Anatomy of a Farce
Just a quick overview as to why the Indians are now in Milwaukee, set to play a three-game home series:
Step #1. Last winter, MLB made up the 2007 schedule, and consulted with the Indians about their Opening Day. All indications were that the Indians could have opened the season at home, but the club declined, citing the Women's Final Four going on at the same time. So the schedulers adjusted their framework so that the Indians would open at home the first weekend of the season. So far, so good, even though early April weather in Northeast Ohio is often iffy, with rain and coldish temperatures prevalent through the first half of the month.
The big problem is that the schedulers had the home opener opponent be a team that made just one visit that season. Thanks to the unbalanced schedule and Interleague play, most AL West and AL East teams visit Cleveland but once a year. And given the distance between Seattle and Cleveland, making a return trip would be tricky to pull off.
The schedulers compounded the potential disaster by having the LA Angels follow the Mariners into Cleveland - another AL West club that only was scheduled to visit Northeast Ohio once this season.
Step #2. Even with the shoddy scheduling, the chances were good that a logistical nightmare would be avoided, because April weather in Cleveland isn't that bad. Sure, it rains often, but temperatures are normally in the 50s by this time. At worst, one or two games in the 10-game homestand would get postponed. But just a couple days into the season, the temperatures over the entire region dropped to unseasonable levels. And the kicker was that the winds were just right to cause a massive lake effect snow storm over Cleveland, dumping over a foot of snow over downtown. This caused Friday's home opener to be cut short, and the constant snowfall postponed the remaining three games of the series. As of this morning there was still quite a bit of snow in Jacobs Field, and the temperatures weren't warm enough to melt it quickly.
So right away, the Indians were put into the unenviable position of making up four games with a West Coast team who doesn't come back the rest of the season. This means doubleheaders on off-days, and possibly even making up some of the games in Seattle.
Step #3. The weather is improving, but not fast enough to get the field in playing shape for Tuesday. And any postponed games would fall into the same circumstances as the four with the Mariners. So the Indians and Major-League Baseball explored options to play the series elsewhere.
The correct solution would have been to switch home series with the Angels, as the Indians are scheduled to travel to Los Angeles in May for a three-game series. The Indians would not lose any additional home dates, and they would get the upcoming series in without dealing with the weather in Cleveland. But because most of the games in Los Angeles had big pre-sales, MLB didn't want to upset another franchise, so they deigned to screw just one team and be done with it, shifting three Indians home games elsewhere. Also working against this possible solution was a clause in the Collective Bargaining Agreement stating that any trip from the West Coast to the East Coast had to include an off-day; the schedule is such that a proposed swap could not happen unless the Player's Association agreed to it.
Indians owner Paul Dolan's suggestion of Miller Park in Milwaukee was agreed upon as a neutral site, and the Brewers agreed to it. To attract attendance, ticket prices were lowered to just $10 a seat. And judging by accounts from Brewers fans, tickets are going quickly. Who knows - perhaps the attendance in Milwaukee will surpass the crowds who would have showed up in chilly Cleveland.
Conclusion: Hopefully no other team will ever have to go through this again. The Indians are already at a severe competitive disadvantage, forfeiting at least three home games, not to mention the strain that making up four additional games will place on the team later in the season. The schedulers should bear the ultimate brunt of blame here, and there should a set in stone rule from this day forward that any series played before April 15th in a northern, open-air facility would be a division matchup. If the past four-game series would have been against Chicago or Detroit, it would have been difficult to make up the games, but you at least knew that they were going to be made up. And the geographic proximity of the teams is such that it would be relatively easy to get the teams back together on an off-day if necessary.
0 recs |
26 comments
Comments
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
This implies to me that they have to double up on certain games into seats which are likely to be worse.
It seems like suite holders get hosed the worst, since there exchange seats are in regular seating.
Are the Indians going to make some other accommodation for the season ticket holders?
by palcal on Apr 9, 2007 8:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
Last I checked, there should still be good seats left for the remaining 74 games.
by Jay on Apr 9, 2007 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
by oxforddave on Apr 9, 2007 11:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
The players need off days. We're going to miss them this year and it could cost us a playoff spot.
by LeftyCatcher on Apr 10, 2007 1:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
by Jay on Apr 10, 2007 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
by fleerdon on Apr 10, 2007 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
Given that, I imagine fans too would then be sour about a shortened season.
by Brandini on Apr 10, 2007 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
by LeftyCatcher on Apr 10, 2007 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
I hope I'm wrong.
by SpringTrainingFun on Apr 10, 2007 8:40 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
Instead of griping that "northern teams shouldn't start at home" (which I've been doing), I'm going to start saying "northern teams should only start at home against geographically-close division rivals."
by JulioBernazard on Apr 10, 2007 9:53 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
Now I am not advocating no division games for those two teams, but say Week 1 Sea/Oak goes to Minnesota while the other4 division rivals play. Then week 2 Tex/Angels play in KC while the other 4 play division games or maybe even Toronto/Baltimore.
Something along those lines.
by talonk on Apr 10, 2007 10:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
by Buzz on Apr 10, 2007 11:13 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
IMO shifting the games to LA without switching a series back to Cleveland would really screw the Indians. That would mean they'd play the Angels 10 times on the road, with zero home games. Not that playing the games at a neutral site is much better.
by Ryan on Apr 10, 2007 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
by Turkmenbashi on Apr 10, 2007 12:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
by LeftyCatcher on Apr 10, 2007 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
The draft schedules are released about 9 months in advance for review by the teams and the players union and changes do get made. Katy Feeney is the MLB executive in charge of the schedule and she says wishes she had a weather forecast that far in advance.
Here is what happened a decade ago per Ronald Blum, AP:
"Baseball tried to work around the cold a decade ago, without great success. After enduring a snowout at Boston's Fenway Park, a snowy afternoon at Yankee Stadium and cold in Detroit and Chicago in 1996, baseball remade the schedule for 1997, using covered fields and every West Coast site.
"After teams in the East and Midwest got home, eight games were washed out by weather on the season's second Saturday, raising that year's total to 17."
So not playing in Cleveland in the first 10 days is not the answer, playing teams that return to Cleveland later in the season is the key factor.
by palcal on Apr 10, 2007 1:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
In baseball terms...A LOOGY isn't always going to get their job done, however, the odds are in their favor as per the matchup.
by Brandini on Apr 10, 2007 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
by palcal on Apr 10, 2007 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
CC needs to get off to a much better start than Weaver tonight. Hopefully, CC has learned to keep his focus.
by palcal on Apr 10, 2007 3:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
by fwembt on Apr 10, 2007 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
by Tribe4eva on Apr 10, 2007 6:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
whole, meaning Indians, Mariners, and Brewers, but
obviously primarily the Indians.
by palcal on Apr 10, 2007 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
by Jay on Apr 10, 2007 11:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
by Brick. on Apr 11, 2007 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
Pretty mind blowing that almost 10% of the home games are wiped out - they have no business scheduling a 10 game homestand this early. Assuming you have a few rainouts during the season, do they create a priority list for scheduling makeup games?
by maximize22 on Apr 10, 2007 6:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anatomy of a Farce
Everything considered, there is a good-sized crowd in Milwaukee tonight, and they appreciate seeing 2 good AL teams.
by palcal on Apr 10, 2007 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















