Byrd Prescribed HGH
The last thing the Indians needed was an off-the-field controversy the day of their most important game in 10 years, but they have it.
Lance Williams and Mark Fainaru-Wada, sports writers for the San Francisco Chronicle, and the authors of Game of Shadows, a steroids expose, published this in Sunday's Chronicle:
Sounds very bad, correct? Byrd bought HGH, which is banned by MLB, from a clinic that's being investigated by law enforcement. No test exists that can detect whether a player has been injecting the hormone, mainly because the human body manufactures HGH naturally.
A couple hours after the story broke, Paul Byrd gave his side of the story in an interview with Ken Rosenthal:
Byrd said that three different doctors diagnosed him as suffering from adult growth-hormone deficiency. In spring training, he said, he was diagnosed with a tumor on his pituitary gland at the base of his brain, a condition that may have contributed to his deficiency, doctors told him.
If what Byrd is saying checks out, that the hormones were prescribed to treat a diagnosed pituitary disorder, and MLB and the Indians knew about this, the only controversy is that he received legally prescribed drugs from a clinic that is under investigation for distributing drugs for performance-enhancing.
Whatever the outcome, this story is horrible timing for a team about to play for their playoff lives.
0 recs |
41 comments
Comments
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
Let Byrd take all the attention. He's not pitching tonight. The only person that matters it the guy who is.
Keep. Us. In. The. Game.
by timebonus on
Oct 21, 2007 1:32 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by supermarioelia on
Oct 21, 2007 1:39 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by ColumbusOhioFan on
Oct 21, 2007 1:39 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
Oh well, I suppose if you make decisions you need to deal with the consequences.
by cclemens31 on
Oct 21, 2007 1:57 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by timebonus on
Oct 21, 2007 2:00 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by crazymoloh on
Oct 21, 2007 2:09 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by timebonus on
Oct 21, 2007 2:15 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by osoc13 on
Oct 21, 2007 2:20 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by crazymoloh on
Oct 21, 2007 2:24 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by timebonus on
Oct 21, 2007 2:27 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by supermarioelia on
Oct 21, 2007 2:03 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
HGH is not crack. There are appropriate medical uses for HGH. We don't have all the facts (and the facts may be none of our business), but the initial information appears to be that Byrd's doctors prescribed HGH for an appropriate medical purpose.
Let's not worry about it unless and until it becomes a matter for our concern.
We have more important and more pressing questions to consider:
Can Jake keep the ball down and the Red Sox off the bases?
Can our young line-up keep their sphincters loose in the Biggest Game of Their Lives?
Can Pronk hit the ball out of the infield?
Can Trot Nixon write a story for the ages?
by JamesPowell on
Oct 21, 2007 2:14 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
Somethings I wish the 'reporters' paid heed to are...
(1) Paul Byrd should NEVER be expected to make available is medical history to ANYONE other than his employers. He wasn't hiding anything. It is a matter of privacy.
(2) Why didn't the Chronicle seek to get a response from Paul Byrd, who seems completely willing to discuss the issue? A tad irresponsible.
by crazymoloh on
Oct 21, 2007 2:23 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
Before Chuck rips you a new one, I will. HGH is a polypeptide hormone, not a steroid. Please be responsible.
by supermarioelia on
Oct 21, 2007 2:27 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by crazymoloh on
Oct 21, 2007 2:30 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
I'm sure the people who wrote and published the Byrd/HGH story think it is important and interesting. Maybe it is, but today I got more important and more interesting things to think and talk about.
It's the ALCS. It's Game Seven. It's the stuff of legends.
The Byrd story? Ask me about it on Tuesday.
by JamesPowell on
Oct 21, 2007 3:00 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by JulioBernazard on
Oct 21, 2007 3:29 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by supermarioelia on
Oct 21, 2007 2:17 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by vbc3 on
Oct 21, 2007 2:57 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by ColumbusOhioFan on
Oct 21, 2007 3:43 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by Brick. on
Oct 21, 2007 3:55 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by Brick. on
Oct 21, 2007 3:57 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
our national innocence is shaken
Hellfire awaits you Byrd. Just like it does your buddy betancourt.
by royalsreview on
Oct 21, 2007 4:16 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by osoc13 on
Oct 21, 2007 4:18 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by osoc13 on
Oct 21, 2007 4:20 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
Why its news:
- He bought 25k worth of a controlled drug, illegal to use without a VALID prescription.
- He bought from an anti-aging clinic under investigation by the New York District Attorney's office for distributing controlled substances illegally.
- Two of his prescriptions came from a freaking Dentist. LOL, please explain that if you can.
- Several Cleveland media sources have denied this story.
- Umm...BALCO?
- There is going to be a release of more names after the World Series and the attorneys for the investigation have contacted every team to warn them.
- and of course he won a game in the freaking ALCS, the most important sports event currently going on.
If you want to defend you boy, that fine, he is a crafty pitcher who stepped up, but please don't lie to yourself and say this is not an important story to baseball.
However, I do agree this story will not make Dice-k throw strikes with men on or keep Westbrook's sinker down.
by SoxAcumen on
Oct 21, 2007 4:25 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by osoc13 on
Oct 21, 2007 4:30 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
Go watch ESPN and tell me this is not a major story. Would you like to bet this is not one of the top lead ins to tonights game on FOX?
ESPN News is running this ahead of every NFL game, every ALCS preview, over NASCAR, over bowling, everything.
So blow it off, but its the #1 sports story of the day.
Maybe you need to call your Dentist and get something for your pain.
by SoxAcumen on
Oct 21, 2007 4:43 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
You are made no attempt to engage in the conversation. Instead you felt compelled to tell us why it was a huge story and why we needed to stop lying to ourselves. Not engaging in the conversation makes you a prick. The rest makes you sanctimonious.
by osoc13 on
Oct 21, 2007 4:53 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
ESPN is a joke.
by Jay on
Oct 21, 2007 5:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No offense, but the timing of this story is VERY
That's why I think some of us are a bit annoyed - this young team that has been rattled the last two days didn't need a distraction like this TODAY, and there was no real reason it had to be revealed TODAY unless someone wants to try to put the Indians at a disadvantage, and while one would hope that this team is stronger and bigger than that, this story breaking TODAY certainly does NOT help.
I hope the Indians do take the "us against the world" mentality and shock the world, since I suspect most expect Boston to win this game. I'd love nothing better than to see the Indians win this game, and I sure hope they do.
Just my 2 cents - no offense. :-)
by indiansfan on
Oct 21, 2007 6:13 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
- Okay, but he claims he had a prescription.
- Just because the clinic is under investigation doesn't mean this transaction was illegal. If he had a prescription, it wasn't.
- The more important point here is that this dentist may have had his license suspended at the time he wrote these prescriptions.
- I don't know what this means, or why it's relevant.
- "BALCO" is a word. To form a sentence, one must put other words around this word to create a predicate for the subject.
- Yes, but I don't see how that matters here. We don't know if Byrd's going to be implicated in the Mitchell investigation or not.
- According to the report, Byrd's purchases lasted from "between August 2002 and January 2005," when MLB formally banned HGH. Byrd won game 4 last week, well after he's known to have taken it. Claiming this series is somehow tainted by the involvement of a guy who took supplements years ago is just whining and making excuses for the loss... not that a Sox fan would ever do that.
by maledicta on
Oct 21, 2007 4:59 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by Ryan on
Oct 21, 2007 4:59 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
Last night the lead-in was the 2004 Sox comeback. Does that make it news?
by CU Adam on
Oct 21, 2007 4:53 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
If HGH was not banned by MLB before 2005, why is this a story? I remember having this same reaction to the Ankiel news. If they were taking something not banned by baseball and stopped when it becamse so, it doesn't seem to be a story worth getting worked up about.
If the #4 starter for the Marlins revealed today he had taken HGH BEFORE it was banned, do you think we would even know about it??
by swarty on
Oct 21, 2007 6:20 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by E5 on
Oct 21, 2007 6:24 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by razzpunk on
Oct 21, 2007 6:37 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
As far as the HGH, A Freakin' DENTIST? You may decide to be willfully obtuse and say it was not against MLB rules at the time, but bogus prescriptions have long been against the law. For what it is worth, I audit physician claims for a living and both parties are culpable.
Your second point is the only one that matters. Westbrook stoned the Sox and can do it again. Regardless of all the other crap at 8:23 a well paid Asian man is going to throw a ball. Let's see what happens...
by eastcoastbias on
Oct 21, 2007 6:46 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
- Mark Shapiro's statement this morning made it sound like he did not, in fact, have prior knowledge of Byrd taking HGH. Now, Byrd has said he has long since stopped taking it. But I would assume that all important parties -- including team doctors -- would know since. Byrd has indicated his teams were aware.
- Byrd said today that the SF Chronicle reporters got a hold of him three days ago. He said he told them no comment and they could run their story. HUH? Why not give them the same explanation that he gave today? More importantly, why not call your own press conference, with your doctor at your side, to get out ahead of it? "The SF Chronicle is going to run a story about me using HGH, and my doctor and I wanted you to know the real deal."
- Byrd says he does not remember the names of the doctors involved. This is hard to believe. I had a cardio-ablation done on my heart 11 years ago, at the age of 18, and I remember the name of the entire medical staff who was involved. Byrd had to stick a needle in his thigh every night. But he didn't know the doctors who told him to do so?
Regardless, as long as he was not taking HGH this season, I don't currently care. That's for MLB to hash out. Paul went out there with 86 mph stuff this week and beat the Sox. He should be proud.
by tabler84 on
Oct 21, 2007 6:58 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by supermarioelia on
Oct 21, 2007 7:04 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Byrd Prescribed HGH
by osoc13 on
Oct 21, 2007 8:22 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
















