Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red Sox 2
Indians lead series 2-1
Recap
Box Score
Win Probability Added @ Fangraphs
Highest WPA:
Jake Westbrook .221
Kenny Lofton .181
Rafael Betancourt .078
Joe Borowski .078
Lowest WPA:
Jhonny Peralta -.053
Victor Martinez -.043
Trot Nixon -.026
This game was nothing like Sunday's marathon: it was a taut well-pitched game. Well, the outcome was the same.
Jake Westbrook brought sanity back to the starting staff, throwing 6.2 innings. If you didn't know any better, he pitched an average Jake Westbrook start, getting a couple of key double plays, keeping the pitch count down, and leaving the bullpen with a short night. Of course, he did this against the Boston Red Sox, the team that solved the Indians' other sinkerballer last night by waiting for a first-pitch strike. Jake was able to throw quality strikes early in the count, dictating the terms of the at-bat.
The big offensive blow came on Kenny Lofton's two-run homer in the second. From my vantage point, I initially couldn't make out whether the ball had cleared the right field fence, or even if JD Drew had made the catch. But it did, and a crowd who cheered the loudest for Lofton during introductions erupted as he rounded the bases. After Kenny and Victor performed an elaborate celebratory handshake (or is "bodyshake" a more appropriate term?), he bounded out of the dugout and doffed his helmet to the fans.
The Indians' bullpen was great, retiring all seven batters they faced. Rafael Betancourt especially deserves a lot of credit, retiring Youkilis, Ortiz, and Ramirez in order in the eighth. Yeah, Joe Borowski got the save, but just awarding Betancourt a hold doesn't seen appropriate.
This was my first time at a Jacobs Field playoff game, and it was different that any regular season contest. The fans didn't need much coaxing from the digital cheerleaders; they were on their feet early and often, whether it was with two strikes on a Boston player, or runners on in the bottom of an inning. When Borowski came on in the ninth, the mood was anticipatory but hesitant. Everyone was on their feet, hoping for an easy inning, but knowing that just one base runner brings the tying run to the plate. And in case you didn't notice, Borowski allows a lot of base runners. But, other than a long battle with Jason Varitek, he retired the Boston hitters rather easily. And with that, a happy stadium-full of Indians fans poured out of Jacobs Field, and blared their horns on their way out of downtown Cleveland.
Next Up: Wakefield* vs. Byrd, 8:21 PM.
*Subject to change
0 recs |
92
comments
Comments
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine:
You may now return to your regularly scheduled ALCS. Leaving for Cleveland now, I'll be out of the blogosphere until Wednesday night (assuming no rain, fingers crossed).
by supermarioelia on Oct 16, 2007 7:05 AM EDT 0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine:
by Roger Dorn on
Oct 16, 2007 7:53 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine:
by CU Adam on
Oct 16, 2007 12:33 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game 169
I should have DVRed it.
by JulioBernazard on Oct 16, 2007 7:57 AM EDT 0 recs
Re: Game 169
by TheVanillaGorilla on
Oct 16, 2007 11:42 AM EDT
up
0 recs
: Indians 4, Red Sox 2
New Garko blogpost.
FOX does a wonderful job with mic'ing the crowd. You could feel how insane the atmosphere was there in the Jake. After the Lofton homerun, the broadcast crew remained silent for about 5-8 seconds and allowed you to really revel in the fanfare. Amazing moment.
---
As an aside, I was re-watching that game last night and was disappointed at how the hitters did in 3-2 counts. I think 4 or 5 times we swung at ball 4 in those counts. A little too aggressive and really helped out Dice-K.
by Toxicadam on Oct 16, 2007 9:00 AM EDT 0 recs
Re: : Indians 4, Red Sox 2
I actually timed it out -- Joe Buck and Tim McCarver remained silent for 54 seconds following the Lofton homer. That's an eternity on television. Kudos to them.
by tabler84 on
Oct 16, 2007 9:08 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: : Indians 4, Red Sox 2
by Toxicadam on
Oct 16, 2007 11:00 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: : Indians 4, Red Sox 2
by Roger Dorn on
Oct 16, 2007 9:49 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine
by MTF on Oct 16, 2007 9:17 AM EDT 0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine
Kenny is probably aware that he shouldn't be swinging from his heels on every pitch. The Sox have had success, though, when they attack him up in the strike zone. He sends more popups and weak fly balls when you pitch him up in the zone.
by tabler84 on
Oct 16, 2007 9:52 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine
For years you could tell when Kenny Lofton was going to have a bad game based upon whether or not he was trying to drive the ball out of the park. So, when he hit that HR, my first reaction was out of habit, "oh nooooo, not that Kenny". I know it seems out of place, and Kenny is different now. Older. Wiser. I hope.
Certainly the result last night was different!
by MTF on
Oct 16, 2007 10:18 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine
I recall his power-hitting efforts very well. I also enjoy the WMH references when Kenny pops up and "owes Wedge 20." :)
That's why I pointed out the Sox' success in pitching Kenny up in the zone. He has a hard time getting on top of pitches that are up, and his lack of power can generate lazy fly balls.
But I also appreciate Kenny's savvy. I think he knows much more than we do...
by tabler84 on
Oct 16, 2007 10:22 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Indians 4, Red Sox 2
Also, I normally don't pay much attention to the in-between innnings jumobotron videos, but they were fantastic last night. Early in the game they got a guy mock humping a tree out near Heritage Park (during the sexiest fan promo). Later they zoomed in on the Miller High Life guy (awesome). There were other great jumbotron moments, but they're escaping me at the moment.
by APV on Oct 16, 2007 9:21 AM EDT 0 recs
Re: Indians 4, Red Sox 2
He must be from Cleveland.
by afh4 on
Oct 16, 2007 9:45 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Indians 4, Red Sox 2
by The Animal on
Oct 16, 2007 10:06 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Indians 4, Red Sox 2
must just be a marketing scheme
by The Animal on
Oct 16, 2007 10:20 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Indians 4, Red Sox 2
by Rachie on
Oct 16, 2007 2:37 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Indians 4, Red Sox 2
by APV on
Oct 16, 2007 3:28 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Indians 4, Red Sox 2
by mauichuck on
Oct 16, 2007 3:42 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Indians 4, Red Sox 2
by APV on
Oct 16, 2007 4:11 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Indians 4, Red Sox 2
by rolub on
Oct 16, 2007 4:24 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
Now, however, he is faced with some difficult lineup choices. Start Beckett in game 4, with the opportunity to start him in game 7? Waiting until game 5 means Beckett will not be available for game 7. I've seen the arguments against this approach, but Beckett has been the only pitcher he can have confidence in. Schilling might be okay, but I don't know how much stock you put in the ALDS game against the AAAA Angels. Dice-K is shot, and Wakefield hasn't pitched in over 2 weeks and he was not on the ALDS roster due to a bad back. People make a big deal about Wakefield's August performance, but that was against Tampa Bay and Chicago. He was pedestrian at best in September.
Besides the Wakefield question, Francona must also wonder about Ellsbury. This kid is the real deal and would be a big improvement over Coco or Drew. Slip him into the leadoff spot and move Pedroia down to sixth in the order - this changes the complexion of the Red Sox lineup. No longer would we be able to relax after Lowell's AB.
by Spidey on Oct 16, 2007 9:53 AM EDT 0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
Managers deserve some level of credit for keeping teams psychologically together but I can't give anybody trotting out Youklis, Ramirez, Beckett, Schilling, Pap, MDC, Okajima, Ortiz, and Lowell anything over 5% of the credit for a team's success.
I get similarly upset when Theo is referred to as a boy genius or part of a brain trust or any of that. There is a moratorium on complimenting Theo after the mess he made the last couple of seasons with Drew, Matsuzaka, Clement, Gagne and Lugo. I know they have money to waste but sheesh.
To be fair they draft great and develop well.
That wasn't really related to your comments, sorry. I wasn't really responding to you it just set me off.
Anyways, to answer your question, I don't think Francona's making the Wakefield decision actively. I think it was decided beforehand that this is what they would do and now they're just executing the plan. They'd rather try to steal one with Wake-Byrd then win Beckett-Byrd and lose Wake-CC, then have to go Fausto-Schill in elimination. They're trying to win both of these games and they think this is the best plan.
That said, I think it's a pretty ridiculous decision and smells like the Clemens move. I don't see how you can ever start a guy on this many days rest in the freaking playoffs. I'd start Lester before Wake.
Wake gave up a HR to Royce Clayton in a simulated game the other day. Royce Clayton.
by afh4 on
Oct 16, 2007 10:05 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
Dice-K also had a simulated game between the ALDS and ALCS and did not look good - nice foreshadowing.
The drafting has been good, to his credit, but I also think Theo's abilities are overstated. In fact several Red Sox fans are referring to Theo in terms of BGS and AGS (Before Gorilla Suit and After Gorilla Suit, when he left Fenway at the end of 2005 season). Since he came back, the team has had some questionable FA signings, to say the least...
I still give Francona credit for winning the WS and returning to the playoffs the following season. Plus, he is very good with the media, explaining his decisions. Genius? That's a little strong. I think there are good managers for specific types of teams. Francona is a great fit for the Red Sox.
Interesting idea to start Lester instead of Wakefield. It would be a different story if Buchholz were available.
I really think Tito will start Wakefield, but have a quick hook for Lester. Starting Ellsbury, on the other hand, is a no-brainer.
by Spidey on
Oct 16, 2007 10:27 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
The quotes aren't reassuring anyway:
He declined interview requests after the outing, but when asked how he felt he said, "Feel good enough."
Good enough? Maybe it's a turn of phrase but I'll grasp at these straws.
Also, from Theo's wiki page regarding the gorilla suit is this gem:
by afh4 on
Oct 16, 2007 10:36 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
That Theo story is outrageous.
He is a sharp guy - no doubt about that. But, the dynamic in the management team for the Red Sox is dysfunctional. Between the Yankees and the Red Sox, I could make an argument that the Red Sox are in greater need to make management changes - if they lose the ALCS, but that is a story for another day AND relies on a very big IF.
by Spidey on
Oct 16, 2007 11:09 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
by 7foot3 on
Oct 16, 2007 10:33 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
On a general note, I think this whole "AAAA" thing has gotten out of hand and people are using it way too much. If every team in MLB except for 2 or 3 is AAAA, doesn't that make the entire major leagues AAAA? I guess that makes sense since it is one level above AAA (which is one level above AA), I'd just rather call them the majors.
by Nat on
Oct 16, 2007 10:11 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
by afh4 on
Oct 16, 2007 10:14 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
by Nat on
Oct 16, 2007 10:15 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
by afh4 on
Oct 16, 2007 10:18 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
I think we all see that final records mean nothing when it comes to the playoffs- just look at the Rockies. What matters is team health, preparation, and emotional condition - the team has already shown that it has some ability to win. The Angels were lacking in all three.
Finally, consider this article from the Globe:
The writer makes the point that the Red Sox have yet to be challenged this season. If the Angels were anything like their regular season selves (and put up a fight), he would not be writing this.
by Spidey on
Oct 16, 2007 10:43 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
I'm not saying that Schilling and the other teammates that have "come up small" (using Schilling's phrase) will continue to come up small. Prior to 2007, they have shown the ability to come up big. But, recent performance has not shown that to be the case. I think the only guy that has truly proven himself is Beckett. The rest have not - but they still have the talent to do it.
by Spidey on
Oct 16, 2007 10:51 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
by tabler84 on
Oct 16, 2007 10:16 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
(How long until Rockies or D-Backs fans go nuts?)
by tabler84 on
Oct 16, 2007 10:15 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
by afh4 on
Oct 16, 2007 10:19 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
I was perusing all the FA moves this past season and almost every NL hitter that came to the AL struggled. The only exceptions were guys like Lofton who have bounced all around the league.
So even if the Rockies continue their incredible run .. it doesn't change the fact that the AL is deeper and stronger overall.
by Toxicadam on
Oct 16, 2007 11:07 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
Baseball is much more vulnerable to unlikely champions than, say, the NBA or even the NFL. That's the nature of our great game.
And regardless of what league they play in, the Rox fans should be pumped. It's a truly historic run.
by tabler84 on
Oct 16, 2007 11:30 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
by DaytonDogg on
Oct 16, 2007 11:35 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine:
BTW anybody else catch the postgame interview with Westbrook where the reported asked him something to the effect of how his four-seamer was working and Westbrook said, "I don't throw a four-seamer". Shows how much the reporters know/research.
by mauichuck on Oct 16, 2007 10:03 AM EDT 0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine:
That was pretty hilarious. Jake seemed almost embarrassed to have to call him out.
by tabler84 on
Oct 16, 2007 10:09 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine:
by afh4 on
Oct 16, 2007 10:12 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine:
by Ryan on
Oct 16, 2007 10:23 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine:
by BostonWahoo on
Oct 16, 2007 10:55 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine:
Let's give our boyz proper respect. Brother Westbrook is a damn fine pitcher and we should acknowledge that.
by mauichuck on
Oct 16, 2007 11:08 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine:
The Fox gun had Westbrook at 93 last night, so probably more like 91. Safe to say Wakefield won't touch that.
by CBusSteve on
Oct 16, 2007 11:15 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine:
by tabler84 on
Oct 16, 2007 11:22 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine:
Sorry.
by mauichuck on
Oct 16, 2007 11:27 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine:
by BostonWahoo on
Oct 16, 2007 11:53 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine:
by APV on
Oct 16, 2007 11:13 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine:
by JulioBernazard on
Oct 16, 2007 12:03 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine:
by JulioBernazard on
Oct 16, 2007 12:08 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine:
by Spidey on
Oct 16, 2007 12:12 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine:
by maledicta on
Oct 16, 2007 2:32 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
by ASP on Oct 16, 2007 10:14 AM EDT 0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
by tabler84 on
Oct 16, 2007 10:37 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
Personally, I think Mastny established that the Indians have to reclaim the high inside corner against those two. They're always elbowing into the zone? Well, that's their problem.
This is premature, but how great would it be if Tom's really as together as he's looked so far? Another real reliever would be fantastic.
by fleerdon on Oct 16, 2007 10:40 AM EDT 0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
by tribe fan in Rochester on Oct 16, 2007 10:43 AM EDT 0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
by tabler84 on
Oct 16, 2007 10:54 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Byrrrrrrd.
4 walks or more: zero times.
3 walks: 1 time.
2 walks: 8 times.
1 walk: 11 times.
0 walks: 12 times.
I have to think we won't be seeing a slew of bases on balls. Byrd will make the Sox beat him. And they just might, of course, but he won't give it away.
by tabler84 on Oct 16, 2007 11:40 AM EDT 0 recs
Re: Byrrrrrrd.
Last night when Jake got that awful strike 1 call on the 3-0 pitch to Manny, I was upset. Better to walk Manny than give up a big hit. [Does anyone think that strike one to Manny was not a makeup call for the horrid ball 1 call?]
I also hope that Byrd's reputation will help with the umpire.
by Spidey on
Oct 16, 2007 11:57 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Byrrrrrrd.
by APV on
Oct 16, 2007 12:13 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Byrrrrrrd.
by tabler84 on
Oct 16, 2007 2:57 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Indians 4, Red Sox 2
by APV on Oct 16, 2007 11:45 AM EDT 0 recs
Re: Indians 4, Red Sox 2
by Roger Dorn on
Oct 16, 2007 1:09 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
by zempf on Oct 16, 2007 12:48 PM EDT 0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Nine: Indians 4, Red So
by Nat on
Oct 16, 2007 12:54 PM EDT
up
0 recs


