Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Kansas City at Cleveland, 7:05 PM (STO)
Starting Pitchers:
Cleveland: Jeremy Sowers (7-3, 3.35 ERA)
Kansas City: Runelvys Hernandez (5-9, 6.39 ERA)
Portland at Akron, 7:05 PM
Eastern League Championship, Game 1
Starting Pitchers:
Akron: Adam Miller (15-6, 2.75 ERA)
Portland: Devern Hansack (8-7, 3.26 ERA)
First of all, congrats to the Kinston Indians: they won the Mills Cup with an extra-inning win last night. The K-Tribe had a fantastic regular season, going a combined 85-63. This championship is Kinston's second in three years.
The Aeros look to win their second consecutive Eastern League title, and will send Adam Miller to the mound for Game 1. He could have been facing Phillip Hughes, the Eastern League's other top pitching prospect, but Trenton lost to the underdog Sea Dogs in the first round.
85 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
by new zealand tribe fan on Sep 12, 2006 7:21 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
by Mark @ Let's Go Tribe! on Sep 12, 2006 7:22 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
by portlandtribefan on Sep 12, 2006 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree with you wholeheartedly!
I agree with you wholeheartedly; there was no good reason to mess up Sowers' rest - as one could tell, he wasn't laboring on 4 days rest; there was no reason to shift him out of his regular routine. Plus, as you stated, Carmona would have made his first return start against the Royals, arguably an easier assignment than the White Sox. As for pitching at Jacobs Field and maybe the fans getting on him, he's going to have to learn to pitch at Jacobs Field sometime if he remains an Indian, so what better time to start against one of the worst teams in baseball?
Re: I agree with you wholeheartedly!
by portlandtribefan on Sep 12, 2006 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Agreed again!
I agree with you again; I think inserting Carmona into the bullpen was debatable to begin with; granted, the set-up role turned out well for him, but potentially as a starter, he'd probably be a very good #3, maybe even a solid #2 over time, especially with the mid-90s velocity he was displaying as a starter and the K/IP he was showing at Buffalo, a significant increase in his K/IP rate from his earlier years in the farm system. I certainly think, in time, he COULD be better than the Lee/Westbrook/Byrd trio.
One has to wonder why Carmona wasn't sent down sooner after his disastrous week as the closer. Granted, they didn't want to ruin his confidence, but after one to two more times of not doing well in a relief role after that, one could question why he wasn't sent down then - if he had, he would have had more time to get his mechanics straightened out and get his pitch count back up so that he could really show what he could do as a starter now. Right now, I don't think we're seeing the Carmona we did see in late April when he took over for Sabathia and it's doubtful we will see that Carmona the rest of this year because, by the time he gets stretched out to around 100 pitches and regains a feel for all of his pitches in a starting role, the season will be over.
Hopefully, Carmona isn't permanently ruined and we can truly see what he is capable of in a starting role next year; after all, he only had 3 ML starts, certainly not enough time to determine whether he would be an upgrade in the long run over the LWB trio we send out there 60% of the time.
Re: I agree with you wholeheartedly!
So I hardly think the book is anywhere near closed on a guy who was considered a very good prospect based on (a) his 600-inning track record in the minors, and (b) his tender age of 22. I mean ... isn't the whole "ruining" idea just plainly stupid? Isn't it like saying Bobby Cox ruined Andy Marte last year? Or that Mike Hargroved ruined Jim Thome in 1992? Or that Gene Michael ruined Greg Maddux in 1987?
I think if you go back to Carmona's apperances, one at a time, the handling he's gotten has been pretty boiler plate. You might be able to find the one appearance, or even two, where you would have lifted him one batter earlier, or even two. But if that's all it takes to "ruin" a guy, I doubt he'd have even gotten this far -- and I doubt he'd have any chance of succeeding in the big leagues.
Re: I agree with you wholeheartedly!
by mkwng @ Let's Go Tribe! on Sep 13, 2006 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions
Re: I don't agree with you wholeheartedly!
by portlandtribefan on Sep 13, 2006 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions
Re: I don't agree with you wholeheartedly!
Of course not -- they could not be less unusual. Hopefully (and I would almost say "probably") he'll work through them, as he has worked through other issues in the past, before you and I were paying so damned much attention to every single inning he pitched.
I agree with your point - I hope you're right!
I can see your point, and I agree that Carmona probably will be okay. This is in hindsight, but it probably would have been better if the Indians had sent him down to Buffalo sooner so he could have gotten more AAA starts under his belt before being forced to come back up.
He still could finish the season strong, but it seems likely he's still trying to find himself as a starter again; if the Indians had sent him down sooner, he might have already found his dominant self from earlier this year already.
With that said, I believe he'll find himself again eventually; it would just be nice if he could finish up strong this year and go into the offseason on a good note after that rocky week as a closer.
Re: I agree with your point - I hope you're right!
In general I agree, but if you look back at the calendar you'll realize there's only a handful of dates we're talking about here. First they took him out of the closer spot to see if he'd right himself right away as a middle reliever. Well, he didn't. By that point, there was hardly any Triple-A season left.
I think also there may have been a sense of not wanting to send him down too soon after his massive breakdowns that one week ... of not wanting to send a message of "we're punishing you," which I think inevitably becomes the message if you do it right away. Look, there probably was no perfect way to deal with it, it was a crap situation.
I can see your point!
Yes, I can see why they didn't do it, as Carmona could have gotten the wrong message by being sent down right away, which could have hurt him more psychologically.
Agreed - there was no perfect way to handle the situation. If he can right himself in his next few starts, and especially next year, then he'll probably be fine, and he'll still only be 23 for next year, not old for AAA or the Majors. :-)
Re: I can see your point!
I believe that is the plan!
As I recall from one of the recent Farrell reports, I think the Indians plan on him getting 50 IP (? - I think that was the number) in Winter Ball this offseason to try to get him acclimated to starting again and to get his mechanics back in order.
I agree - it's likely next year where we'll really see what Carmona can do as a starter.
Re: I can see your point!
I'm not sure, but I think...
I know the AFL is only one month (give or take a week or so,) but the others vary (whether it be the Dominican, Venezuelan, Puerto Rican, or Mexican Leagues.)
I don't know or remember exactly how long each lasts, but I think the usual time is 1.5-2 months, maybe more than 2 months for one or two of the leagues. For Carmona to get 50 IP, and presuming he goes 5-7 IP per start, that would be about 7-10 starts. Presuming he goes every 5 days (and I think these leagues don't get many off days, a few at most,) that would indicate a season of at least 35-50 days, probably longer, so my guess is, the leagues are probably closer to 2 months each, but they have varying start times.
I know Baseball America's site did a good job on covering these leagues a few years ago, but I'm not so sure about last year. Perhaps they will list the start and end dates for these leagues, as well as daily boxscores from the games (when possible - sometimes, they can't get the boxscores.) I would check out BA's site and see if they give more info. on these leagues. Also, you may want to sign up for BA's Prospect Report email - as I recall, I think they gave the boxscores of the best Minor League prospects to play in those leagues as well, so guys like Carmona, Kouzmanoff, etc., would probably be included in that report.
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
The announcers said it was apparently his last start. Does that mean he could pitch in relief?
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
by mkwng @ Let's Go Tribe! on Sep 12, 2006 7:39 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
by The DiaTriber on Sep 12, 2006 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
I hate that this franchise has become such a joke - when I was a kid they were always one of my favorites after the Indians.
by mkwng @ Let's Go Tribe! on Sep 12, 2006 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
by The DiaTriber on Sep 12, 2006 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
by Rayman @ Let's Go Tribe! on Sep 12, 2006 7:57 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
On an unrelated note, Akron is down 4-0.
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Remember the Yanks of 90s, had some pretty good pitching then, plus fewer overpaid old vets who are happy living out the glory days of thier fat contracts.
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you were heavily imbibing when you posted this nonsense.
by SpringTrainingFun on Sep 12, 2006 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
by Rayman @ Let's Go Tribe! on Sep 12, 2006 11:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
"I have to say, I don't hate them as much as I used to."
It's probably safe to say that you are likely in the minority on this message board who feel this way.
But then, everyone is entitled to their opinion, misguided as it may be.
by SpringTrainingFun on Sep 13, 2006 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
by Rayman @ Let's Go Tribe! on Sep 13, 2006 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Thoughts about Miller!
Miller was leaving the ball up tonight, around mid-thigh or so. He settled down after the solo shot in the 3rd, but unfortunately, that was the difference in the ballgame. Miller still struck out 9 in 6 IP.
Keep in mind that Miller had one extra day of rest if I recall correctly. I believe Miller pitched Game 1 of the series against Altoona on Wednesday, which would have been 5 days of rest, not four. Plus, the soggy conditions at Akron probably didn't help either.
Ironically, Akron nearly came back in this game; if not for Wyatt Toregas getting thrown out at 2B in the eighth inning, the Aeros probably tie the ballgame up because Crowe hit a double after Toregas was thrown out at 2nd. That hurt.
This isn't the way Akron started last year against Portland, winning two at home and one of two on the road. Hopefully, Akron wins Game 2, takes at least one of the road games (if not 2,) then wins again at home if necessary. Hopefully, the rest of the staff steps up (Laffey was good in Game 2 of the Altoona series, and hopefully, will be again tomorrow.)
By the way, in his AA return, J.D. Martin pitched the 8th and 9th innings tonight, giving up 2 hits, but not allowing any runs. He had 2 ground outs and 4 fly outs.
Re: Thoughts about Miller!
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
You are placing money on this team ? On baseball ? The greyhounds can't run soon enough, eh ...
by SpringTrainingFun on Sep 12, 2006 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Betting on this team without Hafner was idiotic though. I broke even by getting the Dodgers tonight. Just find good to ok pitchers and pick them against bad teams-that's my formula.
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/statistics/sortable/index.php?cid=99976
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
But hey, lets see some Sisco action!
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
by Colin @ Let's Go Tribe! on Sep 12, 2006 9:03 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
Re: Game Thread(s): September 12, 2006
by Colin @ Let's Go Tribe! on Sep 12, 2006 9:05 PM EDT reply actions

by 













