Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Recap
Box Score
Win Probability Added @ Fangraphs
Update: Courtesy of SporTech Matter, some pictures from the game.
Highest WPA:
David Dellucci .287
Trot Nixon .092
Tom Mastny .090
Lowest WPA:
Cliff Lee (as pitcher) -.124
Travis Hafner -.059
Cliff Lee (as hitter) -.044
This was an ugly game. Real ugly. The Indians took advantage of horrendously bad defense by Florida and a laughably bad judgment call by the home plate umpire to score six runs in the sixth inning.
Here's a play-by-play, but you had to watch the game to get the full traveshamockery of it all:
Top 6th (Kim pitching)
V. Martinez struck out swinging
At this point, I was aimlessly switching channels between pitches. The Indians hadn't scored a run since Monday in Cleveland, and the offense was making Kim look dominant. The Martinez strikeout was Kim's eighth of the night. His previous high was five.
Travis Hafner singled to right
Jeff Albert's guest post earlier this week brought up a great point; Hafner simply isn't hitting the ball in the air. This graph shows a marked change in the distribution of balls in play. Just about half of the balls he hits are on the ground.
J. Peralta doubled to deep right, T. Hafner to third
Jhonny's quietly regained his 2005 form. The key to him getting pitches to hit? He's back to around league average in BB/K ratio. Is it the surgery, or just an adjustment? Whatever the case, he's back as an offensive force.
T. Nixon safe at first on D. Uggla's throwing error, T. Hafner and J. Peralta scored, T. Nixon to second
This is where things got bizarre. I thought Nixon should have been credited for a hit, because Uggla made a pretty good play just to get to the ball, but his throw is what allowed two runs to score. You know, now that I think about it, even the scorer had an off night.
M. Rouse safe at first on J. Hermida's fielding error, T. Nixon to third, M. Rouse to second
This one goes into the dumb error category. Hermida had to run in to catch Rouse's bloop, but there's simply no excuse for a major-leaguer to drop a ball that catchable. Rouse, who's doing the little things because that's all that's keeping him in the majors, hustled to second on the play.
R. Garko hit for C. Lee
R. Garko grounded out to second, T. Nixon scored, M. Rouse to third
Liked the move, because Lee had thrown 91 pitches, was actually fortunate to have lasted this far, and the back end of the bullpen was pretty rested. With one out, all Garko need to do was to put the ball on the ground to tie the game, as the Marlins had the infield back. He did it, and the Indians knotted the score at three.
T. Tankersley relieved B. Kim
With two outs, the Marlins brought in their LOOGY to face Sizemore. Smart move, as Sizemore has a rather large platoon split, and left-handers have been feasting on Kim.
G. Sizemore hit by pitch (Tankersley ejected)
Previously, home plate umpire Brian Knight warned both benches after Lee hit Miguel Cabrera. But this ejection was totally uncalled for. Sizemore was down in the count 0-2, and though the pitch hit Sizemore in the shoulder, there was little evidence that the beaning was intentional. Marlins manager Fredi Gonzalez was automatically ejected, and 1B Aaron Boone was tossed after (understandably) sticking up for his pitcher.
J. Wood at first
L. Gardner relieved T. Tankersley
My first response when Gardner entered the game was "who?" Gardner made his MLB debut in 2002 with Tampa, pitching 13.1 nondescript innings. He got another shot with Tampa in 2005, but lasted only 7.1 innings. He's pitched 27.2 innings with the Marlins this year, and left-handers were hitting .338/.403/.431 against him. David Dellucci has been struggling, but why tempt fate?
D. Dellucci homered to deep right, M. Rouse and G. Sizemore scored
And there's the game. Mike Rouse made a tremendous play in throwing out Matt Treanor in a play at the plate, Travis Hafner got a flyball infield single, leading to another run, but the sixth inning was where all the action was.
Cliff actually got the win. He's 3-4, which means he's one win away from being an average pitcher again.
Next Up: Jason Stanford's back! Stanford vs. Willis, 7:05 PM
51 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
by Turkmenbashi on Jun 14, 2007 12:18 AM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Interesting that Wedge intimated in the linked article that Stanford will stay in the Tribe bullpen when Westbrook returns, giving them 3 LHP.
Do I smell a DFA for Hernandez?
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Cleveland Indians
Purchased the contract of LHP Jason Stanford from the Triple-A Buffalo and optioned RHP Matt Miller to Buffalo.
Which means it'll be 10 days before we see him again. Also noted while I was looking for transaction information, the Dodgers just canned Eddie Murray as their hitting coach.
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Hopefully, we can steal another game away today. Next will be Atlanta, a team that is also in a similar mini-tailspin like the Tribe. Should be interesting to see who breaks out of their funk at the other team's expense.
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
I think Miguel is better. It's scary.
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
He may end up with Top 5-10 hitting numbers all time, but he would never pass guys who had amazing careers and played great D. But that's just me.
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
by Turkmenbashi on Jun 14, 2007 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
HEck, I imagine he rarely knows how many outs there are. He just comes in when everyone else does. He'd rather just hit, which is why it is perplexing why he doesn't make a good DH.
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
That made me lol... so true. But as to why he isn't DHing, why DH Manny when you have Ortiz? I think Ortiz would be more of a liability at first than Manny is in the outfield.
by Turkmenbashi on Jun 14, 2007 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
I've heard the same thing about Manny and commentators parrot it all the time. Like a lot of these kind of things, however, it's not really very true. His OPS is only 27 points lower as a DH as compared to LF.
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Combine it being repeated enough with Manny substantiating it and you've got a classic case of something Jeff Brantley will repeat till he dies while no one bothers to look up the numbers.
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
by Turkmenbashi on Jun 14, 2007 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
It doesn't appear you disagree. I don't really understand why you took issue with the comment.
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Top 20 is one of the best ever if there have been like, 10,000 outfielders or whatever.
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
1-BYK showing up the ump about that bunt strikeout is one of the funniest things I've seen in baseball, maybe ever.
2-Is anyone else vaguely encouraged by Clifton Phifer Lee? He's throwing the curve again (he was in Cinci too) and he's got a decent feel for it, it appears. He got stung by GAB last time out and last night (like in GAB as well) got hurt by his control.
I think (read: hope) Cliff can get his control straightened out-he's been able to do it in the past. The fact that his strikeouts are going up and his curve is back at least makes him look like a mid-4's ERA starter.
So I guess that's my point. He looks ok again.
3-FGutz looks alright hitting the ball.
4-J-H-O-N-N-Y. Doubles!
5-Hopefully we've weathered Mastny's little hiccup and he's back on track. He looked great in the little bits I saw.
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Yep, that would be me. Frankly, I don't get all of the Lee-hating going on. Here's a guy who's had a decent track record, is only a month removed from the DL and seems to be headed in the right direction.
It's puzzling that posters on LGT are tolerant of Pronk's considerable drop off in power, but are constantly attacking Lee.
Since I think I can see Lee's problem - inconsistant location whereas I have no idea what's wrong with Hafner - my gut tells me that Lee will probably return to near '06 form before Pronk does. Hopefully, both will be back on track after the All-Star break.
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Pronk is still a well above-average hitter -- still above-average among 1B/DH in fact -- despite a terrible slump. That his nubmers could be so far down, while still being a very good hitter, just shows how ridiculous his numbers have been the last few years.
I'm not sure where you get Lee "headed in the right direction." Last month he had a three-game stretch with a 3.15 ERA. Since then, the very best thing you can say about him is that he just had a two-game stretch with a 5.73 ERA -- i.e., the best you can say about him is that lately, he's just been bad rather than unbelievably bad.
Since I think I can see Lee's problem - inconsistant location whereas I have no idea what's wrong with Hafner - my gut tells me that Lee will probably return to near '06 form before Pronk does.
I'm not sure if this was a joke, but FWIW, it sounds like an ironic riff on Steve Phillips. For that matter, Lee's '06 form was also a source of aggravation, and if the best he can do is to come "near" it, he should just be demoted now.
And by "now" I actually mean "once we have someone else healthy enough to start."
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
I'm in New Jersey now. Wanna bet a cold beer on this one?
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
I wish. Lee sure doesn't strike me as one win away from being average, only very slightly less stinko than he was before one more win.
While I'm very optimistic about our team's chances this year for the postseason, Lee's performances don't get me very enthused.
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
To be honest, I would like to see Lee moved into the long relief role. This team needs a guy who can play the role of a Terry Mulholland from a few years back.
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
What's the big deal?
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
The only other option is one of the pitchers: Fultz, Hernandez, Mastny, Miller, Perez. Fultz and Henandez are not getting cut yet, so its between Miller, Mastny and Perez. Take your pick.
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
On a related note was anyone watching (through Extra Innings) the Marlins broadcast last night? They were interviewing players from the '97 team and then during the rain delay, showing highlights of the series. Time does not heal all wounds.....
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
I'm not mad about it, they were doing a local broadcast, and it is the 10th anniversary of that team. But it was gross.
Too much to hope that EI could have things like this in mind when choosing broadcasts.
Re: Game Sixty-Four: Indians 7, Marlins 3
At least Atlanta is coming to Cleveland, so even if they want to celebrate their 12th anniversary, they won't do it on the road.

by 













