Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Recap
Boxscore
Win Probability Graph @ Fangraphs
Highest WPA:
Kelly Shoppach .172
Andy Marte .169
Joe Borowski .078
Lowest WPA:
Trot Nixon -.089
Roberto Hernandez -.082
Aaron Fultz -.014
First of all, huge props go to the fans of Milwaukee. The tickets were just $10 a piece, but getting 19,000 fans to Miller Park on such short notice is an amazing feat. You can't say enough about the atmosphere tonight.
As far as the game on the field is concerned, the things that were good last year were good for this game, and the aspects that were horrible previously were the same tonight. The offense gave CC Sabathia a lead early, lead by home runs by Kelly Shoppach and Casey Blake. Andy Marte pulled two doubles down the left field line, and Grady Sizemore walked and stole thrice tonight.
The bullpen was awful. Roberto Hernandez relieved Sabathia in the eighth and committed the cardinal sin of relieving: walks. You could blame the lack of command on the layoff, but he did this in Chicago as well. Rafael Betancourt eventually got out of the inning, but the lead was but two runs. Joe Borowski got the save (and consequently, a high WPA), but it was Kelly Shoppach who ended the game by nailing Erick Aybar at second base. Borowski gave up two hits and a run, and was facing a red-hot Howie Kendrick when Aybar attempted to steal. Thank you, Mike Scioscia.
Next Up: Game Two against the Angels in Milwaukee. The forecast outside is for copious amounts of snow, but the forecast inside is much better, thanks to the roof. Gametime is @7:05 PM.
46 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
But seriously, it was a lot of fun tonight and I'll be back tomorrow, even though we are supposed to get a foot of snow before the scheduled first pitch it'll be cozy inside Miller Park!
Thanks for letting us borrow your team Cleveland! And best of luck this year, if the baseball Gods smile on us we could see you guys again in October!!!
by RyDogg66 on Apr 10, 2007 11:15 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Fultz looked good again, but Borowski and Hernandez, oh boy. I don't want to talk about it. Also, I've been very impressed with Peralta's ABs. It really does look like he is seeing the ball better.
Finally, I guessed that 1,000 would show up for the game. I was only off by one and a half orders of magnitude.
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Look, if we're having a hot dog eating contest, and a bunch of baboons kidnap the contestants for four days, and I'm the first to escape and finish the hot dogs, it doesn't make me the new Kobayashi. It makes me a guy who can escape baboons.
Do you really think Josh Beckett would have rolled over the Mariners lineup if they had played on Sunday? No way, BECAUSE YOU DON'T PLAY BASEBALL WITH FOUR DAYS OFF BETWEEN GAMES.
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
by dgcambridge on Apr 11, 2007 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
by woodsmeister on Apr 11, 2007 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
- It was great to have baseball back, no matter where it was played.
- What the heck does F-Cab have to do to get into a game?
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Seriously, though, what gives? Roberto Hernandez has pitched in each official Indians game so far and F-Cab hasn't seen a batter?
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Also, in the NL, does the Wave run counter-clockwise, like an Australian toilet?
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
And the Australian toilet deal is a myth. The Coriolis effect acts only on a large scale.
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
So much for "rusty."
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
H/T to Dave Pinto at Baseball Musings for the link.
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
I happen to think his success chance was greater than 75% (Borowski seems to be poor at holding the running game, while Shoppach is better than average), so I think it was a fine decision. Even if it is less than 65% chance, it is not that bad of an idea. At least not as bad as an idea of having Borowski as your closer in the first place.
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Again point being, this decision was pretty much a toss-up, and in that case a manager has to go with his gut. Your mileage may vary.
Apparently it smarts for Angels fans as so far they have lost three games with two of them ending on an Aybar caught stealing.
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
Translates about as well as when I try to speak Spanish, but I didn't want to think any longer than I already did about it...
Re: Game Four: Indians 7, Angels 6
WE = whatever .....

by 















