Around SBN: Race to the BCS: rankings, in-game scores & blogs Bar-right-arrows


Nyroyal3a

NYRoyal

Mar 28, 2008 Nov 22, 2008 171 15949

Hi, I'm Scott. I was born and raised in Kansas and I have a couple of degrees from Kansas State University and a law degree from the University of Minnesota Law School. I moved to New York City in 2000 and I've been here every since. But my obsession with the Kansas City Royals has only grown since I moved here.

I will state my opinions clearly, boldly and sometimes undipomatically. Sometimes I'll agree with you, but often I'll disagree with you. I will challenge your statements and I'll be critical. Don't take it personally. I just state my opinions and I enjoy a good discussion or debate more than just expressing my agreement.

a fan of

Kansas City Royals Major League Baseball Team

Kansas City Chiefs National Football League Team

Kansas St. Wildcats NCAA Men's Football Division 1A Team

Kansas St. Wildcats NCAA Men's Basketball Division 1 Team

rss icon RSSUser Blog

Craig Brown reviews how DM has spent the currency of baseball

The reviews are largely positive. But clearly no blockbuster trades here.

comment 1 day ago Nyroyal3a_tiny NYRoyal comment 7 comments 0 recs

Rany expands his thoughts on Coco-RamRam

He said some of these things on 810 yesterday. He says more on his blog. Some highlights:

In some ways, trading Ramon Ramirez for Coco Crisp is similar to trading Leo Nunez for Mike Jacobs...The difference is that Nunez for Jacobs didn’t help the Royals all that much, relative to a stand-pat move. Trading Ramirez for Crisp does.

Make no mistake: the defensive upgrade is the only reason to think this trade makes the Royals better, and it is reason enough to make the trade.

My sometimes colleague at BP, Dayn Perry, wrote a book a while back ("Winners") in which he broke down many of the championship teams of the last generation to see what they had in common. I think his most interesting point was that he found a preponderance of teams that went to the playoffs had essentially two centerfielders: one of their corner outfielders (generally the leftfielder) was a former centerfielder who still had good range at the position.

I think there’s a potential synergy in play here, between a DeJesus-Crisp outfield and a rotation that has four fly-ball pitchers in Greinke, Bannister, Meche, and Davies. Even Soria has a low G/F ratio

I think that the sum of Crisp’s offensive contributions will approximate those of the man he is replacing, likely Mark Teahen. So it’s a wash on offense, and a pickup of maybe 20 runs on defense.

So I don’t know about you, but if Moore wants to trade another reliever – a reliever he had just acquired for a failed starter eight months ago – for an everyday centerfielder, I have faith he’s going to be able to replenish the well.

The addition of Jacobs and Crisp is worth on the order of 5 wins over the course of a year, more if the Royals can turn Teahen into something with present value. Is that enough to make the Royals a contender? No. Even if Gordon or Butler has a breakout season, probably not. If they both have breakout seasons, it’s still a maybe. But if the Royals add one more bat to the lineup, the calculus changes.

This is not a risk-free trade, but for the Royals, the upside trumps the downside. I think that the Red Sox are more likely to win this trade by a little. But I think that the Royals are more likely to win this trade by a lot.

comment 2 days ago Nyroyal3a_tiny NYRoyal comment 31 comments 0 recs

Royals 2009 Payroll (including projections)

After the Jacobs and Crisp trades, I thought it would be instructive to see where the payroll stands.  So, below you'll see the Royals current payroll.  I have included arbitration and pre-arbitration estimates.  I included arbitration numbers for just about all eligible players, except for Gobble and Gathright, as I think they either will be non-tendered or traded before opening day.

Before you jump to the numbers, I want to mention this from today's KC Star:

Even with a projected payroll pushing a club-record $70 million, the Royals, apparently, aren’t yet tapped out.

"There’s flexibility for us to do some other things," Moore said. "We have the opportunity to improve our payroll maybe 20-25 percent over last year."

Moore previously cited $70 million as a likely ceiling, which would represent roughly a 20 percent increase over last year’s $58.2 million payroll on opening day. A 25 percent hike boosts the total to about $72.7 million.

First, that $58.2M 2008 payroll number is, to put it succinctly, bullshit.  That is a weak, lazy and very soft job of journalism.  That was the payroll of the 25 men who happened to be on the MLB roster on opening day.  It was not the Royals actual 2008 major league payroll (total of all outlayed major league contract expenditures), nor even what it was projected to be back on opening day.  That number doesn't include Berroa's $5.25M salary as well as some others.

When all was said and done, the Royals 2008 MLB payroll was actually about $67M.  So when Moore says that he can improve payroll by 20-25 percent, I think that means that the payroll budget is potentially $80-84M.  Or that could just be fan-placating rhetoric on Moore's part.  But Moore certainly knows what the real major payroll was.  Currently, the Royals payroll projects at about $71M.

Royals_payroll_plus_-_2009_11-20_medium

37 comments | 4 recs

A Mark Ellis note for devil_fingers

d_f, I asked a Mark Ellis question to Christina Kahrl at BP for you. Basically, she was underwhelmed by the signing. Here's the Q&A in case you missed it:

Scott the Stathead (NY, NY): I've been dying to read what you have to say about the Mark Ellis signing. Good deal for the A's? Is he worth the risk? What is his value given his hitting, defense, age and injury history?

Christina Kahrl: Lamentably, the A's were one of two teams I didn't get to in the article that's about to be published, but I expect to comment on their moves (Joe Dillon is free!) and the Blue Jays' after we wrap up here. But to be terse (by my standards), the word that sums up my feelings on keeping Ellis is 'resigned' (as opposed to 're-signed'). OK, we kept him, and in the long and unhappy history of second base in A's history, Ellis is sort of our generation's Dick Green, a nifty player, but not a great one. For that money, it's not a great deal, and given that it's spread out evenly, this isn't even a situation like Terrence Long's contract, where we can always hope Billy gets somebody else to pick up the heavy back end of the tab.

She wrote a longer piece about the Ellis signing shortly thereafter which expanded on this, but the bottom line was essentially the same. Not a bad deal, but not a particularly good deal either.

comment 16 days ago Nyroyal3a_tiny NYRoyal comment 18 comments 0 recs

Who won the election prediction contest?

With respect, this isn't of a great deal of importance, but what else do we have to do?  Complain about the next "Royals are interested in Player X" rumor?  Anyway, there are no clear metrics for determining the winner of this little prediction contest.  But I think there were 3 clear finalists.  The semi-final election results were:

Obama +6.3

364 Electoral votes (wins North Carolina but not Missouri)

McCain concession speech starts at 11:16 EST

and your finalists:

DarthYoshi

Obama +5 points

338 Electoral votes

11:20 pm EST

RoyalRetro

Obama +6

352 Electoral votes

10:30 EST

KCBear

Obama +7.3%

364 Electoral votes

11:36 ET

All three were pretty close on each prediction.  Of the three, Retro was closest on popular vote margin.  KCBear nailed the electoral vote.  DarthYoshi was only a few minutes off on the concession speech time.

Poll
Who won the election prediction contest?
DarthYoshi
4 votes
RoyalRetro
6 votes
KCBear
21 votes
Who gives a #@!%? Send the t-shirt to John McCain. He needs some cheering up.
2 votes
Who givs a #@!%? Send the t-shirt to Sarah Palin. She needs more down to earth, Joe Six-Pack clothes.
11 votes

44 votes | Poll has closed

22 comments | 0 recs

Election Day Open Thread

We're going to try this.  Let's all be polite and respectful of others.  Some of us want one candidate to win.  Some want another.  Some might even want a third guy to win.  Whatever.  Politics can get emotional.  Elections even moreso.  Election Day, triply so.  So let's avoid any nastiness before, during and after the returns come in.  

To spice things up a bit, let's have a prediction contest.  No prize or anything, just for bragging rights. [EDIT - I'll send the winner a free Royals Review T-Shirt]

Popular vote margin (such as: Barr +3.8)

Electoral votes of winning candidate 

Time that the loser begins his concession speech (be sure to include the time zone you're using)

I'll start things off with mine:

Obama +8.2

353

11:52 EST

 

One other thing.  If you haven't voted yet, GO VOTE!

404 comments | 1 recs

A Dream for St. Crispin's Day

Today is St. Crispin's Day.  This antiquated holiday commemorates a pair of twins who were martyred in A.D. 286, and on this day in 1415, the English fought the French in a mildly important battle near Agincourt, France.  The Battle of Agincourt would have likely faded to merely a footnote in the long history of French and English fighting over the two shores of the English Channel, if it had not been immortalized by Shakespeare in his play, Henry V.  The play’s climactic scene involves this battle. 

 

The English forces have been campaigning throughout France and are on their way home to England, but a French force cuts them off.  Exhausted from the campaign, the English face fresh troops which, as legend has it, outnumbers them 10-to-1.  The morale of the English soldiers is understandably low.  Enter young King Henry V, who gives arguably the best pre-game speech in history.  A pregame speech which would make Gandhi pick up a sword.  A pregame speech which makes Knute Rockne look like Tony Muser.

 

My fantasy for St. Crispin's Day 2009 is that Trey Hillman has to give a pregame speech to the Royals before Game 7 of the ALCS (I chose the ALCS, because the Yankees make for a more powerful foe than some NL team).  And this is the speech I would like for him to give (my apologies to The Bard).

[To see how this speech should be delivered, view Kenneth Branagh's version (Act 4, Scene 3)]

 

BUTLER

O I wish we had better players against these Yankees

 

HILLMAN

What's he that wishes so?

My friend Butler? No, my young friend;

If we are mark'd to lose, we are enow

To do Kansas City loss; and if to win,

Let it be us, we deserve the honour.

God's will! I pray thee, wish not one new player.

By Jove, I am not covetous for big contracts,

Nor care I who doth feed upon my cost;

It yearns me not if fans my jersey wear;

Such outward things dwell not in my desires.

But if it be a sin to covet winning,

I am the most offending soul alive.

No, faith, my friend, wish not for better players.

God's peace! I would not lose so great an honour

As one man more methinks would share from me

For the best hope I have. O, do not wish one more!

Rather proclaim it, Billy, through my host,

That he which hath no stomach for this game,

Let him depart; he will be given his unconditional release,

And he can even keep his per diem;

We would not play side by side with the man

That fears his fellowship to play with us.

 

This day is call'd the feast of Crispian.

He that plays this day, and comes safe home,

Will stand a tip-toe when this day is nam'd,

And rouse him at the name of Crispian.

He that shall play this day, and see old age,

Will yearly on the vigil feast his neighbours,

And say 'To-morrow is Saint Crispian.'

Then will he strip his sleeve and show his championship ring

And say 'This ring I won on Crispian's day.'

   

Old players forget; yet all shall be forgot,

But he'll remember, with advantages,

What feats he did that day. Then shall our names,

Familiar in his mouth as household words-

Hillman the manager, Greinke and Meche

Gordon and Butler, DeJesus and Aviles-

Be in their flowing cups freshly rememb'red.

This story shall the good fan teach his son;

And Crispin Crispian shall ne'er go by,

From this day to the ending of the world,

But we in it shall be remembered-

We few, we happy few, we band of Royals;

For he to-day that takes this field with me

Shall always be a Royal; no matter where his career takes him,

This day shall make us all champions;

And gentlemen in Kansas City now-a-bed

Shall think themselves accurs'd that they didn't set their VCR's,

And hold their fanhoods cheap whiles any speaks

That played with us upon Saint Crispin's day!

 

KUNTZ

Skip, we better get out there;

The Yanks are taking the field,

And it’s almost time for the first pitch

 

HILLMAN

All things are ready, if our grit be so.

 

BUTLER

To hell with anyone who isn’t ready to play now!

 

HILLMAN

You don’t want better players, Billy?

 

BUTLER

Hell no.  I think you and me could take ‘em alone!

17 comments | 3 recs | Digg!

Joba Chamberlain has a major drinking problem

Joba got a DUI this weekend. Clearly, just like Callaspo, he is an alcoholic with a major problem.

comment about 1 month ago Nyroyal3a_tiny NYRoyal comment 9 comments 0 recs

How good is a #1, #2, #3, #4, #5 starting pitcher?

When talking about starting pitchers, we like to throw around labels like “ace” or “#2 SP” or “#3-quality pitcher.”  And when we do this, we all have some idea in our heads as to what that means.  The problem is that everyone has a somewhat different conception of these classifications, and I don’t know how accurately those ideas reflect reality.  I think that if those terms are to be meaningfully descriptive, they must reflect how a pitcher compares to the other starting pitchers in his league.  For instance, if you are in the top 1/5th of starting pitchers in your league, you’re an “ace” or “#1 SP”.  So I devised a simple study to describe statistically what a #1, #2, #3, #4 and #5 pitcher is, and what that says about the Royals starters. 

Continue reading this post »

154 comments | 8 recs

Big Prediction Contest - We have a winner!

Way back in the salad days of March, I posted the Big Prediction Contest.  Well, the results are in.  Below you’ll find the various stat categories, the actual result and then the average or plurality prediction from the contest in parentheses.

 

Record – 75-87 (79-83)

Runs Scored – 691 (766)

Runs Allowed – 781 (774)

Batting Average - .269 (.273)

OPS - .717 (.748)

HR – 120 (135)

ERA – 4.48 (4.53)

 

Runs – Gordon (DeJesus)

Doubles – Guillen (Butler)

Triples – DeJesus (Teahen)

Home Runs – Guillen (Gordon)

RBI – Guillen (Guillen)

Walks – Gordon (DeJesus)

Stolen Bases – Gathright (Gathright)

Batting Average  (min 125 AB) – Aviles (Butler)

OBP (min 125 AB) – DeJesus (DeJesus)

SLG (min 125 AB) – Aviles (Guillen)

OPS (min 125 AB) – Aviles (Butler)

 

Wins – Meche (Meche)

Saves – Soria (Soria)

Quality Starts – Greinke (Meche)

Holds – R. Ramirez, Mahay (Gobble)

Innings Pitched – Meche (Meche)

Strike outs – Meche, Greinke (Greinke)

K/9 (min 40 IP) – Soria (Soria)

BB/9 (min 40 IP) – Tomko (Bannister)

ERA (min 40 IP) – Soria (Soria)

 

Tie breaker: Games out of first place – 13 (15)

 

The top 10 out of the 37 entries are as follows:

1.  Gopherballs 45 (won on tie breaker)

2.  RoyalsRetro 45

3.  kcisbetterthanstlateverything 43

4.  loyal2’sdad 41

5.  RoyalsNation 40 (tb)

6.  Firebell 40

7.  Billex Gordler 39

8.  dman126 37

9.  MileHighKCfan 36 (tb)

10. I need more Esteban 36

 

 

Congrats to Gopherballs on his prescience.  The Big Prediction Contest will be back next March, probably with some tweaks.

7 comments | 1 recs

Site Meter