BB.
2011:
| Name | PA | OBP | SLG | OPS+ | XBH | SO:BB |
| Casey Kotchman | 563 | .378 | .422 | 128 | 36 | 1.38 |
| Matt LaPorta | 385 | .299 | .412 | 97 | 35 | 3.78 |
| Carlos Santana | 272 | .338 | .451 | 115 | 30 | 1.88 |
| Shelley Duncan | 247 | .324 | .484 | 123 | 28 | 2.94 |
Career:
| Name |
PA |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS+ |
XBH |
SO:BB |
| Casey Kotchman |
2891 |
.336 |
.398 |
98 |
211 |
1.20 |
| Matt LaPorta |
1008 |
.304 |
.397 |
93 |
83 |
2.54 |
| Carlos Santana |
272 |
.338 |
.451 |
115 |
30 |
1.88 |
| Shelley Duncan |
669 |
.313 |
.441 |
105 |
61 |
2.83 |
Let's run through each player's profile.
Kotchman's 2011 was his career year. Casey started in pro baseball with the Angels and was an uber-prospect by the 2005 BA list, when he was rated as #6 in all of baseball. He has struggled with injuries throughout his career but just as detrimental to fulfilling his promise has been a lack of power development. Kotchman's good looking swing and doubles power as a youngster never translated to homeruns and now he's a first basemen trying to get by on plate discipline and singles. He has a significant platoon split, preferring to bat against righties (754 vs 668). This split was present in 2011, albeit with both numbers much higher (838 vs 709)2011 was a best-case-scenario for Kotchman, with good health, continued adequate plate control, and more hits on balls in play (much has been made of his .335 BABIP last season). It's unclear what led to the improvement in his game (if anything), but he did have vision correction prior to the season. Finally, Kotchman is considered to be an elite defensive first basemen and is clearly regarded as the best defender on this list.
Matt LaPorta is also a former top prospect but one cut from a very different cloth than Kotchman. In each of his minor league seasons, Kotchman never struck out more than he walked. The exact opposite is true of LaPorta. LaPorta's career minor league slugging percentage is .566 and he's gone yard once every 16 at-bats; Kotchman's corresponding numbers are .491 and a homerun every 42 at-bats. LaPorta is a much more prototypical first base prospect—he has genuine power and sells out often to take advantage of it. Unfortunately, LaPorta's prototypical profile brings with it prototypical problems: as LaPorta hit the majors he lost all ability to control the plate, likely a result of his extensive struggles with nearly all off-speed pitches, and his OBP tanked as his K's rose. LaPorta can still make the ball go 'BOOM', he just doesn't make enough contact for it to matter. LaPorta's platoon split is similar to Kotchman's, which is odd since LaPorta bats righty. For his career, he is at 725 vs RHP and 629 vs LHP.
Carlos Santana doesn't need much of an introduction. One of the top young hitters in the game, the Indians have decided to continue to play Santana behind the plate for the foreseeable future. He pounds lefties, for an 882 OPS, and hits more than passably against lefties, for a 795 OPS. Whoever sees the most time at 1B will be sitting relatively often in favor of Santana on his off days.
We come to Shelley Duncan. Duncan is a long-time organizational soldier type, as evidenced by the 355 AAA games he's already logged in his career. The Indians signed Duncan as a depth option at LF/1B/DH prior to the 2010 season and, finally free of the Yankees and their surfeit of bats, Shelley stumbled into 506 major league PAs over the last two seasons. That more than tripled what he'd received through the end of 2009. Finally given the chance to play a bit, Duncan did better than one might've predicted. In his age 30 and 31 seasons, he took those 506 PAs and posted a 771 OPS. His numbers aren't shockingly good, but they do approach the average 1B line I posted way back before the jump, and they're leaps and bounds better than the 702 OPS posted by the average AL LF.
Duncan is a big, oafish-looking, bat-only right-hander, and that sort of player tends to have a platoon split (hey, Matt LaPorta!) but Duncan's brief major league career indicates that, no, he can hit righties and lefties with equal adequacy. Ah, you say, but he's a career minor leaguer—those major league splits are likely inaccurate. I would've said the same thing, my friend, but the current incarnation of minor league splits indicates that Duncan has never struggled with a platoon split. That does not mean Duncan lacks significant flaws: most notably, he swings and misses a great deal. That's particularly alarming because of his age.
If you're thinking like I'm thinking, then you're going a little cockeyed. Already on the roster, the Indians are carrying a player who certainly appears capable of at least a 750 OPS against pitchers of the right and left-handed variety. Nothing in Duncan's pedigree says he couldn't do that consistently: it's where his MLEs have generally lived and below his 50th percentile PECOTA projection last season. In fact, entering last season, Duncan's 50th percentile PECOTA projection was better than Kotchman's 70th percentile PECOTA projection. The Indians just signed Kotchman to a $3M/year contract; Duncan will make approximately $500,000 this season.
So, what gives? We can produce a few rationales.
- Duncan, a RHB, is viewed as a good platoon partner for three positions: 1B, DH, and LF (all set to be manned by LHB in 2012). That makes some sense on the surface except Duncan's career OPS against RHP is either better than or essentially the same as Brantley's and Kotchman's. Sure, Duncan can protect those guys, and Hafner, from lefties, but he can stick up for himself against the righties.
- Duncan is viewed as bad enough defensively at 1B that he can't be considered as a regular there. Entirely possible—I can't speak to this. Duncan came up through the minors playing predominantly first but circumstances have led to him playing mostly outfield in the majors. Kotchman is, as previously stated, considered excellent at first. It wasn't long ago that the Indians infield defense became something of a laughingstock and it appears that the renewed emphasis on that area of the game will carry over into 2012.
- The Indians have other plans for Duncan. I suspect this is the case, although I can't put my finger on exactly what those plans are. It's possible that the Indians think Duncan will be playing LF regularly as Brantley shifts to CF in a scenario where Sizemore is either DH'ing or sitting quite a bit. It's also possible that the Indians are going to get Duncan 500 ABs between LF, 1B, and RF. It's also possible that Brantley's hold on LF might be a lot less firm than some think.
- The Indians believe Duncan, an older player with a lot of mileage, is about to crater. Entirely possible.
- From the P-D: "He controls the strike zone and puts up a quality at-bat," said Antonetti. "He doesn't strikeout much and puts the ball in play. He does a good job managing his at-bats."
Obviously, this has gotten away from me a bit. However, I can't shake the feeling that the Indians have found real value with Shelley Duncan and it's a shame to not take advantage of it somehow. I don't mind the Kotchman signing but this was not a case, as it has been portrayed most of the offseason, of a club with no first basemen or right-handed bat available. When I really sat down and looked at this, I'm surprised there wasn't more of a push to simply hand Duncan the job and see how it goes. I certainly hope Duncan's on the roster on opening day, and I wouldn't predict he'll be cut. The Indians are generally pretty smart and the smart thing to do would be to find Duncan at-bats. If I were Michael Brantley, I'd be wondering where, and if, I'd be playing most of the season.
121 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Than. Boom.
Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.
by USSChoo on Feb 3, 2012 3:02 PM EST up reply actions 10 recs
Why would you be hoping for more? Less Duncan ABs means that Kotchman, Brantley, Sizemore, Hafner, and Choo are all healthy and hitting. If that’s true (unlikely I know) then the Indians are probably having a great year.
So I’m hoping for far fewer than 450 ABs for Duncan.
Yes. But the only way Duncan gets a chance to perform well is if one of the other is hurt or sucking.
Or he hits 3 HRs in a game and they decide to ride it for a week and then it never goes away. There a thousand different ways this can play out and Duncan being on the field isn’t always a negative outcome, no matter how badly you want it to be.
Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.
by USSChoo on Feb 3, 2012 4:25 PM EST up reply actions 5 recs
Yes there could be a thousand different ways that Duncan gets more playing time. My point is that if all of those guys are playing well, he’s probably not going to see the field a lot. Unless you think Duncan is a better player than the guys I listed, then yes it is probably a bad thing that Duncan would get playing time over them.
But for some reason this comment was recced.
Yes, I think there is a chance that Duncan is better this year than Kotchman or Brantley. And I like Brantley. This isn’t a stretch and isn’t a knock on either of them. But a guy who can put together stretches like he did in the 2nd half of last year always has the chance for it to click for a whole year.
Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.
It is OK to agree with me every now and again. Duncan getting 450 ABs on this team means something went wrong with Brantley, Sizemore, Choo, Hafner, or Kotchman.
This is probably expected, but I don’t think it’s worth hoping happens.
Duncan getting 450 ABs on this team means something went wrong with Brantley, Sizemore, Choo, Hafner, or Kotchman.
Not necessarily.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
Perhaps more to the point, it is likely that something will go wrong with one (or more) of those five players, four of whom missed significant playing time in 2011 alone.
I don’t even see it as unfortunate.
You take any club’s OF, DH and 1B, over 450 PA are going to go to one or more other players. If you have a good option for a “sixth man,” then most of them will go to that guy.
by Jay on Feb 6, 2012 2:53 PM EST up reply actions
On the other hand, if Duncan is in the field, there’s a high likelihood of some kind of negative outcome.
Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 3, 2012 5:30 PM EST up reply actions
1 word explains Kotchman’s “breakout”. Astroturf. Whatever. He’s a lottery ticket that offers another lottery ticket time to work on things in AAA.
Most arguments are really about context.
by SheaWasBettor21 on Feb 3, 2012 3:37 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
LD% at home, 15.2. Road LD%, 21.2.
.333 BABIP at home with a 15.2 LD%.
Most arguments are really about context.
by SheaWasBettor21 on Feb 4, 2012 12:16 AM EST up reply actions
Why not take GB% — 56.6% at home, 55% on the road.
We can argue about the minutiae, but its not like everyone that switches to turf puts up the 10th best OBP in the league.
Precisely. Same GB%, lower LD%, yet same BABIP. He sucks dude. Get over it.
Most arguments are really about context.
by SheaWasBettor21 on Feb 4, 2012 1:05 PM EST up reply actions
I just think your statement that turf is the only reason he had his best year since 2007, especially after having eye surgery, is a bit (pun intended) myopic
It’s the primary cause. Based on a quick check of his peripherals, I don’t see any evidence his eye surgery changed anything.
Most arguments are really about context.
by SheaWasBettor21 on Feb 4, 2012 7:40 PM EST up reply actions
It’s worth noting that LaPorta was never a Top 10 prospect or anything close to it.
I think Kotchman makes a much better lottery ticket. Hell, I could make the case they should have given him a three-year deal. What would it have taken, seven million? Eight?
by Jay on Feb 4, 2012 2:58 PM EST up reply actions
I’d buy that more if he was a righty. Dont you think our line up is a strong consideration here, or should be?
by MTF on Feb 4, 2012 4:35 PM EST up reply actions
But, Jay, then he’d block our 250-pound, 22-year-old, high A prospect. Think!
Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 4, 2012 5:55 PM EST up reply actions
I’ve been going back and forth on if we should have tried to tie him up longer. I’m sure he was only looking for a one year deal to prove his worth for the next FA market, but we have nobody better to play 1st anytime soon.
by 7foot3 on Feb 5, 2012 12:53 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I don’t think he’s in a position to turn down an extra $5 million guaranteed at this moment in his life.
I don’t think so either, but if he’s certain he can put up another 128 OPS+, and he’s still on the right side of 30, he’s got to be expecting a big payday.
by 7foot3 on Feb 6, 2012 9:46 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
To be clear, I completely agree with you, but I’m not putting that past ballplayers. I feel its a pretty natural reaction to think, after you have a great performance, that you can continue building on it. He got his eyes fixed up, maybe he tried something different at the plate, etc. I can understand that he thinks 2011 is his new baseline.
by 7foot3 on Feb 8, 2012 1:05 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I doubt it. He’s already had the big ups and downs, and he knows he didn’t get a lot of multi-year offers this offseason. I think he’d see $8 million as a great payday, correctly.
by Jay on Feb 8, 2012 2:02 AM EST up reply actions
Kotchman has an Orlando Cabrera-like stink to him. We’re all going to hate him in August. I can already tell.
by Chemo on Feb 3, 2012 5:22 PM EST reply actions 4 recs
The fact that you’re ready to sign on to knowing you’re not going to hate Kotchman by August says a lot about your irrational attachment to him. Nothing could make you hate him? Not if he hit .080/.100/.120 in 250 AB? Not if Hafner was tearing the cover off the ball and Kotchman hurt him with an over-zealous high five? Not if he bought the franchise and moved it to Duluth? There’s no chance you hate him in August?
One guy says he’s going to hate Kotchman in August. The other says he won’t, and you decide to pick on the latter for being irrational? Surely they share the same irrationality?
by Aussie Wahoo on Feb 9, 2012 6:11 AM EST via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
This isn’t the American judicial system. Mid-level free agents are hated until proven likable.
Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.
by USSChoo on Feb 9, 2012 9:19 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
August? He freakin’ had me at hello
by stuart dean on Feb 3, 2012 8:47 PM EST up reply actions 5 recs
I think this sells him a little short. I feel like his floor is a little bit higher than that.
by Joel D on Feb 4, 2012 9:03 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Too long to read with a beer in hand. But didn’t vision correction surgery turn around Jhonny’s career? You’ve just made me feel a little better about Casey joining the team. Or maybe it’s the Schlitz (Classic 60s Formula)…
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge..." C. Darwin
by Spidey on Feb 3, 2012 7:30 PM EST via mobile reply actions 1 recs
I think it took Peralta a couple of seasons before the upturn, so it’s debatable what the attribution ought to be.
by afh4 on Feb 3, 2012 8:14 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I don’t think the surgery’s are the same though. Kotchman was on the radio here in Cleveland yesterday and was describing his issue. He stated that he had a gland. Here’s an article on it from Tampa.
also from that article:
“It was kind of like looking through a dirty windshield wiper,” he said.
After batting .217 in 125 games for the Mariners, the second-worst average of his career, the former Seminole High star made an appointment in October with Dr. Tom Tooma, a pioneer in lasik who had performed the surgery on Kotchman in Newport Beach, Calif., in 2004.
Kotchman, 28, was diagnosed with a bacterial infection, and Tooma squeezed pus out of both tear ducts. Several followup visits ensured the problem was corrected.
by hans on Feb 4, 2012 9:41 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
oops meant to write that “he had a gland issue near his eye”
by hans on Feb 4, 2012 9:42 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Thought you’d gone all Al Michaels on us.
Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 4, 2012 2:30 PM EST up reply actions
There might be some cause for hope here, but the bottom line is that his baseline BABIP probably isn’t over .330 or whatever, and he wasn’t even awesome last year when it was. He was just pretty good.
“Pretty good” would be a nice improvement over Matola.
"Lotta heart in Cleveland." - Ian Hunter
by Denver Tribe Fan on Feb 4, 2012 10:54 AM EST up reply actions
I’m certainly not saying that this is the move of the off season, just that I don’t hate this signing the way some people seem to.
"Lotta heart in Cleveland." - Ian Hunter
by Denver Tribe Fan on Feb 4, 2012 11:40 AM EST up reply actions
There is no reason at all to hate this signing. It’s a 1 year deal for a low amount of money. It’s no risk.
Right. There’s no reason to be that passionate about this signing either way. If there’s any feeling about it, it should be vaguely positive. Like you said, where’s the downside?
I disagree that there’s no downside to this move. I think it’s entirely possible that it was a mistake to guarantee a 25 man spot to a glorified NRI level guy.
Given the club’s apparent commitment to Marson, Donald and Cunningham being on the OD roster, this means Chisenhall is likely starting the year in AAA and we are taking the risk that his development is hindered by our small collection of trash at the corners. Of course Chisenhall could absolutely rake this ST, meaning we likely either lose Duncan (a better player than Kotchman) or Cunningham (thereby running Kotchman’s 2011 BABIP’s cost to Cunningham, Burns, Judy and $3 mil) since both are out of options.
If we really have too many effective corner players at the end of spring training, we can trade one.
by Jay on Feb 6, 2012 9:11 PM EST up reply actions
We won’t, hence my “small collection of trash” reference. But my worry is that we will play the asset management game that we have in the past and send the only guy down that still has options, when in reality, giving him the full time job is both our best chance to win this year, and in the future.
Sounds like you’re worried that we’ll send down LaPorta. From what I can tell, you’d be the only one.
Taking 50 games to realize that Hannahan is still the same old .675 Career OPS guy while Chisenhall is in Columbus is the object of my concern here.
Before the Kotchman signing, I figured we’d have both on the OD roster.
Obviously, they know his numbers.
My concern is that Chisenhall has become collateral damage of our crappy efforts to add marginal value at 1B/LF.
Upon review of his age and past minor league experience, another half season at AAA might not be so bad for him anyways, but the decision should be made based on what is best for him, not because of all the other assorted garbage we are trying to squeeze onto the roster.
The decision should be made on what’s best for the MLB team, not what’s best for Chisenhall.
Please note: I’m hoping Chisenhall is the starting 3B this year. And if the only risk is that Duncan doesn’t get ABs, it’s no risk.
Doing what’s best for Chisenhall is what’s best for the team. He is easily the most valuable asset that is involved in this roster discussion, and it’s not close. Risking his long-term progression to hopefully squeeze an extra 0.5 WAR out of Kotchman’s glove or whatever, would be stupid.
Also, Duncan has value. Like it or not, he is one of the best hitters we have, on a team starved for them.
I basically agree that what is best for Chisenhall very likely aligns with what is best for the team.
by Jay on Feb 8, 2012 2:03 AM EST up reply actions
Kotchman reminds me of Lyle Overbay.
by kennesawmountainwahoo on Feb 4, 2012 12:33 PM EST up reply actions
I’d have taken Overbay at 29.
Though I look right at home, I still feel like an exile
by Manhattan Tribe Fan on Feb 4, 2012 2:31 PM EST up reply actions
The other thing I’m not clear on is the onset of the infection. I’m doubtful it was a problem that effected him for more than a season or two without him seeking treatment earlier. The implication of this is, we should still probably consider his body of work when trying to project him going forward, with maybe some consideration for lower numbers in the season before the surgery was completed.
Interestingly enough, his swinging, BB, and K rates hardly changed at all from 2010 to 2011. The only thing we can see that changed was his luck on BIP.
I hate this move so much. I don’t even care if it’s irrational hate. I don’t want Casey Kotchman. I don’t want Matt LaPorta. I don’t want Shelly Duncan. I hate everything. How can a team have such bad options at first base?
I will say that I’m still pretty optimistic about this season, but I’m also an idiot.
Case of the beet bandit. Missing beets from all over the farm, no footprints. Inside job. Mose in socks. Boom. Case closed. -Dwight Schrute
by mjschaefer on Feb 4, 2012 8:59 AM EST reply actions 2 recs
Just think of how enjoyable it was watching Mannahan play third last year, and consider that we’ll have a superb defensive first baseman, a guy who has fewer errors in his entire career than LaPorta/Santana/Duncan did just last year at 1B. He’ll improve the entire infield’s defense.
Come to think of hated things, I sure hated watching Santana at 1B last year. And Duncan.
Absolutely. Love good defense, though I didn’t hate Santana at first the way you did. The difficulty of playing first is often overlooked, and having a superior defender there will be great.
by MTF on Feb 4, 2012 4:31 PM EST up reply actions
Santana’s a good athlete, but no 1B. I don’t think he’s tall enough ever to be really good there, and there were LOTS of examples last year where his foot was off or on top of the bag, where he couldn’t handle throws in the dirt, didn’t know when to go for a ball, etc., or simply wasn’t focused on what was going on in real time.
All because his bat is so valuable on this team that we can’t play him as much as we’d like at his real position, catcher. So we end up compromising another position to compensate. Hated it.
Much rather have a Marson caliber catcher with hohum offensive skills to bear the brunt of the position (another year and Marson himself may be that guy), and have a Santana bat in a real good first baseman’s package, who plays there every day.
Not me. I’d much rather have two guys who can hit in the lineup. Hopefully Kotchman gies us this.
Marson is a terrible hitter.
You have to look at his splits for one season to get sOPS+, which tells you his OPS+ for that specific split.
In 2011, 39 vs RHP as RHB, 113 vs LHP as RHB.
That is really, incredibly bad vs RHP.
However, it’s also quite good vs. LHP, considering the 113 number is comparing him to ALL righty bats, not just catchers.
I’m not sure what you mean here. He’s likely going to be spending the bulk of his age 27 year at AAA. He’s going to have to obliterate the competition AND show either (or both) qualitatively or quantitatively that he can hit breaking-ball pitches to perhaps put himself on in the discussion for the 1B job in 2013.
Don’t know where else to ask this, so I’m putting it here:
Can someone explain how David Ortiz is arbitration eligible? I cannot figure this one out.
Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.
The Red Sox tendered David Ortiz a contract, through arbitration, earlier in the off-season. Ortiz accepted, taking him out of this off-season’s free agent class. The arbitration offer extended the window of time the Red Sox and Ortiz could come to agree on the terms of a contract (they had already agreed to have a contract, just not its terms). They have been unable to agree to terms as of yet, meaning an arbitration hearing has been set, which if it happens, will determine his salary for 2012. Had Ortiz not accepted the Red Sox arbitration offer and he signed elsewhere as a free agent, they would have received draft compensation in return.
OK, so this is a separate form of arbitration than the typical 3 year, service time related arbitration situations. Thank you.
Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.
It’s uncommon but not entirely rare.
As a rule, going with an arbitrated salary is bad for the club in terms of the single-year cost and bad for the player in terms of only getting one guaranteed year rather than a larger guarantee based on a multi-year salary. A club often won’t offer arbitration if the player was unlikely to command an average annual salary in free agency that was more than half of what he got in his walk year.
As often as not, you see the club get surprised when the player accepts arbitration. You can read a pretty well researched piece here (MLBTR did something right!) about one of the more famous cases.
by Jay on Feb 6, 2012 2:43 PM EST up reply actions
No matter how many plate appearances Duncan has, I’m more comfortable with him taking swings than LaPorta. He came up with a lot of clutch hits last year, he’s another righty on the roster, and he gives us depth at three positions where our current players tend to be injury prone. Glad to have him on the roster.
Let's Go Cavs!
by Clevsports on Feb 10, 2012 8:46 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
You need to know something about Duncan,
Duncan had absolutely Jekyll and Hyde numbers in 2011 before the All Star Break versus after the All Star Break. After the All Star Break numbers reveal an OPS for batters with at least 125 at bats twelfth best in the A.L., (or it might have been in all of baseball?)
Numbers before the All Star break are really bad.
Do we go with the second half as showing an improvement? Duncan did change his approach at the plate, learning to jab his bat out at any two strike pitch that was on the corner and that might be called a third strike.
I recall one at bat where Duncan was down 0-2 in the count, runners on, two outs, and Duncan fouled off close pitches and worked the count, then hit the ball for either a double or home run and the Indians won the game.
The pre-all star Duncan would have struck out on three pitches.
by ItsAlex on Feb 11, 2012 1:55 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
We know. Most of us also agree that his 2nd half numbers are largely inflated by a good 2 or so week stretch.
Matt LaPorta is the bane of my existence.
by USSChoo on Feb 11, 2012 2:48 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
My guess is that an Ortiz breakdown in Boston and the nothingness of Yankee LH bats at DH will create a market for Hafner, and Duncan will settle into a three-year run as a full-time DH with 260/340/500/840 numbers.
by YoDaddyWags on Feb 11, 2012 8:57 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Even at his advanced age, Shelley still seems to be on an upward arc, with an OPS around 775 in A ball, 814 in AA, 880 in AAA, 700 with the Yankees and 770 in Cleveland, with no terrible platoon splits, as Andrew noted.
Not that I’d seriously advise you against taking the under.
by YoDaddyWags on Feb 11, 2012 11:45 AM EST up reply actions

by 

















