Game One Hundred Sixty-Four: Indians 2, Yankees 1 (11 Innings)
Indians lead series 2-0
Recap
Box Score
Win Probability Added @ Fangraphs
Highest WPA:
Fausto Carmona .461
Rafael Perez .286
Grady Sizemore .285
Chironomous plumosus .001
Lowest WPA:
Asdrubal Cabrera -.341
Jhonny Peralta -.183
Casey Blake -.176
In April, unseasonably cold weather canceled a four-game series and forced the Indians to play four fewer games at Jacobs Field than scheduled. In October, unseasonably warm weather and no wind brought a swarm of midges to Jacobs Field, where it just so happened that an important game was taking place.
But before I delve into what this game will be known for, let's take a look at what Fausto Carmona did against the best offense in baseball:
9.0 IP, 3 H, 1 R, 2 BB, 5 SO, 113 Pitches
It's unfortunate that posterity will concentrate on the winged invaders that distracted Joba Chamberlain on his way to a Hall of Fame career while ignoring the great (and I rarely use that word) pitching performance on the other side of the ledger. Carmona had to pitch six innings knowing that any further runs he gave up might mean a loss for the Indians. His last pitch in the ninth inning came on a full count to Alex Rodriguez with a runner on second. It was a dominating performance, certainly the best I've seen from an Indians pitcher in the playoffs.
While Fausto was pitching the game of his life, Andy Pettitte was channeling Charles Nagy, the 1997 ALCS version. In 1997, Nagy matched Mike Mussina inning-for-inning, but while Mussina almost effortlessly shut down the Indians, Nagy had a jam an inning to contend with. So it was with Pettitte last night; the Indians had a runner in scoring position in the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th, the sixth inning being the best opportunity with a leadoff triple by Grady Sizemore.
A combination of Pettitte (and Yankee relievers) making pitches and Indians hitters having terrible at-bats contributed to Cleveland hitting an awful 2-for-18 with RISP. The first hit (by Kenny Lofton, in the second) was nullified by Jhonny Peralta getting thrown out by Melky Cabrera. The second came in the 11th inning, a two-out, bases loaded, game-winning single by Travis Hafner. Between the two hits, the Indians went 0-for-16 with RISP. This was a game they should have won much earlier.
Now, the midges. They apparently don't bite, and they were gone a couple innings after they arrived, but Joba Chamberlain, the Yankees' phenom, happened to be pitching at the height of the swarm. Chamberlain did not pin his wildness on the infestation, to his credit, but that didn't stop other observers from doing so. Tom Verducci of SI.com wrote:
The midges affected everyone, including hitters and infielders, equally. Fausto Carmona was visibly distracted by the bugs, and he didn't have any problems throwing strikes. A delay of 30 or 40 minutes would probably have done more harm than playing through the swarm. Crew chief Bruce Froemming didn't even think about delaying the game:
Whichever way the game ended, the losing team was going to feel frustrated: the Indians, for having opportunity after opportunity to drive in the tying or winning run, and the Yankees, for the tiny insects that derailed their bionic reliever. But it was a fantastic game all the same, and one which will stick in both fanbase's memories long after this season ends.
Next Up: Westbrook vs. Clemens, Sunday @ 6:37 PM.
0 recs |
26 comments
Comments
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Four: Indians 2, Yankee
Every other pitcher in the game dealt with the bugs. (I'm excluding Vizcaino, who's pretty bad anyway.) Chamberlain spit the bit.
by fleerdon on
Oct 6, 2007 1:50 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Indians 2, Yankees 1 (11 Innings)
Evidently the baseball gods are not as powerful as Jehovah since they couldn't conjure up a plague of locusts or toads - but midges'll do. I'm for any kinda curse that helps destroy the Yanks.
by mauichuck on
Oct 6, 2007 1:51 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Four
i don't know how so sum up what it was like being at those two games and i'm sure most things have been said already. So:
Wow. just wow.
by Brick. on
Oct 6, 2007 2:49 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Four
by msmnsoda on
Oct 6, 2007 11:13 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Four: Indians 2, Yankee
by zempf on
Oct 6, 2007 2:55 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Four: Indians 2, Yankee
Yes, they can see the future. :-D
by Voltaire on
Oct 6, 2007 3:20 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game 164: Indians 2, Yankees 1
by JulioBernazard on
Oct 6, 2007 3:35 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Four
by Brick. on
Oct 6, 2007 3:40 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Four
by hans on
Oct 6, 2007 5:28 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Four
by Ryan on
Oct 6, 2007 6:13 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Four
If there is a game 4, (and I hope there won't be), I'd really like to see CC in game 4, which would leave Fausto for game 5, if needed. I think the Yankees are terrified of Fausto, and he would be going on normal rest.
by oxforddave on
Oct 6, 2007 10:38 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Four
(1) If we get to game four, use Byrd, and lose, do you skip Sabathia, or shadow one ace with the other?
(2) Could you pitch Sabathia on a count, and use Laffey for a few innings, in game four? Should I step off the "Laffey in the playoffs" thing?
by fleerdon on
Oct 6, 2007 11:13 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Four
(2) Ask Mike Hargrove about bringing back a pitcher on short rest when you're up in a series.
by Ryan on
Oct 7, 2007 1:08 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Four
It's funny you should link to that. I was just wondering what an all-out bullpen battle with the Yankees would look like. Though I suppose both teams have enough emergency starting that a reliever-by-reliever showdown is unlikely.
by fleerdon on
Oct 7, 2007 9:11 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Four
by Ryan on
Oct 7, 2007 5:14 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Four
by oxforddave on
Oct 7, 2007 5:10 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Four
by mauichuck on
Oct 7, 2007 7:55 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Four
by msmnsoda on
Oct 6, 2007 11:05 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Four
Yep, you're right. Our boyz are gonna peel back some wigs tomorrow!
by mauichuck on
Oct 6, 2007 11:55 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Four
by emil minty on
Oct 7, 2007 12:04 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Four: Indians 2, Yankee
by fleerdon on
Oct 6, 2007 10:31 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Four: Indians 2, Yankee
by Gradyforpresident on
Oct 7, 2007 4:53 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game One Hundred Sixty-Four: Indians 2, Yankee
by ASP on
Oct 7, 2007 12:22 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Steinbrenner
"The umpire was full of [expletive]," Steinbrenner told the paper. "He won't umpire our games anymore."
And people wonder why nobody likes the Yankees. He is the main reason I hate them. He stands for everything that is wrong with this sport. If he finds such injustice with Froemmings decision that he wants to can him, why is Giambi still on the team? That is unfair and injustice.
by lesterjl on
Oct 7, 2007 1:00 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Steinbrenner
by vbc3 on
Oct 7, 2007 2:13 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Steinbrenner
by oxforddave on
Oct 7, 2007 5:12 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
















