Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Tiger Woods, Tony Romo Grouped Together At Pebble Beach

Anatomy of a Farce

Just a quick overview as to why the Indians are now in Milwaukee, set to play a three-game home series:

Step #1. Last winter, MLB made up the 2007 schedule, and consulted with the Indians about their Opening Day. All indications were that the Indians could have opened the season at home, but the club declined, citing the Women's Final Four going on at the same time. So the schedulers adjusted their framework so that the Indians would open at home the first weekend of the season. So far, so good, even though early April weather in Northeast Ohio is often iffy, with rain and coldish temperatures prevalent through the first half of the month.

The big problem is that the schedulers had the home opener opponent be a team that made just one visit that season. Thanks to the unbalanced schedule and Interleague play, most AL West and AL East teams visit Cleveland but once a year. And given the distance between Seattle and Cleveland,  making a return trip would be tricky to pull off.

The schedulers compounded the potential disaster by having the LA Angels follow the Mariners into Cleveland - another AL West club that only was scheduled to visit Northeast Ohio once this season.

Step #2. Even with the shoddy scheduling, the chances were good that a logistical nightmare would be avoided, because April weather in Cleveland isn't that bad. Sure, it rains often, but temperatures are normally in the 50s by this time. At worst, one or two games in the 10-game homestand would get postponed. But just a couple days into the season, the temperatures over the entire region dropped to unseasonable levels. And the kicker was that the winds were just right to cause a massive lake effect snow storm over Cleveland, dumping over a foot of snow over downtown. This caused Friday's home opener to be cut short, and the constant snowfall postponed the remaining three games of the series. As of this morning there was still quite a bit of snow in Jacobs Field, and the temperatures weren't warm enough to melt it quickly.

So right away, the Indians were put into the unenviable position of making up four games with a West Coast team who doesn't come back the rest of the season. This means doubleheaders on off-days, and possibly even making up some of the games in Seattle.

Step #3. The weather is improving, but not fast enough to get the field in playing shape for Tuesday. And any postponed games would fall into the same circumstances as the four with the Mariners. So the Indians and Major-League Baseball explored options to play the series elsewhere.

The correct solution would have been to switch home series with the Angels, as the Indians are scheduled to travel to Los Angeles in May for a three-game series. The Indians would not lose any additional home dates, and they would get the upcoming series in without dealing with the weather in Cleveland. But because most of the games in Los Angeles had big pre-sales, MLB didn't want to upset another franchise, so they deigned to screw just one team and be done with it, shifting three Indians home games elsewhere. Also working against this possible solution was a clause in the Collective Bargaining Agreement stating that any trip from the West Coast to the East Coast had to include an off-day; the schedule is such that a proposed swap could not happen unless the Player's Association agreed to it.

Indians owner Paul Dolan's suggestion of Miller Park in Milwaukee was agreed upon as a neutral site, and the Brewers agreed to it. To attract attendance, ticket prices were lowered to just $10 a seat. And judging by accounts from Brewers fans, tickets are going quickly. Who knows - perhaps the attendance in Milwaukee will surpass the crowds who would have showed up in chilly Cleveland.

Conclusion: Hopefully no other team will ever have to go through this again. The Indians are already at a severe competitive disadvantage, forfeiting at least three home games, not to mention the strain that making up four additional games will place on the team later in the season. The schedulers should bear the ultimate brunt of blame here, and there should a set in stone rule from this day forward that any series played before April 15th in a northern, open-air facility would be a division matchup. If the past four-game series would have been against Chicago or Detroit, it would have been difficult to make up the games, but you at least knew that they were going to be made up. And the geographic proximity of the teams is such that it would be relatively easy to get the teams back together on an off-day if necessary.  

Comment 26 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
According to the ticket exchange policy, it appears that full season ticket holders are required to exchange their tickets (for games which are not rescheduled) into tickets for remaining 2007 games.

This implies to me that they have to double up on certain games into seats which are likely to be worse.

It seems like suite holders get hosed the worst, since there exchange seats are in regular seating.

Are the Indians going to make some other accommodation for the season ticket holders?

by palcal on Apr 9, 2007 8:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
Without wanting to seem cold (haha), the weather is not the Indians' fault either.  Suites are not sold per-game as far as I know, but per-season -- so what can anyone really do about it?

Last I checked, there should still be good seats left for the remaining 74 games.

by Jay on Apr 9, 2007 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
As always, a great and reasoned take. Thanks Ryan.

by oxforddave on Apr 9, 2007 11:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
Dare I say it? I think the season should be shortened, maybe to 158 games. I've felt all along that 162 games per season is too many. With the playoff system we now have the World Series has been pushed too far back in the fall.

The players need off days. We're going to miss them this year and it could cost us a playoff spot.

by LeftyCatcher on Apr 10, 2007 1:02 AM EDT reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
I'm all for shortening back to 154, while also reducing the schedule by a few days (start on Friday rather than Sunday).  It's still an enormous season.

by Jay on Apr 10, 2007 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
One way out for MLB would be to just lop a week off everybody's schedule next year and start the season later...with a set plan for dealing with these problems. I think most fans would be okay with a shorter season, but the players and the owners might have financial issues with that solution.

by fleerdon on Apr 10, 2007 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
No way the owners go for that...And if they do, there will be an average ticket price increase to make up for the 4 lost home games.
Given that, I imagine fans too would then be sour about a shortened season.
Governor's Cup in '07!

by Brandini on Apr 10, 2007 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
Why increase ticket prices? The game it entitles us to see is still 9 innings. It's the players whose annual workload that has been eased. They should take a small cut in pay.

by LeftyCatcher on Apr 10, 2007 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
This whole debacle is one giant flustercuck.  I have a sense that this will have an adverse impact on the Indians coming down the stretch run.  

I hope I'm wrong.

by SpringTrainingFun on Apr 10, 2007 8:40 AM EDT reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
Excellent rundown.

Instead of griping that "northern teams shouldn't start at home" (which I've been doing), I'm going to start saying "northern teams should only start at home against geographically-close division rivals."

by JulioBernazard on Apr 10, 2007 9:53 AM EDT reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
I also agree with the geographically close rivals. This way if a West Coast team has to come throught the midwest early in the year, they can play in Minnesota or KC during the first 2 weeks of April rather than Cleveland, Detroit, or Chicago.

Now I am not advocating no division games for those two teams, but say Week 1 Sea/Oak goes to Minnesota while the other4 division rivals play. Then week 2 Tex/Angels play in KC while the other 4 play division games or maybe even Toronto/Baltimore.

Something along those lines.

by talonk on Apr 10, 2007 10:55 AM EDT reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
Was there a reason that the Tribe could not play "home" games in LA this week?  Other than the day off thing?  It seems that attendance would be higher if you play in at least one team's city.  Plus, the travel to Milwaukee cannot be that much different than travel to LA.  The money to be gained by playing in LA should make everyone happy.

by Buzz on Apr 10, 2007 11:13 AM EDT reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
Yeah, the Angels didn't want to fly all the way to Boston on Thursday, even if the game was played in the afternoon.

IMO shifting the games to LA without switching a series back to Cleveland would really screw the Indians. That would mean they'd play the Angels 10 times on the road, with zero home games. Not that playing the games at a neutral site is much better.

by Ryan on Apr 10, 2007 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
The big question to me is how long will it take the Tribe to recover? I really hope this setback doesn't screw with us all season. Someone comfort my fears...
Come on Dorn, get in front of the damn ball! Don't give me this "ole" bulls**t!

by Turkmenbashi on Apr 10, 2007 12:13 PM EDT reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
Two years ago, there were a lot of articles about the MLB switching schedulers from the previous grandma and grandpop operation that had been making the schedules for 25 years to a company, Sports Scheduling Group, with PhDs in operations research.

The draft schedules are released about 9 months in advance for review by the teams and the players union and changes do get made.  Katy Feeney is the MLB executive in charge of the schedule and she says wishes she had a weather forecast that far in advance.

Here is what happened a decade ago per Ronald Blum, AP:

"Baseball tried to work around the cold a decade ago, without great success. After enduring a snowout at Boston's Fenway Park, a snowy afternoon at Yankee Stadium and cold in Detroit and Chicago in 1996, baseball remade the schedule for 1997, using covered fields and every West Coast site.

"After teams in the East and Midwest got home, eight games were washed out by weather on the season's second Saturday, raising that year's total to 17."

So not playing in Cleveland in the first 10 days is not the answer, playing teams that return to Cleveland later in the season is the key factor.

by palcal on Apr 10, 2007 1:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
Ofcourse it isn't going to be a 100% problem free solution, even if they bump the season back three months, there isn't a problem free solution.  However, there are ways of avoiding certain circumstances.  It is my opinion that the league and its clubs can deal with rain outs, but cold/snow, those are two entirely different factors that could be somewhat avoided.

In baseball terms...A LOOGY isn't always going to get their job done, however, the odds are in their favor as per the matchup.

Governor's Cup in '07!

by Brandini on Apr 10, 2007 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
MLB will make some changes (mostly playing teams that make a return visit) but will not adopt a full-blown 1997 style schedule.

by palcal on Apr 10, 2007 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
Boston is leading Seattle 7-0 after 2 innings.

CC needs to get off to a much better start than Weaver tonight.  Hopefully, CC has learned to keep his focus.

by palcal on Apr 10, 2007 3:05 PM EDT reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
So long as he has learned he is not Jeff Weaver he should be fine.
Wait 'til next year... or something like that

by Brad D on Apr 10, 2007 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
  Although the potential loss of 4 actual home games is reprehensible, the financial obligations should lie with MLB. Yhe powers that be shoul reimburse the Tribes lost revenue, and if the resheduling costs them a playoff run, the club should sue. Clear cut case of MLB having their heads way up their ass. You can bet anything this would never happen to the Yankees or the Red Sox.

by Tribe4eva on Apr 10, 2007 6:02 PM EDT reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
MLB said that all teams would be made financially
whole, meaning Indians, Mariners, and Brewers, but
obviously primarily the Indians.

by palcal on Apr 10, 2007 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
The Commissioner's Office has a very substantial discretionary fund that he's entitled to use in situations like this.  Just a few years ago, he cut a huge check to the Blue Jays to help offset some massive U.S.-Canada currency fluctuations that were really screwing them.

by Jay on Apr 10, 2007 11:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
i never knew this.  quite impressive, i think.  do other sports have this?  did the saints get a check from the NFL?

by Brick. on Apr 11, 2007 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
Did anyone suggest playing the games in the Florida, say at Chain O Lakes?  You'd get more (retired) fans there than in Milwaukee, decent weather, and a break for all of the players from the snow.  Only problem is those stadiums tend to be small...

Pretty mind blowing that almost 10% of the home games are wiped out - they have no business scheduling a 10 game homestand this early.  Assuming you have a few rainouts during the season, do they create a priority list for scheduling makeup games?

by maximize22 on Apr 10, 2007 6:54 PM EDT reply actions  

Re: Anatomy of a Farce
After Anaheim was considered and discarded, Milwaukee and Houston were the 2 options considered.

Everything considered, there is a good-sized crowd in Milwaukee tonight, and they appreciate seeing 2 good AL teams.

by palcal on Apr 10, 2007 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Constantly updated Indians news, lots of in-depth analysis, live in-game discussions — and more fanatical and thoughtful Indians fans than every other web site combined.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Dsc01731_small
Some quick questions for the locals
Etat_small
Eric's 2012 Cleveland Indians Projections...
Its_alive-fstn_small
Oswalt > Carmona/Heredia
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #24
Avatard_small
Nickname Seeks Indian — "Country Peach Passion"
Avatard_small
Nickname seeks Indian vote — "Fridge Magnet"
Topps1978-332f_small
Indians by the Numbers — #23
Small
Seriously Go Get Carlos Peña Now
Avatard_small
Indians by the Numbers — #22
Avatard_small
Nickname Seeks Indian: "Fridge Magnet"

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Featured Poll

Poll
Will Matt LaPorta be on the opening day roster?
Yes
59 votes
No
140 votes

199 votes | Poll has closed

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

A look back at the last Tribe arbitration hearing
MLB.COM Tribe Top 20
Jared Goedert is Puddin Head Jones
Chisenhall v.  Hannahan
After watching Lindor in the Fall Instructional League, I have very little...
Coming off of an optimistic 80-82 season, is this the Indians window to win?  

See full post on Beyond the Box Score
Praising the Indians offseason
Brooks Baseball Stats
Hello my friends! I hope you guys are ready for Super Bowl Weekend? Make...
Heyman reporting Indians will sign Kotchman

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managers

427px-nap_lajoie_1913_small Ryan

Dosequisman_small Jay

Editors

3444ant_black_small APV

47b8dd28b3127cceb64839d9746800000026102bauwjrq3za_small afh4