Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees 4
Cleveland wins series 3-1
Recap
Box Score
Win Probability Added @ Fangraphs
Highest WPA:
Paul Byrd .101
Kelly Shoppach .097
Jhonny Peralta .091
Lowest WPA:
Kenny Lofton -.055
Franklin Gutierrez -.014
Monday's game lasted over 4 hours, and for most of that time the Indians were leading. For me, that meant four hours of looking forward to the 9th inning, when in all probability Joe Borowski would be coming in to finish the game. But I'm getting ahead of myself.
Paul Byrd's stuff may be the worst in baseball. But as evidenced in Game 4, stuff isn't necessarily a barrier to at least some modicum of success. That means being exceptional in some other area of the craft, whether that be control, knowing how to attack a hitter, the ability to adjust on the fly, to self-diagnose mechanical problems on the mound, and so on. Against a lineup that usually eats junkballers for breakfast, those compensatory qualities all needed to be there. And a bit of BABIP luck.
Through the first couple innings, Byrd didn't look like he'd be lasting long. He pitched around a couple singles in the first by striking out Alex Rodriguez and retiring Jorge Posada on a fly ball. Hideki Matsui, who led off the second, took exception to Byrd's double windup, and called time. Byrd took exception to the call, and it seemed to affect his control. Matsui walked, and a sharp single by Robinson Cano created the jam that could have ended Byrd's night. After getting Melky Cabrera to pop out, he walked his second of the inning to load the bases. But he made a nice pitch to Johnny Damon, inducing another pop up, and after allowing one run on a Derek Jeter single, retired Bobby Abreu to end the inning.
That second inning was one of a couple turning points in the game, points where one bad pitch could have led to disaster. The second point came in the sixth inning, with Rafael Perez struggling to throw strikes, Yankees on the corner, one out, and Derek Jeter coming to the plate. Jeter hit a hard grounder at Asdrubal Cabrera to start an inning-ending double play. Another crisis averted.
Alex Rodriguez drove in his first run of the series off Perez in the seventh. The bomb brought the lead down to three runs, which meant that Joe Borowski would be pitching the ninth (I think he would have done so anyway, but why ruin a good narrative?). To completely clarify the difference between the chief setup man and the closer, Rafael Betancourt easily dispatched the Yankees in the eighth, two on strikeouts.
I suppose it's irrational to approach the entrance of Joe Borowski with dread; after all, it means the Indians have the lead (in this case three runs), and the odds are highly stacked against a loss. But when the bottom of the ninth arrived, all rational thinking went with it. After four hours, was it really going to come down to Joe Borowski getting three outs against the middle of the Yankee order?
Derek Jeter's popout helped to diffuse a tiny bit of the fear, but Joe then proceeded to groove one down and in to Bobby Abreu. 6-4 Yankees. Now one more baserunner, and the blown save becomes a possibility. A-Rod hits one in the air...not going anywhere - whew! Two outs, and just Jorge Posada to get...NO!!......that was close. Please don't blow this, please don't blow this...YESSSSSS!
This series win wasn't an upset, though the payrolls would suggest otherwise. The Indians had the better starting pitching, the better relief pitching, and the better offense. The first two were known advantages coming into the series, but the last one was what completely swung the series to the Indians. And outside of Fausto Carmona's sublime performance in Game 2, no one player carried the team: nine different players drove in runs for the Indians, and six different players hit a home run. As a team, the Indians hit .315/.417/.524. As a team, the Indians allowed a 3.41 ERA. On paper, the Indians dominated this series. Just don't go back in time a couple of days to tell me that.
Next: The ALCS. Beckett vs. Sabathia (7:00, Friday)
0 recs |
50
comments
Comments
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
Looking forward to the the ACLS, should be great games. But I am really looking forward to watching Manny for 5,6,7 straight games. God I love the big lug, and I miss him. But we know he will be our secret weapon in this series, don't we. Here is my top 5 list of things I expect to see from "Manny the Ram" over the next week or so.
5-A 480 ft blast over the Monster.
4-Breaking 4 or 5 steps the wrong direction on a fly ball.
3-Throwing the ball to the wrong infielder in a crucial situation.
2-Sitting on the bench smiling-Standing in the field smiling, when something has just gone horribly wrong for the Bean-Sox.
1-(Drum roll......) Getting tagged out while standing motionless somewhere on the base paths.
(He must hold the MLB record for this)
If Manny comes through for us it's Series Time 07.
by HalfMan HalfNer on Oct 11, 2007 12:34 AM EDT 0 recs
Indians 6, Yankees 4
You could see this coming down the pike with headlights flashing and sirens wailing - the Yank's are a hollow oak. Formidable looking but easily toppled. Cashman's put together a terrific softball team - it's a damn good thing we weren't playing softball. Here's the bottom line: the Yankees have only one good starter - Pettitte (sp?) an aging closer and one decent - decent not great - set-up guy. That's it. So how did the Tribe beat them - easy - good pitching. It's that simple.
Like I said before, now comes the hard part. The BoSox have got pitching - almost as good as ours. And they can hit - Ortiz and Manny are better - that's right better - than Jeter and A-Rod - and they've got a great supporting cast surrounding them. Our hitter's are gonna hafta step up. Pronk's gotta be Pronk - not bizzaro Pronk - but the line drive smashing RBI machine of previous years. If Vic stay Vic and the rest of the boyz play their game - Grandy, Kenny, Gutz and Buzz set the table and Vic, Jhonny and Pronk drive `em in - we're gonna be all right.
Just be ready to lose a few here, cuz it's gonna take all seven games for the Tribe to win it. This is gonna be a war.
by mauichuck on Oct 11, 2007 7:29 AM EDT 0 recs
Re: Indians 6, Yankees 4
Wang is probably among the Top 10 starters in the league. Rivera "aging" is still one of the very best closers out there. And in limited appearances, Joba has been nothing short of great.
The Indians beat the Yankees not only with great pitching, but also with patient hitting and three dominating relievers.
by Jay on
Oct 11, 2007 10:48 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Indians 6, Yankees 4
Wang is in the top 10 you say? OK then which one of these guys does he jump over? CC, Carmona, Lackey, Haren, Beckett, Kazmir, Verlander, Halladay, Santana, Bonderman or Dice K? Hell I'll even throw Pettitte in there, since that's who I was talking about.
I didn't say that the Yankee's were a mediocre team I said their Achilles' heal was pitching and in a five game series - as this week has shown - pitching is key.
It would be foolish to downplay the Yankee's offense, but, as the late 90's Indians have shown, offense is not enough.
BTW, whoever signs Rivera for whatever is gonna get taken. And Joe, Perez and Lewis are the gems, Joba's good, but I'll take either of our guys. Save this post and let's see if I'm right.
by mauichuck on
Oct 11, 2007 1:18 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Indians 6, Yankees 4
And taking Joba's highest ERA is the definition of cherry picking stats. The guy was dominant in High A and in AAA. Overall, his ERA was 2.45 for the year. The guy is 21 and went from High A to becoming a dominant reliever in the same year. That's beyond phenomonal. We give Lofgren a free pass on a shitty year because he was 21 and in AA, which is still young. But he pales in comparison to Joba. They probably shouldn't even be discussed in the same sentence. It sucks that the Yankees have the best two pitching prospects in baseball but it doesn't make it any less true.
by Joe on
Oct 11, 2007 1:25 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Indians 6, Yankees 4
by Joe on
Oct 11, 2007 12:52 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Indians 6, Yankees 4
And Ortiz and Manny better than A-Rod and Jeter? Maybe Jeter, but we ain't got jack on A-Rod. I do think--at least on a good day--we can outhit you, but pitching is definitely gonna be the key. This series is going to give new meaning to the phrase "pitcher's duel".
by OTMsdkramer on
Oct 11, 2007 1:31 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Indians 6, Yankees 4
I do think Carmona is a better pitcher than Wang and he will seperate himself more in the coming years. However, this year they were not that different as pitchers.
by Joe on
Oct 11, 2007 1:37 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Indians 6, Yankees 4
Maybe I've got my anti-Yankee bias distorting my view, but what I saw of Joba in the second game of the series didn't impress me. Excellent curve, OK heater and mediocre location. He looks hitable to me, not the second coming of Roger Clemens - or Kerry Wood for that matter.
And Cashman is an idiot. Any GM worth his executive washroom key could put together a more well balanced team than the Yankees. Unlike the Tribe and the BoSox, they're built to win play-off spots but not championships.
Anyway let's drop this - we've got bigger fish to fry. We can pick this up in the off-season. These Sawx characters are tough - it's gonna take all our mojo, concentration, and bleacher bum managing to beat 'em.
by mauichuck on
Oct 11, 2007 1:46 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Indians 6, Yankees 4
by Joe on
Oct 11, 2007 1:48 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Indians 6, Yankees 4
Joe, the similarities between Wang and Carmona have been overplayed -- a lot. Carmona gets more groundballs and more strikeouts and significantly fewer line drives. He also allows significantly fewer runs, and he's age 23 to Wang's 27, so you know where the trends are pointing.
by Jay on
Oct 11, 2007 3:07 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Indians 6, Yankees 4
by Joe on
Oct 11, 2007 3:57 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Indians 6, Yankees 4
by Jay on
Oct 11, 2007 5:30 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Indians 6, Yankees 4
Although I do think you have a point about his luck with home runs. His HR/F is at 5%. That's absurd.I'd say we can expect a regression from Wang next year, although his K rate did improve significantly this year.
by Joe on
Oct 11, 2007 8:38 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Bert Blyleven Knows Baseball.
"Casey Blake seems to almost always come up with the big hit. The Red Sox need to have Blake's measure in order not to get burned by him in a critical spot."
Also!
"The set-up man is right-hander Hideki Okajima"
Right-hander, is he? Now that's some crack research!
by tabler84 on Oct 11, 2007 8:22 AM EDT 0 recs
Re: Bert Blyleven Knows Baseball.
Didn't Blake bat like .000038 w/ RISP this year?
by DontCallMeJoey on
Oct 11, 2007 8:16 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
"Rafael Perez, the lefty who threw six innings in the series, ranking second on the team to Fausto Carmona, profiles as a starter next year, and a really good one."
Has anyone heard anything about this? I can't imagine they'll move Perez to the rotation next year, though I can't say I'd be disappointed. If the FO believes he can make the transition smoothly, then you have to make the move - under the theory that a SP is always going to be more valuable than a middle reliever.
Thoughts?
by jakesinger777 on Oct 11, 2007 8:34 AM EDT 0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
by nickjs21 on
Oct 11, 2007 8:41 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
by zempf on Oct 11, 2007 9:11 AM EDT 0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
by Casey Jones on
Oct 11, 2007 10:38 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
by Casey Jones on
Oct 12, 2007 11:53 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six:
by emil minty on Oct 11, 2007 10:21 AM EDT 0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
by fleerdon on Oct 11, 2007 11:10 AM EDT 0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
by fleerdon on
Oct 11, 2007 11:10 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
Can you imagine how pissed we'd all be if we'd given up someone of consequence for Eric Gagne (he of the 6.75 ERA after coming over to Boston, who was basically a mop-up man in the LDS)?
by zempf on
Oct 11, 2007 11:54 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
I'm having a hard time believing that of all our possible trade partners at the deadline, the Rangers were the most reasonable. I'll grant you, Max may make me eat those words, but sheesh.
by fleerdon on
Oct 11, 2007 12:04 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
Between catcher, first base and DH, there isn't much room for a rookie to break the lineup - whether he moves to another position, or one of the players up here moves positions. Ramirez might well develop into a solid major leaguer, but he was the right guy at the right time for Shapiro to bring back value in a trade.
by Casey Jones on
Oct 12, 2007 12:05 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
I was pimping Francisco for Dotel big time, and I think that was the standing offer to KC. I still think that would have been a good deal at the time; obviously in hindsight I'm glad we didn't give up anything for Dotel.
I like Ben Francisco, I just don't think he's a future "core" player we should shy away from trading if it'll net us a guy we need in the short term. Gutierrez OTOH looks like a core player.
by mrich on
Oct 11, 2007 12:16 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
by zempf on
Oct 11, 2007 12:25 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
by fleerdon on
Oct 11, 2007 8:33 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six
Is it Friday yet?
by Brick. on Oct 11, 2007 11:39 AM EDT 0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six
Sorry for all the pimping other people's stuff... I'm bored. Figure other people might be too...
by Brick. on
Oct 11, 2007 12:07 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six
by Turkmenbashi on
Oct 11, 2007 12:29 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
Just a note to thank you for these game recap posts. In my opinion they are consistently the best and most objective posts on this site; consistently very good reading.
by Fiddlesticks on Oct 11, 2007 1:14 PM EDT 0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-4
by Joe on Oct 11, 2007 1:39 PM EDT 0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-4
by Toxicadam on
Oct 11, 2007 2:24 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
by ASP on Oct 11, 2007 3:30 PM EDT 0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
by paul sorrento to cooperstown on
Oct 11, 2007 3:47 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
Drew is 0-3 with 3 K's
by DaytonDogg on
Oct 11, 2007 4:21 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
by nickjs21 on
Oct 11, 2007 4:36 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
by DaytonDogg on
Oct 11, 2007 4:38 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
by nickjs21 on
Oct 11, 2007 4:40 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
by nickjs21 on
Oct 11, 2007 4:40 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
Francona also confirmed that Bobby Kielty will get the start tomorrow against C.C. Sabathia in place of J.D. Drew in right field.
Also announced C Kevin Cash would be dropped from the ALCS roster and P Tim Wakefield would be added. The Sox carried 3 catchers in the ALDS and 10 pitchers. Now, 11 pitchers, 2 catchers.
by Ish on
Oct 11, 2007 10:16 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
by ASP on
Oct 11, 2007 11:04 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six: Indians 6, Yankees
by nickjs21 on
Oct 11, 2007 11:07 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six
- The NL is boring.
- The 40-man roster pulldown on the sidebar which I've never used before is out of date and still has Jason Davis on it.
by Brick. on Oct 11, 2007 10:56 PM EDT 0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six
by Ryan on
Oct 11, 2007 11:07 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six
i've been through my bookmarks 3 times and just can't get into this game - unruly fans or no...
by Brick. on
Oct 11, 2007 11:13 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Six
by Buckeye Brad on
Oct 11, 2007 11:34 PM EDT
up
0 recs









