Free Royals and dodged bullets
Royals pitchers Odalis Perez and David Riske will hit the market as free agents next week.
Perez was several free agent starters the Indians pursued prior to the 2005 season. He ended up signing a three-year, $24 million deal with the Dodgers, a deal that can fairly be called a disaster for them. He was traded to the Royals in mid-2006, but the Dodgers continued to pay most of his salary. The Indians also pursued Jon Lieber and Matt Clement that offseason, and they too went on to sign three-year deals in the $25 million range with the Phillies and Red Sox respectively. Lieber's deal ends up looking the best, but that ain't saying much.
Shut out of the primary market, the Indians ended up taking a flier on the recently rehabbed Kevin Millwood for the 2005 season, replacing him with Paul Byrd for the next two seasons, at a total cost of $21 million. While the Indians deserve credit for two smart contracts that both worked out, it's also fair to say they dodged a few bullets by losing the bidding for the first three.
As for Riske, he's coming off a stellar year, and his contract allowed him to convert a 2008 team option into a player option if he appeared in 60 games, which he reached with ease. Drafted and developed by the Indians, he was coming off an excellent three-year run when he was thrown into the Crisp-Marte trade in January 2006 -- and some of us never have figured out how the Indians could have preferred Guillermo Mota to him. Riske went on the DL almost immediately after joining Boston last April and was soon traded to the White Sox, where he waited out free agency.
This season, he struggled out of the gate with a 6.97 ERA in April, but he rebounded with 18 straight scoreless appearances from May 1 through June 8, and he finished strong with a 2.30 from that point on. Riske can be a confusing pitcher, never that many strikeouts, not exceptional at avoiding free passes and somewhat prone to the long ball. Yet he's undeniably effective at inducing bad contact, allowing only a .256 BABIP over the past five seasons, and he's always handled lefties well.
We've never really gotten a straight answer from the Indians on Riske, only an oft-repeated rumor that Wedge didn't trust him. Even so, given the organization's new religion on bullpen depth, you would think that the Indians wouldn't pass up an opportunity to get back a quality reliever. Then again, Riske seems like exactly the kind of guy the Yankees like to give $15 million deals to.
44 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
by JulioBernazard on Oct 31, 2007 12:48 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
That being said, he'll be a pretty poor investment this offseason since he's going to get a three year deal, and I don't think we'll be too interested in a bidding war with the Orioles, Yankees, Mets, and whoever else wants to buy a bullpen.
by Kos @ Let's Go Tribe! on Oct 31, 2007 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
In 2005, he again wasn't the closer, and my impression was that Wedge was careful with his use. I know "holds" is far from the most useful stat, but the fact that Riske pitched in 58 games and had 0 holds (1 save) supports that impression. Again, his overall numbers were fine.
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
I don't think it's necessarily true that Shapiro and the front office thought Mota > Riske. If Wedge didn't trust Riske, there was no point in keeping him, and I always assumed that's why the swap was made (since it's not common to see players of the same position traded for each other). I mean, you could have Albert Pujols on your bench, but if your manager only uses him as a pinch hitter, it's probably smart to trade him for 90% of his value and replace him with someone your manager will actually play. Plus, I think I remember someone from the FO saying they wanted more power/strikeouts out of the bullpen (though don't hold me to that).
by Kos @ Let's Go Tribe! on Oct 31, 2007 1:26 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
"I for one have a sinking feeling that four months from now, we're going to be missing Rhodes more than Crisp."
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
Sort of a good news/bad news thing, though, isn't it? The last five months, Riske had a 5.68 ERA against the Indians, 1.18 against everybody else.
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3087824
I used to really like him, back in his Phillies days, because I love that workhorse demeanor, but especially after this postseason, I could care less about him and don't feel the need to bring in an old, expensive attention whore.
We never surrender!
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
Also! FREE JASON BAY!
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
If we could bring in Bay and Schilling, imagine the effect it would have on signing A-Rod!
by Turkmenbashi on Oct 31, 2007 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
by jeremy @ Let's Go Tribe! on Oct 31, 2007 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
by Turkmenbashi on Oct 31, 2007 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
by jeremy @ Let's Go Tribe! on Oct 31, 2007 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
by Gradyforpresident on Oct 31, 2007 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
by Turkmenbashi on Oct 31, 2007 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
Although Riske's numbers are against AL hitting, if you buy into the talent disparity between the two leagues.
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
Linebrink's numbers also were in big ol' pitcher's parks.
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
by woodsmeister on Oct 31, 2007 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
by supermarioelia on Oct 31, 2007 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
by supermarioelia on Oct 31, 2007 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
by woodsmeister on Nov 2, 2007 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
Besides, if he tanks, you just RHA him (Roberto Hernandezed for Assignment)
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
That guy's so bad, he's gonna get RHA'd soon.
by Turkmenbashi on Oct 31, 2007 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
for young players out of options that never lived up to the hype much less show any ability to contribute get FCA'd or JDA'd.
For guys that clash with Wedge and/or the team phillosphy, they get MBA'd or BPA'd.
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
Also, rumors are that the Yankees are in talks with acquiring Joe Crede from the ChiSox.
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
In other news: Bobby Abreu's $16 million option for next season was exercised Friday by the New York Yankees.
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
The key will be if they resign Posada, his production will not be replaced,, they can't go out and sign a better catcher, because there are no better catchers available on the FA market. Could next year be the year the Yanks miss the playoffs? hopefully.
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
Re: Free Royals and dodged bullets
This kinda mistake would cripple the Tribe.

by 















